netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
	andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 00/11] net: skip taking rtnl_lock for queue GET
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 15:45:26 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250324224537.248800-1-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)

Skip taking rtnl_lock for queue GET ops on devices which opt
into running all ops under the instance lock.

This fixes and completes Stan's ops-locking work, so I think
for sanity / ease of backporting fixes we should merge it for
v6.15.

v2:
 - rebase
 - only clear XSK if netdev still set
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/20250312223507.805719-1-kuba@kernel.org

Jakub Kicinski (11):
  net: bubble up taking netdev instance lock to callers of
    net_devmem_unbind_dmabuf()
  net: remove netif_set_real_num_rx_queues() helper for when SYSFS=n
  net: constify dev pointer in misc instance lock helpers
  net: explain "protection types" for the instance lock
  net: designate queue counts as "double ops protected" by instance lock
  net: designate queue -> napi linking as "ops protected"
  net: protect rxq->mp_params with the instance lock
  net: make NETDEV_UNREGISTER and instance lock more consistent
  net: designate XSK pool pointers in queues as "ops protected"
  netdev: add "ops compat locking" helpers
  netdev: don't hold rtnl_lock over nl queue info get when possible

 include/linux/netdevice.h     | 41 ++++++++++++---------
 include/net/netdev_lock.h     | 36 ++++++++++++++++--
 include/net/netdev_rx_queue.h |  6 +--
 net/core/dev.h                | 15 ++++++++
 net/core/dev.c                | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 net/core/devmem.c             |  2 -
 net/core/net-sysfs.c          |  2 +
 net/core/netdev-genl.c        | 27 ++++++++------
 net/core/netdev_rx_queue.c    |  3 ++
 net/core/page_pool.c          |  7 +---
 net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c       |  7 +++-
 11 files changed, 165 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)

-- 
2.49.0


             reply	other threads:[~2025-03-24 22:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-24 22:45 Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 01/11] net: bubble up taking netdev instance lock to callers of net_devmem_unbind_dmabuf() Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-25  5:19   ` Mina Almasry
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 02/11] net: remove netif_set_real_num_rx_queues() helper for when SYSFS=n Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 03/11] net: constify dev pointer in misc instance lock helpers Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 04/11] net: explain "protection types" for the instance lock Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 05/11] net: designate queue counts as "double ops protected" by " Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 06/11] net: designate queue -> napi linking as "ops protected" Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 07/11] net: protect rxq->mp_params with the instance lock Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-25  5:34   ` Mina Almasry
2025-03-25  9:50     ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 08/11] net: make NETDEV_UNREGISTER and instance lock more consistent Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-25 12:17   ` Cosmin Ratiu
2025-03-25 17:04     ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 09/11] net: designate XSK pool pointers in queues as "ops protected" Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 10/11] netdev: add "ops compat locking" helpers Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 11/11] netdev: don't hold rtnl_lock over nl queue info get when possible Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-25  4:04 ` [PATCH net-next v2 00/11] net: skip taking rtnl_lock for queue GET Stanislav Fomichev
2025-03-25 17:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250324224537.248800-1-kuba@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).