From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@gmail.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v1 net-next 04/13] ipv6: Check GATEWAY in rtm_to_fib6_multipath_config().
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 21:00:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250321040131.21057-5-kuniyu@amazon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250321040131.21057-1-kuniyu@amazon.com>
In ip6_route_multipath_add(), we call rt6_qualify_for_ecmp() for each
entry. If it returns false, the request fails.
rt6_qualify_for_ecmp() returns false if either of the conditions below
is true:
1. f6i->fib6_flags has RTF_ADDRCONF
2. f6i->nh is not NULL
3. f6i->fib6_nh->fib_nh_gw_family is AF_UNSPEC
1 is unnecessary because rtm_to_fib6_config() never sets RTF_ADDRCONF
to cfg->fc_flags.
2. is equivalent with cfg->fc_nh_id.
3. can be replaced by checking RTF_GATEWAY in the base and each multipath
entry because AF_INET6 is set to f6i->fib6_nh->fib_nh_gw_family only when
cfg.fc_is_fdb is true or RTF_GATEWAY is set, but the former is always
false.
Let's perform the equivalent checks in rtm_to_fib6_multipath_config().
Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
---
net/ipv6/route.c | 16 +++++++++-------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
index baad02c099ff..b51793ee7a18 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
@@ -4996,6 +4996,7 @@ static int rtm_to_fib6_multipath_config(struct fib6_config *cfg,
}
do {
+ bool has_gateway = cfg->fc_flags & RTF_GATEWAY;
int attrlen = rtnh_attrlen(rtnh);
if (attrlen > 0) {
@@ -5009,9 +5010,17 @@ static int rtm_to_fib6_multipath_config(struct fib6_config *cfg,
"Invalid IPv6 address in RTA_GATEWAY");
return -EINVAL;
}
+
+ has_gateway = true;
}
}
+ if (newroute && (cfg->fc_nh_id || !has_gateway)) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack,
+ "Device only routes can not be added for IPv6 using the multipath API.");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
rtnh = rtnh_next(rtnh, &remaining);
} while (rtnh_ok(rtnh, remaining));
@@ -5353,13 +5362,6 @@ static int ip6_route_multipath_add(struct fib6_config *cfg,
rt = NULL;
goto cleanup;
}
- if (!rt6_qualify_for_ecmp(rt)) {
- err = -EINVAL;
- NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack,
- "Device only routes can not be added for IPv6 using the multipath API.");
- fib6_info_release(rt);
- goto cleanup;
- }
rt->fib6_nh->fib_nh_weight = rtnh->rtnh_hops + 1;
--
2.48.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-21 4:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-21 4:00 [PATCH v1 net-next 00/13] ipv6: No RTNL for IPv6 routing table Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-03-21 4:00 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 01/13] ipv6: Validate RTA_GATEWAY of RTA_MULTIPATH in rtm_to_fib6_config() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-03-21 4:00 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 02/13] ipv6: Get rid of RTNL for SIOCDELRT and RTM_DELROUTE Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-03-21 4:00 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 03/13] ipv6: Move some validation from ip6_route_info_create() to rtm_to_fib6_config() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-03-21 4:00 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima [this message]
2025-03-21 4:00 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 05/13] ipv6: Move nexthop_find_by_id() after fib6_info_alloc() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-03-21 4:00 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 06/13] ipv6: Split ip6_route_info_create() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-03-21 4:00 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 07/13] ipv6: Preallocate rt->fib6_nh->rt6i_pcpu in ip6_route_info_create() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-03-21 4:00 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 08/13] ipv6: Preallocate nhc_pcpu_rth_output " Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-03-21 4:00 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 09/13] ipv6: Don't pass net to ip6_route_info_append() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-03-21 4:00 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 10/13] ipv6: Factorise ip6_route_multipath_add() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-03-21 4:00 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 11/13] ipv6: Protect fib6_link_table() with spinlock Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-03-21 4:00 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 12/13] ipv6: Protect nh->f6i_list with spinlock and flag Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-03-21 4:00 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 13/13] ipv6: Get rid of RTNL for SIOCADDRT and RTM_NEWROUTE Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-03-21 14:07 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 00/13] ipv6: No RTNL for IPv6 routing table Stanislav Fomichev
2025-03-21 16:50 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250321040131.21057-5-kuniyu@amazon.com \
--to=kuniyu@amazon.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuni1840@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).