From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 08/11] net: make NETDEV_UNREGISTER and instance lock more consistent
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 15:45:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250324224537.248800-9-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250324224537.248800-1-kuba@kernel.org>
The NETDEV_UNREGISTER notifier gets called under the ops lock
when device changes namespace but not during real unregistration.
Take it consistently, XSK tries to poke at netdev queue state
from this notifier.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
---
net/core/dev.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 652f2c6f5674..7bd8bd82f66f 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -1848,7 +1848,9 @@ static void call_netdevice_unregister_notifiers(struct notifier_block *nb,
dev);
call_netdevice_notifier(nb, NETDEV_DOWN, dev);
}
+ netdev_lock_ops(dev);
call_netdevice_notifier(nb, NETDEV_UNREGISTER, dev);
+ netdev_unlock_ops(dev);
}
static int call_netdevice_register_net_notifiers(struct notifier_block *nb,
@@ -11174,8 +11176,11 @@ static struct net_device *netdev_wait_allrefs_any(struct list_head *list)
rtnl_lock();
/* Rebroadcast unregister notification */
- list_for_each_entry(dev, list, todo_list)
+ list_for_each_entry(dev, list, todo_list) {
+ netdev_lock_ops(dev);
call_netdevice_notifiers(NETDEV_UNREGISTER, dev);
+ netdev_unlock_ops(dev);
+ }
__rtnl_unlock();
rcu_barrier();
@@ -11966,7 +11971,9 @@ void unregister_netdevice_many_notify(struct list_head *head,
/* Notify protocols, that we are about to destroy
* this device. They should clean all the things.
*/
+ netdev_lock_ops(dev);
call_netdevice_notifiers(NETDEV_UNREGISTER, dev);
+ netdev_unlock_ops(dev);
if (!dev->rtnl_link_ops ||
dev->rtnl_link_state == RTNL_LINK_INITIALIZED)
--
2.49.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-24 22:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-24 22:45 [PATCH net-next v2 00/11] net: skip taking rtnl_lock for queue GET Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 01/11] net: bubble up taking netdev instance lock to callers of net_devmem_unbind_dmabuf() Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-25 5:19 ` Mina Almasry
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 02/11] net: remove netif_set_real_num_rx_queues() helper for when SYSFS=n Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 03/11] net: constify dev pointer in misc instance lock helpers Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 04/11] net: explain "protection types" for the instance lock Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 05/11] net: designate queue counts as "double ops protected" by " Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 06/11] net: designate queue -> napi linking as "ops protected" Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 07/11] net: protect rxq->mp_params with the instance lock Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-25 5:34 ` Mina Almasry
2025-03-25 9:50 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-03-25 12:17 ` [PATCH net-next v2 08/11] net: make NETDEV_UNREGISTER and instance lock more consistent Cosmin Ratiu
2025-03-25 17:04 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 09/11] net: designate XSK pool pointers in queues as "ops protected" Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 10/11] netdev: add "ops compat locking" helpers Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 11/11] netdev: don't hold rtnl_lock over nl queue info get when possible Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-25 4:04 ` [PATCH net-next v2 00/11] net: skip taking rtnl_lock for queue GET Stanislav Fomichev
2025-03-25 17:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250324224537.248800-9-kuba@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).