From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 00/11] net: skip taking rtnl_lock for queue GET
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 15:45:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250324224537.248800-1-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
Skip taking rtnl_lock for queue GET ops on devices which opt
into running all ops under the instance lock.
This fixes and completes Stan's ops-locking work, so I think
for sanity / ease of backporting fixes we should merge it for
v6.15.
v2:
- rebase
- only clear XSK if netdev still set
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/20250312223507.805719-1-kuba@kernel.org
Jakub Kicinski (11):
net: bubble up taking netdev instance lock to callers of
net_devmem_unbind_dmabuf()
net: remove netif_set_real_num_rx_queues() helper for when SYSFS=n
net: constify dev pointer in misc instance lock helpers
net: explain "protection types" for the instance lock
net: designate queue counts as "double ops protected" by instance lock
net: designate queue -> napi linking as "ops protected"
net: protect rxq->mp_params with the instance lock
net: make NETDEV_UNREGISTER and instance lock more consistent
net: designate XSK pool pointers in queues as "ops protected"
netdev: add "ops compat locking" helpers
netdev: don't hold rtnl_lock over nl queue info get when possible
include/linux/netdevice.h | 41 ++++++++++++---------
include/net/netdev_lock.h | 36 ++++++++++++++++--
include/net/netdev_rx_queue.h | 6 +--
net/core/dev.h | 15 ++++++++
net/core/dev.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
net/core/devmem.c | 2 -
net/core/net-sysfs.c | 2 +
net/core/netdev-genl.c | 27 ++++++++------
net/core/netdev_rx_queue.c | 3 ++
net/core/page_pool.c | 7 +---
net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c | 7 +++-
11 files changed, 165 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
--
2.49.0
next reply other threads:[~2025-03-24 22:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-24 22:45 Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 01/11] net: bubble up taking netdev instance lock to callers of net_devmem_unbind_dmabuf() Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-25 5:19 ` Mina Almasry
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 02/11] net: remove netif_set_real_num_rx_queues() helper for when SYSFS=n Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 03/11] net: constify dev pointer in misc instance lock helpers Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 04/11] net: explain "protection types" for the instance lock Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 05/11] net: designate queue counts as "double ops protected" by " Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 06/11] net: designate queue -> napi linking as "ops protected" Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 07/11] net: protect rxq->mp_params with the instance lock Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-25 5:34 ` Mina Almasry
2025-03-25 9:50 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 08/11] net: make NETDEV_UNREGISTER and instance lock more consistent Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-25 12:17 ` Cosmin Ratiu
2025-03-25 17:04 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 09/11] net: designate XSK pool pointers in queues as "ops protected" Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 10/11] netdev: add "ops compat locking" helpers Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 11/11] netdev: don't hold rtnl_lock over nl queue info get when possible Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-25 4:04 ` [PATCH net-next v2 00/11] net: skip taking rtnl_lock for queue GET Stanislav Fomichev
2025-03-25 17:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250324224537.248800-1-kuba@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).