From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE09F26136E; Mon, 24 Mar 2025 18:34:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742841294; cv=none; b=eT9qutuFfltrTkCOEiAD3fZod6C7vFJoGN6BQ9Qbq/XK/toXgc6byUqb/a1+NQLZ21reHrYmXnWrAB6Xay4WBgD1xQ8odgjmihXZxtUq5j2JjkpTmj2rFhtxnLwSxnrjIg73DL9IUr85hv8DTddpeGvWQMIAU14gEd5YxtOQLGg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742841294; c=relaxed/simple; bh=y0BX7r8ryEWjMxOOO9xrdurEHkOyQxtBaLfq3+2msBM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Ye8WxbRUsLL+cLokncJrgwgM6WA0QWITeYGIj8E1FKZNkbgIU/5OzRSzMZ0sA0SavqIaqN+KD3zeJI/fyusEmWwNibjO3Heq752JbUxm5EMT6xFA5iWd1f488noSuZCjzp/LDOtqVRQkwlD5gGhguPvnAi5XgffDShrTOu5Kh8M= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=C1ndWjuC; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="C1ndWjuC" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E7E7DC4CEDD; Mon, 24 Mar 2025 18:34:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1742841292; bh=y0BX7r8ryEWjMxOOO9xrdurEHkOyQxtBaLfq3+2msBM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=C1ndWjuCBM1XTyGk+PbUv3bAeqUBsI3f24qAxf75F3b2S0gBLd/gxLK1M8CTwycGR EGEq+rV4FcPUlMjmWU4JOpNtB3XdC+BC5Jqn9AAWoZ5lDVqq8C96oFOiv6LAfclzM5 Z2EopyxqpZmamZ0gLvM6yuMsAzi8tCP7HkvlvRs9ytQICu82Vq+ySL3Sd7/Xzemijt qMHfgbc0K18Rxf7iYK4nD0HtFXlIfQcqfY4OUCdg3e006ueekYleJb46lZO21O9bY0 Kv7yZS3Qa03m826wLjqxcA2B7ONVeKA16uJ7ok2OJ6CqFsdByI733foISPHls3XQqG Sj0nP2/SznzyQ== Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 11:34:43 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Qingfang Deng Cc: Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Maxime Coquelin , Alexandre Torgue , Ong Boon Leong , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] net: stmmac: Fix accessing freed irq affinity_hint Message-ID: <20250324113443.215c036f@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20250318032424.112067-1-dqfext@gmail.com> References: <20250318032424.112067-1-dqfext@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 11:24:23 +0800 Qingfang Deng wrote: > - cpumask_clear(&cpu_mask); > - cpumask_set_cpu(i % num_online_cpus(), &cpu_mask); > - irq_set_affinity_hint(priv->rx_irq[i], &cpu_mask); > + irq_set_affinity_hint(priv->rx_irq[i], > + cpumask_of(i % num_online_cpus())); This does fix the bug you're targeting, but FWIW num_online_cpus() is not great in general. The online CPU mask can be sparse. You may want to look into finding 'nth' online CPU instead of the naive modulo as a follow up.