From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Milena Olech <milena.olech@intel.com>,
przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com, karol.kolacinski@intel.com,
richardcochran@gmail.com, Josh Hay <joshua.a.hay@intel.com>,
Samuel Salin <Samuel.salin@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 08/10] idpf: add Tx timestamp flows
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 06:00:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250325060030.279c99bf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250318161327.2532891-9-anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 09:13:23 -0700 Tony Nguyen wrote:
> +/**
> + * struct idpf_tx_tstamp_stats - Tx timestamp statistics
> + * @tx_hwtstamp_lock: Lock to protect Tx tstamp stats
> + * @tx_hwtstamp_discarded: Number of Tx skbs discarded due to cached PHC time
> + * being too old to correctly extend timestamp
> + * @tx_hwtstamp_flushed: Number of Tx skbs flushed due to interface closed
> + */
> +struct idpf_tx_tstamp_stats {
> + struct mutex tx_hwtstamp_lock;
> + u32 tx_hwtstamp_discarded;
> + u32 tx_hwtstamp_flushed;
> +};
> * idpf_get_rxnfc - command to get RX flow classification rules
> @@ -479,6 +480,9 @@ static const struct idpf_stats idpf_gstrings_port_stats[] = {
> IDPF_PORT_STAT("tx-unicast_pkts", port_stats.vport_stats.tx_unicast),
> IDPF_PORT_STAT("tx-multicast_pkts", port_stats.vport_stats.tx_multicast),
> IDPF_PORT_STAT("tx-broadcast_pkts", port_stats.vport_stats.tx_broadcast),
> + IDPF_PORT_STAT("tx-hwtstamp_skipped", port_stats.tx_hwtstamp_skipped),
> + IDPF_PORT_STAT("tx-hwtstamp_flushed", tstamp_stats.tx_hwtstamp_flushed),
> + IDPF_PORT_STAT("tx-hwtstamp_discarded", tstamp_stats.tx_hwtstamp_discarded),
I don't see you implementing .get_ts_stats ? If there is a reason
please explain in the commit msg. We require that standard stats
are reported if you want to report custom, more granular ones.
> +static int idpf_get_ts_info(struct net_device *netdev,
> + struct kernel_ethtool_ts_info *info)
> +{
> + struct idpf_netdev_priv *np = netdev_priv(netdev);
> + struct idpf_vport *vport;
> + int err = 0;
> +
> + if (!mutex_trylock(&np->adapter->vport_ctrl_lock))
Why trylock? This also needs a solid and well documented justification
to pass.
--
pw-bot: cr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-25 13:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-18 16:13 [PATCH net-next 00/10][pull request] idpf: add initial PTP support Tony Nguyen
2025-03-18 16:13 ` [PATCH net-next 01/10] " Tony Nguyen
2025-03-25 12:44 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-25 21:05 ` Jacob Keller
2025-04-02 13:16 ` Olech, Milena
2025-03-18 16:13 ` [PATCH net-next 02/10] virtchnl: add PTP virtchnl definitions Tony Nguyen
2025-03-18 16:13 ` [PATCH net-next 03/10] idpf: move virtchnl structures to the header file Tony Nguyen
2025-03-18 16:13 ` [PATCH net-next 04/10] idpf: negotiate PTP capabilities and get PTP clock Tony Nguyen
2025-03-25 12:49 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-25 21:07 ` Jacob Keller
2025-03-26 8:24 ` Przemek Kitszel
2025-04-02 15:23 ` Olech, Milena
2025-04-02 16:37 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-18 16:13 ` [PATCH net-next 05/10] idpf: add mailbox access to read PTP clock time Tony Nguyen
2025-03-18 16:13 ` [PATCH net-next 06/10] idpf: add PTP clock configuration Tony Nguyen
2025-03-18 16:13 ` [PATCH net-next 07/10] idpf: add Tx timestamp capabilities negotiation Tony Nguyen
2025-03-18 16:13 ` [PATCH net-next 08/10] idpf: add Tx timestamp flows Tony Nguyen
2025-03-25 13:00 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-03-25 21:10 ` Jacob Keller
2025-04-02 14:57 ` Olech, Milena
2025-03-18 16:13 ` [PATCH net-next 09/10] idpf: add support for Rx timestamping Tony Nguyen
2025-03-18 16:13 ` [PATCH net-next 10/10] idpf: change the method for mailbox workqueue allocation Tony Nguyen
2025-03-25 21:08 ` Jacob Keller
2025-04-02 13:22 ` Olech, Milena
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250325060030.279c99bf@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=Samuel.salin@intel.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=joshua.a.hay@intel.com \
--cc=karol.kolacinski@intel.com \
--cc=milena.olech@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).