From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9651921D3D7; Fri, 7 Mar 2025 17:03:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741367014; cv=none; b=tR7veFQOZlHld37sfp5fh7FHwfRexOeg8a+BlJoaLalxXqMQXdOMUUub7iolPpZznVqUpGGMmq4PjqtmVhZTDBWc5NTDXBgDMBVMVWW/23FjmIC2ggJpbJSyE8ETGd5vjdgCh+sPHWlk5E1U59jKCb/Lj8hTldaglVNOUxBSw0U= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741367014; c=relaxed/simple; bh=XBbVJpPHg4+2H/f38CpCQLx2/GuGU/dn/gz42YpI29w=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=bbOMDC92sGdBucjDK+uIN8OPiWrcGFvYntF9jVnj/LAyEJ3Qtu9/2v4PlOcrK5ksSdA8odrccuhZdWJF1jSxGssyifgFU0lNCmsjG3QBL5sT4xX5Ch2BevmTkOXRRbUcKAVREVAtlZCncQzwJUBsKW719snX8Ygw0Hc9QjpZwSw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=sV9Hd4Yf; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="sV9Hd4Yf" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 82CF7C4CED1; Fri, 7 Mar 2025 17:03:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1741367014; bh=XBbVJpPHg4+2H/f38CpCQLx2/GuGU/dn/gz42YpI29w=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=sV9Hd4Yf9C49FE32tguBVSysvAGK55gV/SYBpBVyTUbVTgzKy6XQXMAkjzfUgcm9/ yC+p21WNf5WDyatZEYTIriHWbcpBLv3DXMppjSSCFpWtWzXYR+Coz7uhlly4lGCkS2 Y4Q8JYoBVhXAD30Cy6aRI4nK2hA29jMAZtWrkoaTAVtM++ne8uhqsAnrmcpjI0/KPw L/3qtIZkzWKPnVbUFWpDRzUDgtAGblMHA7G8m3uPxLT3wGkcycB74I1wWsix7ubqVo RigqULAA4BT8fJ2D8mXZ/JRoc//B0j1QskgHCSQxAvs0rtSUoM+5Nz9ZubnENo2Mny e8725pSMUaXMQ== Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 09:03:32 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Nikolay Aleksandrov Cc: Hangbin Liu , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jay Vosburgh , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , Shuah Khan , Tariq Toukan , Jianbo Liu , Jarod Wilson , Steffen Klassert , Cosmin Ratiu , Petr Machata , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 net 1/3] bonding: fix calling sleeping function in spin lock and some race conditions Message-ID: <20250307090332.5b556ebb@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <6dd52efd-3367-4a77-8e7b-7f73096bcb3f@blackwall.org> References: <20250307031903.223973-1-liuhangbin@gmail.com> <20250307031903.223973-2-liuhangbin@gmail.com> <6dd52efd-3367-4a77-8e7b-7f73096bcb3f@blackwall.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 7 Mar 2025 09:42:49 +0200 Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote: > TBH, keeping buggy code with a comment doesn't sound good to me. I'd rather remove this > support than tell people "good luck, it might crash". It's better to be safe until a > correct design is in place which takes care of these issues. That's my feeling too, FWIW. I think we knew about this issue for a while now, the longer we wait the more users we may disrupt with the revert.