netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
To: Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: I Hsin Cheng <richard120310@gmail.com>,
	alibuda@linux.alibaba.com, jaka@linux.ibm.com,
	mjambigi@linux.ibm.com, sidraya@linux.ibm.com,
	tonylu@linux.alibaba.com, guwen@linux.alibaba.com,
	davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
	jserv@ccns.ncku.edu.tw, linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/smc: Reduce size of smc_wr_tx_tasklet_fn
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 14:56:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250317135631.21754E85-hca@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <66ce34a0-b79d-4ef0-bdd5-982e139571f1@linux.ibm.com>

On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 12:22:46PM +0100, Wenjia Zhang wrote:
> 
> 
> On 15.03.25 07:25, I Hsin Cheng wrote:
> > The variable "polled" in smc_wr_tx_tasklet_fn is a counter to determine
> > whether the loop has been executed for the first time. Refactor the type
> > of "polled" from "int" to "bool" can reduce the size of generated code
> > size by 12 bytes shown with the test below
> > 
> > $ ./scripts/bloat-o-meter vmlinux_old vmlinux_new
> > add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/1 up/down: 0/-12 (-12)
> > Function                                     old     new   delta
> > smc_wr_tx_tasklet_fn                        1076    1064     -12
> > Total: Before=24795091, After=24795079, chg -0.00%
> > 
> > In some configuration, the compiler will complain this function for
> > exceeding 1024 bytes for function stack, this change can at least reduce
> > the size by 12 bytes within manner.
> > 
> The code itself looks good. However, I’m curious about the specific
> situation where the compiler complained. Also, compared to exceeding the
> function stack limit by 1024 bytes, I don’t see how saving 12 bytes would
> bring any significant benefit.

The patch description doesn't make sense: bloat-a-meter prints the _text
size_ difference of two kernels, which really has nothing to do with
potential stack size savings.

If there are any changes in stack size with this patch is unknown; at least
if you rely only on the patch description.

You may want to have a look at scripts/stackusage and scripts/stackdelta.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-17 13:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-15  6:25 [PATCH] net/smc: Reduce size of smc_wr_tx_tasklet_fn I Hsin Cheng
2025-03-17  1:34 ` Dust Li
2025-03-17 11:22 ` Wenjia Zhang
2025-03-17 13:56   ` Heiko Carstens [this message]
2025-03-18  8:43     ` Wenjia Zhang
2025-03-19  2:42       ` I Hsin Cheng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250317135631.21754E85-hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=alibuda@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=guwen@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=jaka@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jserv@ccns.ncku.edu.tw \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjambigi@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=richard120310@gmail.com \
    --cc=sidraya@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=tonylu@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=wenjia@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).