From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 620821A0712 for ; Tue, 25 Mar 2025 17:04:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742922260; cv=none; b=qasEF84V0KlVdI8ZWgcU/zMTdl3Fg0OQZ/xqzppAIiJ/3Mn2Q2X9K/srhkkY02QBLgnfmnwHZkadduUv36LEs9Ku8sGm4Fw1rWutviFs7Y5N0cuUbGXX5XOSzi007zqZOk0v7H8VSuMxPiIDXqDUTULg3F/oxFuktOR3JkdLhQI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742922260; c=relaxed/simple; bh=rtuiFQwbX8f3mWULtdpBdIoW+29mipyFqmH/njLvTkw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=iqLPWh4Nqh/NP+JUO5fOqg4910dXzNgIA0L/Be+u8VtyLCxTmBrsd94KoOYlh1qlt460R5swtnJ3Zpo3Mds2BcoWbPXjvWCxd0h3fHG7lgv99oHw8scwjk4SBhJ2CYOjD1j9RLejwFAT2D3sc6oVOl9Zt2gpRbftI0dQ3VSquJg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=gqgp0GAc; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="gqgp0GAc" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CB32BC4CEE4; Tue, 25 Mar 2025 17:04:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1742922259; bh=rtuiFQwbX8f3mWULtdpBdIoW+29mipyFqmH/njLvTkw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=gqgp0GAcNKdFxZ6WpeyonBsBMQOnZR1mzn5C3Dh1wJiwJqlUG4X+KCI3brMOlDknp c5tGMsAjGCLMlm5/YJ/f6PJEM1HU6D+Y4t6FET746Xb2dkZ0zr9SsCsG3NwQOiTIQd HKgYclZF7W1GrGe8lpYqvXvgpSgIV7o2jkirfCrBR6gMo0HSrzZsvSBc6LexasFyfA cTG+fjhKqflQl2I1yhvpH6JyrmLCuWciiynuEKTeRmqbhjbPyNYF9x0n7Xf2OPQvOT kWOIZ39v/Jgz9GwB4J+rHvm7wpY49R1Vv7A2WPNZHMMYrZPsqnceo5r85FqZVODzbK lFcDtbWYC8nxA== Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 10:04:12 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Cosmin Ratiu Cc: "davem@davemloft.net" , "sdf@fomichev.me" , "horms@kernel.org" , "edumazet@google.com" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "andrew+netdev@lunn.ch" , "pabeni@redhat.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 08/11] net: make NETDEV_UNREGISTER and instance lock more consistent Message-ID: <20250325100412.73b49ded@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <0be167ba394a9485c78c67d187ec546131a5cbe1.camel@nvidia.com> References: <20250324224537.248800-1-kuba@kernel.org> <20250324224537.248800-9-kuba@kernel.org> <0be167ba394a9485c78c67d187ec546131a5cbe1.camel@nvidia.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 12:17:15 +0000 Cosmin Ratiu wrote: > > + netdev_lock_ops(dev); > > =C2=A0 call_netdevice_notifier(nb, NETDEV_UNREGISTER, dev); > > + netdev_unlock_ops(dev); > > =C2=A0} =20 >=20 > This introduces a potential deadlock when changing a device namespace: > do_setlink already locks the instance lock and > call_netdevice_unregister_notifiers will then deadlock. Thanks for catching, the notifiers need a closer look. Let me apply the earlier patches (most importantly the fix) and we'll see what shakes out as we address the outstanding bugs in notifiers..