netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jay Vosburgh <jv@jvosburgh.net>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>,
	Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>, Jianbo Liu <jianbol@nvidia.com>,
	Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>,
	Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>,
	Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@nvidia.com>, Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCHv4 net 1/3] bonding: move IPsec deletion to bond_ipsec_free_sa
Date: Tue,  4 Mar 2025 13:11:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250304131120.31135-2-liuhangbin@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250304131120.31135-1-liuhangbin@gmail.com>

The fixed commit placed mutex_lock() inside spin_lock_bh(), which triggers
a warning:

  BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at...

Fix this by moving the IPsec deletion operation to bond_ipsec_free_sa,
which is not held by spin_lock_bh().

Additionally, delete the IPsec list in bond_ipsec_del_sa_all() when the
XFRM state is DEAD to prevent xdo_dev_state_free() from being triggered
again in bond_ipsec_free_sa().

For bond_ipsec_free_sa(), there are now three conditions:

  1. if (!slave): When no active device exists.
  2. if (!xs->xso.real_dev): When xdo_dev_state_add() fails.
  3. if (xs->xso.real_dev != real_dev): When an xs has already been freed
     by bond_ipsec_del_sa_all() due to migration, and the active slave has
     changed to a new device. At the same time, the xs is marked as DEAD
     due to the XFRM entry is removed, triggering xfrm_state_gc_task() and
     bond_ipsec_free_sa().

In all three cases, xdo_dev_state_free() should not be called, only xs
should be removed from bond->ipsec list.

At the same time, protect bond_ipsec_del_sa_all and bond_ipsec_add_sa_all
with x->lock for each xs being processed. This prevents XFRM from
concurrently initiating add/delete operations on the managed states.

Fixes: 2aeeef906d5a ("bonding: change ipsec_lock from spin lock to mutex")
Reported-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20241212062734.182a0164@kernel.org
Suggested-by: Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index e45bba240cbc..06b060d9b031 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -537,15 +537,22 @@ static void bond_ipsec_add_sa_all(struct bonding *bond)
 	}
 
 	list_for_each_entry(ipsec, &bond->ipsec_list, list) {
+		spin_lock_bh(&ipsec->xs->lock);
+		/* Skip dead xfrm states, they'll be freed later. */
+		if (ipsec->xs->km.state == XFRM_STATE_DEAD)
+			goto next;
+
 		/* If new state is added before ipsec_lock acquired */
 		if (ipsec->xs->xso.real_dev == real_dev)
-			continue;
+			goto next;
 
 		ipsec->xs->xso.real_dev = real_dev;
 		if (real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_add(ipsec->xs, NULL)) {
 			slave_warn(bond_dev, real_dev, "%s: failed to add SA\n", __func__);
 			ipsec->xs->xso.real_dev = NULL;
 		}
+next:
+		spin_unlock_bh(&ipsec->xs->lock);
 	}
 out:
 	mutex_unlock(&bond->ipsec_lock);
@@ -560,7 +567,6 @@ static void bond_ipsec_del_sa(struct xfrm_state *xs)
 	struct net_device *bond_dev = xs->xso.dev;
 	struct net_device *real_dev;
 	netdevice_tracker tracker;
-	struct bond_ipsec *ipsec;
 	struct bonding *bond;
 	struct slave *slave;
 
@@ -592,15 +598,6 @@ static void bond_ipsec_del_sa(struct xfrm_state *xs)
 	real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_delete(xs);
 out:
 	netdev_put(real_dev, &tracker);
-	mutex_lock(&bond->ipsec_lock);
-	list_for_each_entry(ipsec, &bond->ipsec_list, list) {
-		if (ipsec->xs == xs) {
-			list_del(&ipsec->list);
-			kfree(ipsec);
-			break;
-		}
-	}
-	mutex_unlock(&bond->ipsec_lock);
 }
 
 static void bond_ipsec_del_sa_all(struct bonding *bond)
@@ -617,8 +614,18 @@ static void bond_ipsec_del_sa_all(struct bonding *bond)
 
 	mutex_lock(&bond->ipsec_lock);
 	list_for_each_entry(ipsec, &bond->ipsec_list, list) {
+		spin_lock_bh(&ipsec->xs->lock);
 		if (!ipsec->xs->xso.real_dev)
-			continue;
+			goto next;
+
+		if (ipsec->xs->km.state == XFRM_STATE_DEAD) {
+			/* already dead no need to delete again */
+			if (real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_free)
+				real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_free(ipsec->xs);
+			list_del(&ipsec->list);
+			kfree(ipsec);
+			goto next;
+		}
 
 		if (!real_dev->xfrmdev_ops ||
 		    !real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_delete ||
@@ -631,6 +638,8 @@ static void bond_ipsec_del_sa_all(struct bonding *bond)
 			if (real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_free)
 				real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_free(ipsec->xs);
 		}
+next:
+		spin_unlock_bh(&ipsec->xs->lock);
 	}
 	mutex_unlock(&bond->ipsec_lock);
 }
@@ -640,6 +649,7 @@ static void bond_ipsec_free_sa(struct xfrm_state *xs)
 	struct net_device *bond_dev = xs->xso.dev;
 	struct net_device *real_dev;
 	netdevice_tracker tracker;
+	struct bond_ipsec *ipsec;
 	struct bonding *bond;
 	struct slave *slave;
 
@@ -659,11 +669,22 @@ static void bond_ipsec_free_sa(struct xfrm_state *xs)
 	if (!xs->xso.real_dev)
 		goto out;
 
-	WARN_ON(xs->xso.real_dev != real_dev);
+	mutex_lock(&bond->ipsec_lock);
+	list_for_each_entry(ipsec, &bond->ipsec_list, list) {
+		if (ipsec->xs == xs) {
+			/* do xdo_dev_state_free if real_dev matches,
+			 * otherwise only remove the list
+			 */
+			if (real_dev && real_dev->xfrmdev_ops &&
+			    real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_free)
+				real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_free(xs);
+			list_del(&ipsec->list);
+			kfree(ipsec);
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+	mutex_unlock(&bond->ipsec_lock);
 
-	if (real_dev && real_dev->xfrmdev_ops &&
-	    real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_free)
-		real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_free(xs);
 out:
 	netdev_put(real_dev, &tracker);
 }
-- 
2.46.0


  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-04 13:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-04 13:11 [PATCHv4 net 0/3] bond: fix xfrm offload issues Hangbin Liu
2025-03-04 13:11 ` Hangbin Liu [this message]
2025-03-05  8:38   ` [PATCHv4 net 1/3] bonding: move IPsec deletion to bond_ipsec_free_sa Nikolay Aleksandrov
2025-03-05 14:13     ` Hangbin Liu
2025-03-05 16:12       ` Cosmin Ratiu
2025-03-06  9:37         ` Hangbin Liu
2025-03-06 10:02           ` Hangbin Liu
2025-03-06 13:29             ` Hangbin Liu
2025-03-06 13:37             ` Cosmin Ratiu
2025-03-07  2:39               ` Hangbin Liu
2025-03-06 13:04         ` Hangbin Liu
2025-03-04 13:11 ` [PATCHv4 net 2/3] bonding: fix xfrm offload feature setup on active-backup mode Hangbin Liu
2025-03-04 13:11 ` [PATCHv4 net 3/3] selftests: bonding: add ipsec offload test Hangbin Liu
2025-03-05 10:13   ` Petr Machata

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250304131120.31135-2-liuhangbin@gmail.com \
    --to=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=cratiu@nvidia.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=jarod@redhat.com \
    --cc=jianbol@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jv@jvosburgh.net \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=petrm@nvidia.com \
    --cc=razor@blackwall.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
    --cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).