From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jay Vosburgh <jv@jvosburgh.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>, Jianbo Liu <jianbol@nvidia.com>,
Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>,
Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@nvidia.com>, Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCHv5 net 1/3] bonding: fix calling sleeping function in spin lock and some race conditions
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 03:19:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250307031903.223973-2-liuhangbin@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250307031903.223973-1-liuhangbin@gmail.com>
The fixed commit placed mutex_lock() inside spin_lock_bh(), which triggers
a warning:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at...
Fix this by moving the IPsec deletion operation to bond_ipsec_free_sa,
which is not held by spin_lock_bh().
Additionally, there are also some race conditions as bond_ipsec_del_sa_all()
and __xfrm_state_delete could running in parallel without any lock.
e.g.
bond_ipsec_del_sa_all() __xfrm_state_delete()
- .xdo_dev_state_delete - bond_ipsec_del_sa()
- .xdo_dev_state_free - .xdo_dev_state_delete()
- bond_ipsec_free_sa()
bond active_slave changes - .xdo_dev_state_free()
bond_ipsec_add_sa_all()
- ipsec->xs->xso.real_dev = real_dev;
- xdo_dev_state_add
To fix this, let's add xs->lock during bond_ipsec_del_sa_all(), and delete
the IPsec list when the XFRM state is DEAD, which could prevent
xdo_dev_state_free() from being triggered again in bond_ipsec_free_sa().
In bond_ipsec_add_sa(), if .xdo_dev_state_add() failed, the xso.real_dev
is set without clean. Which will cause trouble if __xfrm_state_delete is
called at the same time. Reset the xso.real_dev to NULL if state add failed.
Despite the above fixes, there are still races in bond_ipsec_add_sa()
and bond_ipsec_add_sa_all(). If __xfrm_state_delete() is called immediately
after we set the xso.real_dev and before .xdo_dev_state_add() is finished,
like
ipsec->xs->xso.real_dev = real_dev;
__xfrm_state_delete
- bond_ipsec_del_sa()
- .xdo_dev_state_delete()
- bond_ipsec_free_sa()
- .xdo_dev_state_free()
.xdo_dev_state_add()
But there is no good solution yet. So I just added a FIXME note in here
and hope we can fix it in future.
Fixes: 2aeeef906d5a ("bonding: change ipsec_lock from spin lock to mutex")
Reported-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20241212062734.182a0164@kernel.org
Suggested-by: Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
---
drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index e45bba240cbc..dd3d0d41d98f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -506,6 +506,7 @@ static int bond_ipsec_add_sa(struct xfrm_state *xs,
list_add(&ipsec->list, &bond->ipsec_list);
mutex_unlock(&bond->ipsec_lock);
} else {
+ xs->xso.real_dev = NULL;
kfree(ipsec);
}
out:
@@ -541,7 +542,15 @@ static void bond_ipsec_add_sa_all(struct bonding *bond)
if (ipsec->xs->xso.real_dev == real_dev)
continue;
+ /* Skip dead xfrm states, they'll be freed later. */
+ if (ipsec->xs->km.state == XFRM_STATE_DEAD)
+ continue;
+
ipsec->xs->xso.real_dev = real_dev;
+ /* FIXME: there is a race that before .xdo_dev_state_add()
+ * is called, the __xfrm_state_delete() is called in parallel,
+ * which will call .xdo_dev_state_delete() and xdo_dev_state_free()
+ */
if (real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_add(ipsec->xs, NULL)) {
slave_warn(bond_dev, real_dev, "%s: failed to add SA\n", __func__);
ipsec->xs->xso.real_dev = NULL;
@@ -560,7 +569,6 @@ static void bond_ipsec_del_sa(struct xfrm_state *xs)
struct net_device *bond_dev = xs->xso.dev;
struct net_device *real_dev;
netdevice_tracker tracker;
- struct bond_ipsec *ipsec;
struct bonding *bond;
struct slave *slave;
@@ -592,22 +600,13 @@ static void bond_ipsec_del_sa(struct xfrm_state *xs)
real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_delete(xs);
out:
netdev_put(real_dev, &tracker);
- mutex_lock(&bond->ipsec_lock);
- list_for_each_entry(ipsec, &bond->ipsec_list, list) {
- if (ipsec->xs == xs) {
- list_del(&ipsec->list);
- kfree(ipsec);
- break;
- }
- }
- mutex_unlock(&bond->ipsec_lock);
}
static void bond_ipsec_del_sa_all(struct bonding *bond)
{
struct net_device *bond_dev = bond->dev;
+ struct bond_ipsec *ipsec, *tmp_ipsec;
struct net_device *real_dev;
- struct bond_ipsec *ipsec;
struct slave *slave;
slave = rtnl_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave);
@@ -616,9 +615,22 @@ static void bond_ipsec_del_sa_all(struct bonding *bond)
return;
mutex_lock(&bond->ipsec_lock);
- list_for_each_entry(ipsec, &bond->ipsec_list, list) {
- if (!ipsec->xs->xso.real_dev)
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(ipsec, tmp_ipsec, &bond->ipsec_list, list) {
+ spin_lock_bh(&ipsec->xs->lock);
+ if (!ipsec->xs->xso.real_dev) {
+ spin_unlock_bh(&ipsec->xs->lock);
continue;
+ }
+
+ if (ipsec->xs->km.state == XFRM_STATE_DEAD) {
+ list_del(&ipsec->list);
+ kfree(ipsec);
+ /* Need to free device here, or the xs->xso.real_dev
+ * may changed in bond_ipsec_add_sa_all and free
+ * on old device will never be called.
+ */
+ goto next;
+ }
if (!real_dev->xfrmdev_ops ||
!real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_delete ||
@@ -626,11 +638,20 @@ static void bond_ipsec_del_sa_all(struct bonding *bond)
slave_warn(bond_dev, real_dev,
"%s: no slave xdo_dev_state_delete\n",
__func__);
- } else {
- real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_delete(ipsec->xs);
- if (real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_free)
- real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_free(ipsec->xs);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&ipsec->xs->lock);
+ continue;
}
+
+ real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_delete(ipsec->xs);
+
+next:
+ /* set real_dev to NULL in case __xfrm_state_delete() is called in parallel */
+ ipsec->xs->xso.real_dev = NULL;
+
+ /* Unlock before freeing device state, it could sleep. */
+ spin_unlock_bh(&ipsec->xs->lock);
+ if (real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_free)
+ real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_free(ipsec->xs);
}
mutex_unlock(&bond->ipsec_lock);
}
@@ -638,6 +659,7 @@ static void bond_ipsec_del_sa_all(struct bonding *bond)
static void bond_ipsec_free_sa(struct xfrm_state *xs)
{
struct net_device *bond_dev = xs->xso.dev;
+ struct bond_ipsec *ipsec, *tmp_ipsec;
struct net_device *real_dev;
netdevice_tracker tracker;
struct bonding *bond;
@@ -659,13 +681,24 @@ static void bond_ipsec_free_sa(struct xfrm_state *xs)
if (!xs->xso.real_dev)
goto out;
- WARN_ON(xs->xso.real_dev != real_dev);
+ if (xs->xso.real_dev != real_dev)
+ goto out;
if (real_dev && real_dev->xfrmdev_ops &&
real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_free)
real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_free(xs);
out:
netdev_put(real_dev, &tracker);
+
+ mutex_lock(&bond->ipsec_lock);
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(ipsec, tmp_ipsec, &bond->ipsec_list, list) {
+ if (ipsec->xs == xs) {
+ list_del(&ipsec->list);
+ kfree(ipsec);
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ mutex_unlock(&bond->ipsec_lock);
}
/**
--
2.46.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-07 3:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-07 3:19 [PATCHv5 net 0/3] bond: fix xfrm offload issues Hangbin Liu
2025-03-07 3:19 ` Hangbin Liu [this message]
2025-03-07 7:42 ` [PATCHv5 net 1/3] bonding: fix calling sleeping function in spin lock and some race conditions Nikolay Aleksandrov
2025-03-07 8:11 ` Hangbin Liu
2025-03-07 8:33 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2025-03-07 10:31 ` Hangbin Liu
2025-03-07 17:03 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-10 7:53 ` Hangbin Liu
2025-03-11 21:08 ` Cosmin Ratiu
2025-03-12 1:04 ` Hangbin Liu
2025-03-08 8:54 ` Simon Horman
2025-03-10 7:22 ` Hangbin Liu
2025-03-07 3:19 ` [PATCHv5 net 2/3] bonding: fix xfrm offload feature setup on active-backup mode Hangbin Liu
2025-03-07 3:19 ` [PATCHv5 net 3/3] selftests: bonding: add ipsec offload test Hangbin Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250307031903.223973-2-liuhangbin@gmail.com \
--to=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=cratiu@nvidia.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jarod@redhat.com \
--cc=jianbol@nvidia.com \
--cc=jv@jvosburgh.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=petrm@nvidia.com \
--cc=razor@blackwall.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).