From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 01/11] net: bubble up taking netdev instance lock to callers of net_devmem_unbind_dmabuf()
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 15:45:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250324224537.248800-2-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250324224537.248800-1-kuba@kernel.org>
A recent commit added taking the netdev instance lock
in netdev_nl_bind_rx_doit(), but didn't remove it in
net_devmem_unbind_dmabuf() which it calls from an error path.
Always expect the callers of net_devmem_unbind_dmabuf() to
hold the lock. This is consistent with net_devmem_bind_dmabuf().
(Not so) coincidentally this also protects mp_param with the instance
lock, which the rest of this series needs.
Fixes: 1d22d3060b9b ("net: drop rtnl_lock for queue_mgmt operations")
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
---
v2:
- rebase on a70f891e0fa0 ("net: devmem: do not WARN conditionally after netdev_rx_queue_restart()")
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/20250312223507.805719-2-kuba@kernel.org
---
net/core/devmem.c | 2 --
net/core/netdev-genl.c | 2 ++
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/devmem.c b/net/core/devmem.c
index 6802e82a4d03..ee145a2aa41c 100644
--- a/net/core/devmem.c
+++ b/net/core/devmem.c
@@ -128,12 +128,10 @@ void net_devmem_unbind_dmabuf(struct net_devmem_dmabuf_binding *binding)
rxq->mp_params.mp_priv = NULL;
rxq->mp_params.mp_ops = NULL;
- netdev_lock(binding->dev);
rxq_idx = get_netdev_rx_queue_index(rxq);
err = netdev_rx_queue_restart(binding->dev, rxq_idx);
WARN_ON(err && err != -ENETDOWN);
- netdev_unlock(binding->dev);
}
xa_erase(&net_devmem_dmabuf_bindings, binding->id);
diff --git a/net/core/netdev-genl.c b/net/core/netdev-genl.c
index a186fea63c09..9e4882a22407 100644
--- a/net/core/netdev-genl.c
+++ b/net/core/netdev-genl.c
@@ -947,7 +947,9 @@ void netdev_nl_sock_priv_destroy(struct netdev_nl_sock *priv)
mutex_lock(&priv->lock);
list_for_each_entry_safe(binding, temp, &priv->bindings, list) {
+ netdev_lock(binding->dev);
net_devmem_unbind_dmabuf(binding);
+ netdev_unlock(binding->dev);
}
mutex_unlock(&priv->lock);
}
--
2.49.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-24 22:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-24 22:45 [PATCH net-next v2 00/11] net: skip taking rtnl_lock for queue GET Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-03-25 5:19 ` [PATCH net-next v2 01/11] net: bubble up taking netdev instance lock to callers of net_devmem_unbind_dmabuf() Mina Almasry
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 02/11] net: remove netif_set_real_num_rx_queues() helper for when SYSFS=n Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 03/11] net: constify dev pointer in misc instance lock helpers Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 04/11] net: explain "protection types" for the instance lock Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 05/11] net: designate queue counts as "double ops protected" by " Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 06/11] net: designate queue -> napi linking as "ops protected" Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 07/11] net: protect rxq->mp_params with the instance lock Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-25 5:34 ` Mina Almasry
2025-03-25 9:50 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 08/11] net: make NETDEV_UNREGISTER and instance lock more consistent Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-25 12:17 ` Cosmin Ratiu
2025-03-25 17:04 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 09/11] net: designate XSK pool pointers in queues as "ops protected" Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 10/11] netdev: add "ops compat locking" helpers Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 11/11] netdev: don't hold rtnl_lock over nl queue info get when possible Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-25 4:04 ` [PATCH net-next v2 00/11] net: skip taking rtnl_lock for queue GET Stanislav Fomichev
2025-03-25 17:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250324224537.248800-2-kuba@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).