netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@nvidia.com>
Cc: "davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"sdf@fomichev.me" <sdf@fomichev.me>,
	"horms@kernel.org" <horms@kernel.org>,
	"edumazet@google.com" <edumazet@google.com>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"andrew+netdev@lunn.ch" <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"pabeni@redhat.com" <pabeni@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 08/11] net: make NETDEV_UNREGISTER and instance lock more consistent
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 10:04:12 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250325100412.73b49ded@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0be167ba394a9485c78c67d187ec546131a5cbe1.camel@nvidia.com>

On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 12:17:15 +0000 Cosmin Ratiu wrote:
> > +	netdev_lock_ops(dev);
> >  	call_netdevice_notifier(nb, NETDEV_UNREGISTER, dev);
> > +	netdev_unlock_ops(dev);
> >  }  
> 
> This introduces a potential deadlock when changing a device namespace:
> do_setlink already locks the instance lock and
> call_netdevice_unregister_notifiers will then deadlock.

Thanks for catching, the notifiers need a closer look.
Let me apply the earlier patches (most importantly the fix)
and we'll see what shakes out as we address the outstanding
bugs in notifiers..

  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-25 17:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-24 22:45 [PATCH net-next v2 00/11] net: skip taking rtnl_lock for queue GET Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 01/11] net: bubble up taking netdev instance lock to callers of net_devmem_unbind_dmabuf() Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-25  5:19   ` Mina Almasry
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 02/11] net: remove netif_set_real_num_rx_queues() helper for when SYSFS=n Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 03/11] net: constify dev pointer in misc instance lock helpers Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 04/11] net: explain "protection types" for the instance lock Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 05/11] net: designate queue counts as "double ops protected" by " Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 06/11] net: designate queue -> napi linking as "ops protected" Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 07/11] net: protect rxq->mp_params with the instance lock Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-25  5:34   ` Mina Almasry
2025-03-25  9:50     ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 08/11] net: make NETDEV_UNREGISTER and instance lock more consistent Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-25 12:17   ` Cosmin Ratiu
2025-03-25 17:04     ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 09/11] net: designate XSK pool pointers in queues as "ops protected" Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 10/11] netdev: add "ops compat locking" helpers Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 11/11] netdev: don't hold rtnl_lock over nl queue info get when possible Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-25  4:04 ` [PATCH net-next v2 00/11] net: skip taking rtnl_lock for queue GET Stanislav Fomichev
2025-03-25 17:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250325100412.73b49ded@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=cratiu@nvidia.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).