From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Chiachang Wang <chiachangwang@google.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, steffen.klassert@secunet.com,
stanleyjhu@google.com, yumike@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH ipsec-next v4 2/2] xfrm: Refactor migration setup during the cloning process
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 13:52:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250310115226.GD7027@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250310091620.2706700-3-chiachangwang@google.com>
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 09:16:20AM +0000, Chiachang Wang wrote:
> Previously, migration related setup, such as updating family,
> destination address, and source address, was performed after
> the clone was created in `xfrm_state_migrate`. This change
> moves this setup into the cloning function itself, improving
> code locality and reducing redundancy.
>
> The `xfrm_state_clone_and_setup` function now conditionally
> applies the migration parameters from struct xfrm_migrate
> if it is provided. This allows the function to be used both
> for simple cloning and for cloning with migration setup.
>
> Test: Tested with kernel test in the Android tree located
> in https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/tests/
> The xfrm_tunnel_test.py under the tests folder in
> particular.
> Signed-off-by: Chiachang Wang <chiachangwang@google.com>
> ---
> net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
> index 9cd707362767..0365daedea32 100644
> --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
> +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
> @@ -1958,8 +1958,9 @@ static inline int clone_security(struct xfrm_state *x, struct xfrm_sec_ctx *secu
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static struct xfrm_state *xfrm_state_clone(struct xfrm_state *orig,
> - struct xfrm_encap_tmpl *encap)
> +static struct xfrm_state *xfrm_state_clone_and_setup(struct xfrm_state *orig,
> + struct xfrm_encap_tmpl *encap,
> + struct xfrm_migrate *m)
> {
> struct net *net = xs_net(orig);
> struct xfrm_state *x = xfrm_state_alloc(net);
> @@ -2058,6 +2059,12 @@ static struct xfrm_state *xfrm_state_clone(struct xfrm_state *orig,
> goto error;
> }
>
> + if (m) {
Why do you need this "if (m)"? "m" should be valid at this stage.
Thanks
> + x->props.family = m->new_family;
> + memcpy(&x->id.daddr, &m->new_daddr, sizeof(x->id.daddr));
> + memcpy(&x->props.saddr, &m->new_saddr, sizeof(x->props.saddr));
> + }
> +
> return x;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-10 11:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-10 9:16 [PATCH ipsec-next v4 0/2] Update offload configuration with SA Chiachang Wang
2025-03-10 9:16 ` [PATCH ipsec-next v4 1/2] xfrm: Migrate offload configuration Chiachang Wang
2025-03-10 11:54 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-03-10 9:16 ` [PATCH ipsec-next v4 2/2] xfrm: Refactor migration setup during the cloning process Chiachang Wang
2025-03-10 11:52 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2025-03-10 12:20 ` Chiachang Wang
2025-03-12 13:00 ` Leon Romanovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250310115226.GD7027@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=chiachangwang@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stanleyjhu@google.com \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
--cc=yumike@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).