From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>,
Amit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com>,
mlxsw@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 6/6] selftests: vxlan_bridge: Test flood with unresolved FDB entry
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 16:00:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250320160045.GI889584@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7bc96e317531f3bf06319fb2ea447bd8666f29fa.1742224300.git.petrm@nvidia.com>
On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 06:37:31PM +0100, Petr Machata wrote:
> From: Amit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com>
>
> Extend flood test to configure FDB entry with unresolved destination IP,
> check that packets are not sent twice.
>
> Without the previous patch which handles such scenario in mlxsw, the
> tests fail:
>
> $ TESTS='test_flood' ./vxlan_bridge_1d.sh
> Running tests with UDP port 4789
> TEST: VXLAN: flood [ OK ]
> TEST: VXLAN: flood, unresolved FDB entry [FAIL]
> vx2 ns2: Expected to capture 10 packets, got 20.
>
> $ TESTS='test_flood' ./vxlan_bridge_1q.sh
> INFO: Running tests with UDP port 4789
> TEST: VXLAN: flood vlan 10 [ OK ]
> TEST: VXLAN: flood vlan 20 [ OK ]
> TEST: VXLAN: flood vlan 10, unresolved FDB entry [FAIL]
> vx10 ns2: Expected to capture 10 packets, got 20.
> TEST: VXLAN: flood vlan 20, unresolved FDB entry [FAIL]
> vx20 ns2: Expected to capture 10 packets, got 20.
>
> With the previous patch, the tests pass.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-20 16:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-17 17:37 [PATCH net-next 0/6] mlxsw: Add VXLAN to the same hardware domain as physical bridge ports Petr Machata
2025-03-17 17:37 ` [PATCH net-next 1/6] mlxsw: Trap ARP packets at layer 2 instead of layer 3 Petr Machata
2025-03-20 15:57 ` Simon Horman
2025-03-17 17:37 ` [PATCH net-next 2/6] mlxsw: spectrum: Call mlxsw_sp_bridge_vxlan_{join, leave}() for VLAN-aware bridge Petr Machata
2025-03-20 15:58 ` Simon Horman
2025-03-17 17:37 ` [PATCH net-next 3/6] mlxsw: spectrum_switchdev: Add an internal API for VXLAN leave Petr Machata
2025-03-20 15:58 ` Simon Horman
2025-03-17 17:37 ` [PATCH net-next 4/6] mlxsw: spectrum_switchdev: Move mlxsw_sp_bridge_vxlan_join() Petr Machata
2025-03-20 15:58 ` Simon Horman
2025-03-17 17:37 ` [PATCH net-next 5/6] mlxsw: Add VXLAN bridge ports to same hardware domain as physical bridge ports Petr Machata
2025-03-20 16:00 ` Simon Horman
2025-03-17 17:37 ` [PATCH net-next 6/6] selftests: vxlan_bridge: Test flood with unresolved FDB entry Petr Machata
2025-03-20 16:00 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2025-03-24 22:20 ` [PATCH net-next 0/6] mlxsw: Add VXLAN to the same hardware domain as physical bridge ports patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250320160045.GI889584@horms.kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=amcohen@nvidia.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=mlxsw@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=petrm@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).