From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 11/11] netdev: don't hold rtnl_lock over nl queue info get when possible
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 15:45:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250324224537.248800-12-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250324224537.248800-1-kuba@kernel.org>
Netdev queue dump accesses: NAPI, memory providers, XSk pointers.
All three are "ops protected" now, switch to the op compat locking.
rtnl lock does not have to be taken for "ops locked" devices.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
---
net/core/netdev-genl.c | 18 +++++++-----------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/netdev-genl.c b/net/core/netdev-genl.c
index fd1cfa9707dc..39f52a311f07 100644
--- a/net/core/netdev-genl.c
+++ b/net/core/netdev-genl.c
@@ -481,18 +481,15 @@ int netdev_nl_queue_get_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
if (!rsp)
return -ENOMEM;
- rtnl_lock();
-
- netdev = netdev_get_by_index_lock(genl_info_net(info), ifindex);
+ netdev = netdev_get_by_index_lock_ops_compat(genl_info_net(info),
+ ifindex);
if (netdev) {
err = netdev_nl_queue_fill(rsp, netdev, q_id, q_type, info);
- netdev_unlock(netdev);
+ netdev_unlock_ops_compat(netdev);
} else {
err = -ENODEV;
}
- rtnl_unlock();
-
if (err)
goto err_free_msg;
@@ -541,17 +538,17 @@ int netdev_nl_queue_get_dumpit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
if (info->attrs[NETDEV_A_QUEUE_IFINDEX])
ifindex = nla_get_u32(info->attrs[NETDEV_A_QUEUE_IFINDEX]);
- rtnl_lock();
if (ifindex) {
- netdev = netdev_get_by_index_lock(net, ifindex);
+ netdev = netdev_get_by_index_lock_ops_compat(net, ifindex);
if (netdev) {
err = netdev_nl_queue_dump_one(netdev, skb, info, ctx);
- netdev_unlock(netdev);
+ netdev_unlock_ops_compat(netdev);
} else {
err = -ENODEV;
}
} else {
- for_each_netdev_lock_scoped(net, netdev, ctx->ifindex) {
+ for_each_netdev_lock_ops_compat_scoped(net, netdev,
+ ctx->ifindex) {
err = netdev_nl_queue_dump_one(netdev, skb, info, ctx);
if (err < 0)
break;
@@ -559,7 +556,6 @@ int netdev_nl_queue_get_dumpit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
ctx->txq_idx = 0;
}
}
- rtnl_unlock();
return err;
}
--
2.49.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-24 22:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-24 22:45 [PATCH net-next v2 00/11] net: skip taking rtnl_lock for queue GET Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 01/11] net: bubble up taking netdev instance lock to callers of net_devmem_unbind_dmabuf() Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-25 5:19 ` Mina Almasry
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 02/11] net: remove netif_set_real_num_rx_queues() helper for when SYSFS=n Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 03/11] net: constify dev pointer in misc instance lock helpers Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 04/11] net: explain "protection types" for the instance lock Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 05/11] net: designate queue counts as "double ops protected" by " Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 06/11] net: designate queue -> napi linking as "ops protected" Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 07/11] net: protect rxq->mp_params with the instance lock Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-25 5:34 ` Mina Almasry
2025-03-25 9:50 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 08/11] net: make NETDEV_UNREGISTER and instance lock more consistent Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-25 12:17 ` Cosmin Ratiu
2025-03-25 17:04 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 09/11] net: designate XSK pool pointers in queues as "ops protected" Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 10/11] netdev: add "ops compat locking" helpers Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-03-25 4:04 ` [PATCH net-next v2 00/11] net: skip taking rtnl_lock for queue GET Stanislav Fomichev
2025-03-25 17:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250324224537.248800-12-kuba@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).