From: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
edumazet@google.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,
michael.chan@broadcom.com, pavan.chebbi@broadcom.com,
horms@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Cc: almasrymina@google.com, asml.silence@gmail.com,
willemb@google.com, kaiyuanz@google.com, skhawaja@google.com,
sdf@fomichev.me, gospo@broadcom.com, somnath.kotur@broadcom.com,
dw@davidwei.uk, amritha.nambiar@intel.com,
xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com, ap420073@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH v3 net 4/8] eth: bnxt: do not update checksum in bnxt_xdp_build_skb()
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2025 13:42:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250309134219.91670-5-ap420073@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250309134219.91670-1-ap420073@gmail.com>
The bnxt_rx_pkt() updates ip_summed value at the end if checksum offload
is enabled.
When the XDP-MB program is attached and it returns XDP_PASS, the
bnxt_xdp_build_skb() is called to update skb_shared_info.
The main purpose of bnxt_xdp_build_skb() is to update skb_shared_info,
but it updates ip_summed value too if checksum offload is enabled.
This is actually duplicate work.
When the bnxt_rx_pkt() updates ip_summed value, it checks if ip_summed
is CHECKSUM_NONE or not.
It means that ip_summed should be CHECKSUM_NONE at this moment.
But ip_summed may already be updated to CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY in the
XDP-MB-PASS path.
So the by skb_checksum_none_assert() WARNS about it.
This is duplicate work and updating ip_summed in the
bnxt_xdp_build_skb() is not needed.
Splat looks like:
WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 5782 at ./include/linux/skbuff.h:5155 bnxt_rx_pkt+0x479b/0x7610 [bnxt_en]
Modules linked in: bnxt_re bnxt_en rdma_ucm rdma_cm iw_cm ib_cm ib_uverbs veth xt_nat xt_tcpudp xt_conntrack nft_chain_nat xt_MASQUERADE nf_]
CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 5782 Comm: socat Tainted: G W 6.14.0-rc4+ #27
Tainted: [W]=WARN
Hardware name: ASUS System Product Name/PRIME Z690-P D4, BIOS 0603 11/01/2021
RIP: 0010:bnxt_rx_pkt+0x479b/0x7610 [bnxt_en]
Code: 54 24 0c 4c 89 f1 4c 89 ff c1 ea 1f ff d3 0f 1f 00 49 89 c6 48 85 c0 0f 84 4c e5 ff ff 48 89 c7 e8 ca 3d a0 c8 e9 8f f4 ff ff <0f> 0b f
RSP: 0018:ffff88881ba09928 EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00000000c7590303 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 1ffff1104e7d1610 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffff8881c91300b8
RBP: ffff88881ba09b28 R08: ffff888273e8b0d0 R09: ffff888273e8b070
R10: ffff888273e8b010 R11: ffff888278b0f000 R12: ffff888273e8b080
R13: ffff8881c9130e00 R14: ffff8881505d3800 R15: ffff888273e8b000
FS: 00007f5a2e7be080(0000) GS:ffff88881ba00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007fff2e708ff8 CR3: 000000013e3b0000 CR4: 00000000007506f0
PKRU: 55555554
Call Trace:
<IRQ>
? __warn+0xcd/0x2f0
? bnxt_rx_pkt+0x479b/0x7610
? report_bug+0x326/0x3c0
? handle_bug+0x53/0xa0
? exc_invalid_op+0x14/0x50
? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20
? bnxt_rx_pkt+0x479b/0x7610
? bnxt_rx_pkt+0x3e41/0x7610
? __pfx_bnxt_rx_pkt+0x10/0x10
? napi_complete_done+0x2cf/0x7d0
__bnxt_poll_work+0x4e8/0x1220
? __pfx___bnxt_poll_work+0x10/0x10
? __pfx_mark_lock.part.0+0x10/0x10
bnxt_poll_p5+0x36a/0xfa0
? __pfx_bnxt_poll_p5+0x10/0x10
__napi_poll.constprop.0+0xa0/0x440
net_rx_action+0x899/0xd00
...
Following ping.py patch adds xdp-mb-pass case. so ping.py is going
to be able to reproduce this issue.
Fixes: 1dc4c557bfed ("bnxt: adding bnxt_xdp_build_skb to build skb from multibuffer xdp_buff")
Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com>
---
v3:
- No changes.
v2:
- Patch added.
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c | 3 ++-
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_xdp.c | 11 ++---------
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_xdp.h | 3 +--
3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
index 218109ee1c23..9afb2c5072b1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
@@ -2218,7 +2218,8 @@ static int bnxt_rx_pkt(struct bnxt *bp, struct bnxt_cp_ring_info *cpr,
if (!skb)
goto oom_next_rx;
} else {
- skb = bnxt_xdp_build_skb(bp, skb, agg_bufs, rxr->page_pool, &xdp, rxcmp1);
+ skb = bnxt_xdp_build_skb(bp, skb, agg_bufs,
+ rxr->page_pool, &xdp);
if (!skb) {
/* we should be able to free the old skb here */
bnxt_xdp_buff_frags_free(rxr, &xdp);
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_xdp.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_xdp.c
index e9b49cb5b735..299822cacca4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_xdp.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_xdp.c
@@ -460,20 +460,13 @@ int bnxt_xdp(struct net_device *dev, struct netdev_bpf *xdp)
struct sk_buff *
bnxt_xdp_build_skb(struct bnxt *bp, struct sk_buff *skb, u8 num_frags,
- struct page_pool *pool, struct xdp_buff *xdp,
- struct rx_cmp_ext *rxcmp1)
+ struct page_pool *pool, struct xdp_buff *xdp)
{
struct skb_shared_info *sinfo = xdp_get_shared_info_from_buff(xdp);
if (!skb)
return NULL;
- skb_checksum_none_assert(skb);
- if (RX_CMP_L4_CS_OK(rxcmp1)) {
- if (bp->dev->features & NETIF_F_RXCSUM) {
- skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
- skb->csum_level = RX_CMP_ENCAP(rxcmp1);
- }
- }
+
xdp_update_skb_shared_info(skb, num_frags,
sinfo->xdp_frags_size,
BNXT_RX_PAGE_SIZE * num_frags,
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_xdp.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_xdp.h
index 0122782400b8..220285e190fc 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_xdp.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_xdp.h
@@ -33,6 +33,5 @@ void bnxt_xdp_buff_frags_free(struct bnxt_rx_ring_info *rxr,
struct xdp_buff *xdp);
struct sk_buff *bnxt_xdp_build_skb(struct bnxt *bp, struct sk_buff *skb,
u8 num_frags, struct page_pool *pool,
- struct xdp_buff *xdp,
- struct rx_cmp_ext *rxcmp1);
+ struct xdp_buff *xdp);
#endif
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-09 13:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-09 13:42 [PATCH v3 net 0/8] eth: bnxt: fix several bugs in the bnxt module Taehee Yoo
2025-03-09 13:42 ` [PATCH v3 net 1/8] eth: bnxt: fix truesize for mb-xdp-pass case Taehee Yoo
2025-03-09 13:42 ` [PATCH v3 net 2/8] eth: bnxt: return fail if interface is down in bnxt_queue_mem_alloc() Taehee Yoo
2025-03-09 21:44 ` Mina Almasry
2025-03-10 2:10 ` Taehee Yoo
2025-03-10 20:30 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-09 13:42 ` [PATCH v3 net 3/8] eth: bnxt: do not use BNXT_VNIC_NTUPLE unconditionally in queue restart logic Taehee Yoo
2025-03-09 13:42 ` Taehee Yoo [this message]
2025-03-10 2:58 ` [PATCH v3 net 4/8] eth: bnxt: do not update checksum in bnxt_xdp_build_skb() Somnath Kotur
2025-03-09 13:42 ` [PATCH v3 net 5/8] eth: bnxt: fix kernel panic in the bnxt_get_queue_stats{rx | tx} Taehee Yoo
2025-03-10 2:59 ` Somnath Kotur
2025-03-09 13:42 ` [PATCH v3 net 6/8] eth: bnxt: fix memory leak in queue reset Taehee Yoo
2025-03-09 13:42 ` [PATCH v3 net 7/8] net: devmem: do not WARN conditionally after netdev_rx_queue_restart() Taehee Yoo
2025-03-09 21:45 ` Mina Almasry
2025-03-09 13:42 ` [PATCH v3 net 8/8] selftests: drv-net: add xdp cases for ping.py Taehee Yoo
2025-03-10 20:40 ` [PATCH v3 net 0/8] eth: bnxt: fix several bugs in the bnxt module patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250309134219.91670-5-ap420073@gmail.com \
--to=ap420073@gmail.com \
--cc=almasrymina@google.com \
--cc=amritha.nambiar@intel.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dw@davidwei.uk \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gospo@broadcom.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kaiyuanz@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.chan@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pavan.chebbi@broadcom.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=skhawaja@google.com \
--cc=somnath.kotur@broadcom.com \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).