From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@gmail.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v1 net-next 13/13] ipv6: Get rid of RTNL for SIOCADDRT and RTM_NEWROUTE.
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 21:00:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250321040131.21057-14-kuniyu@amazon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250321040131.21057-1-kuniyu@amazon.com>
Now we are ready to remove RTNL from SIOCADDRT and RTM_NEWROUTE.
The remaining things to do are
1. pass false to lwtunnel_valid_encap_type_attr()
2. use rcu_dereference_rtnl() in fib6_check_nexthop()
3. place rcu_read_lock() before ip6_route_info_create_nh().
Let's complete RTNL-free conversion.
When each CPU-X adds 100000 routes on table-X in a batch on
c7a.metal-48xl EC2 instance with 192 CPUs,
without this series:
$ sudo ./route_test.sh
...
added 19200000 routes (100000 routes * 192 tables).
Time elapsed: 189154 milliseconds.
with this series:
$ sudo ./route_test.sh
...
added 19200000 routes (100000 routes * 192 tables).
Time elapsed: 62531 milliseconds.
Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
---
net/ipv4/nexthop.c | 4 ++--
net/ipv6/route.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/nexthop.c b/net/ipv4/nexthop.c
index 94eab81bfe54..dec1a107aa0b 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/nexthop.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/nexthop.c
@@ -1543,12 +1543,12 @@ int fib6_check_nexthop(struct nexthop *nh, struct fib6_config *cfg,
if (nh->is_group) {
struct nh_group *nhg;
- nhg = rtnl_dereference(nh->nh_grp);
+ nhg = rcu_dereference_rtnl(nh->nh_grp);
if (nhg->has_v4)
goto no_v4_nh;
is_fdb_nh = nhg->fdb_nh;
} else {
- nhi = rtnl_dereference(nh->nh_info);
+ nhi = rcu_dereference_rtnl(nh->nh_info);
if (nhi->family == AF_INET)
goto no_v4_nh;
is_fdb_nh = nhi->fdb_nh;
diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
index a209d8c8ff75..d1d60415d1aa 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
@@ -3868,12 +3868,16 @@ int ip6_route_add(struct fib6_config *cfg, gfp_t gfp_flags,
if (IS_ERR(rt))
return PTR_ERR(rt);
+ rcu_read_lock();
+
err = ip6_route_info_create_nh(rt, cfg, extack);
if (err)
- return err;
+ goto unlock;
err = __ip6_ins_rt(rt, &cfg->fc_nlinfo, extack);
fib6_info_release(rt);
+unlock:
+ rcu_read_unlock();
return err;
}
@@ -4494,12 +4498,10 @@ int ipv6_route_ioctl(struct net *net, unsigned int cmd, struct in6_rtmsg *rtmsg)
switch (cmd) {
case SIOCADDRT:
- rtnl_lock();
/* Only do the default setting of fc_metric in route adding */
if (cfg.fc_metric == 0)
cfg.fc_metric = IP6_RT_PRIO_USER;
err = ip6_route_add(&cfg, GFP_KERNEL, NULL);
- rtnl_unlock();
break;
case SIOCDELRT:
err = ip6_route_del(&cfg, NULL);
@@ -5078,7 +5080,7 @@ static int rtm_to_fib6_multipath_config(struct fib6_config *cfg,
} while (rtnh_ok(rtnh, remaining));
return lwtunnel_valid_encap_type_attr(cfg->fc_mp, cfg->fc_mp_len,
- extack, newroute);
+ extack, false);
}
static int rtm_to_fib6_config(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
@@ -5216,7 +5218,7 @@ static int rtm_to_fib6_config(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
cfg->fc_encap_type = nla_get_u16(tb[RTA_ENCAP_TYPE]);
err = lwtunnel_valid_encap_type(cfg->fc_encap_type,
- extack, newroute);
+ extack, false);
if (err < 0)
goto errout;
}
@@ -5483,6 +5485,8 @@ static int ip6_route_multipath_add(struct fib6_config *cfg,
if (err)
return err;
+ rcu_read_lock();
+
err = ip6_route_mpath_info_create_nh(&rt6_nh_list, extack);
if (err)
goto cleanup;
@@ -5574,6 +5578,8 @@ static int ip6_route_multipath_add(struct fib6_config *cfg,
}
cleanup:
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
list_for_each_entry_safe(nh, nh_safe, &rt6_nh_list, next) {
fib6_info_release(nh->fib6_info);
list_del(&nh->next);
@@ -6856,7 +6862,7 @@ static void bpf_iter_unregister(void)
static const struct rtnl_msg_handler ip6_route_rtnl_msg_handlers[] __initconst_or_module = {
{.owner = THIS_MODULE, .protocol = PF_INET6, .msgtype = RTM_NEWROUTE,
- .doit = inet6_rtm_newroute},
+ .doit = inet6_rtm_newroute, .flags = RTNL_FLAG_DOIT_UNLOCKED},
{.owner = THIS_MODULE, .protocol = PF_INET6, .msgtype = RTM_DELROUTE,
.doit = inet6_rtm_delroute, .flags = RTNL_FLAG_DOIT_UNLOCKED},
{.owner = THIS_MODULE, .protocol = PF_INET6, .msgtype = RTM_GETROUTE,
--
2.48.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-21 4:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-21 4:00 [PATCH v1 net-next 00/13] ipv6: No RTNL for IPv6 routing table Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-03-21 4:00 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 01/13] ipv6: Validate RTA_GATEWAY of RTA_MULTIPATH in rtm_to_fib6_config() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-03-21 4:00 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 02/13] ipv6: Get rid of RTNL for SIOCDELRT and RTM_DELROUTE Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-03-21 4:00 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 03/13] ipv6: Move some validation from ip6_route_info_create() to rtm_to_fib6_config() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-03-21 4:00 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 04/13] ipv6: Check GATEWAY in rtm_to_fib6_multipath_config() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-03-21 4:00 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 05/13] ipv6: Move nexthop_find_by_id() after fib6_info_alloc() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-03-21 4:00 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 06/13] ipv6: Split ip6_route_info_create() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-03-21 4:00 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 07/13] ipv6: Preallocate rt->fib6_nh->rt6i_pcpu in ip6_route_info_create() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-03-21 4:00 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 08/13] ipv6: Preallocate nhc_pcpu_rth_output " Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-03-21 4:00 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 09/13] ipv6: Don't pass net to ip6_route_info_append() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-03-21 4:00 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 10/13] ipv6: Factorise ip6_route_multipath_add() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-03-21 4:00 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 11/13] ipv6: Protect fib6_link_table() with spinlock Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-03-21 4:00 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 12/13] ipv6: Protect nh->f6i_list with spinlock and flag Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-03-21 4:00 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima [this message]
2025-03-21 14:07 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 00/13] ipv6: No RTNL for IPv6 routing table Stanislav Fomichev
2025-03-21 16:50 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250321040131.21057-14-kuniyu@amazon.com \
--to=kuniyu@amazon.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuni1840@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).