From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F27F21DB933; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 11:26:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742988417; cv=none; b=r/H+Ee2Hk0ZOqSO2P66CFlExy5yd/mTlQ3sw7eRawEAcZNqIfe0srdssVR7BpiLxhuhqaNXqqMsuKwGSQer7+39YT/fTJsWE+w6z5M6sPGpGngg0gEURFRc/vQMOEekbx5y1Xp8Dx30HY4O4xhou4fFgbp5HSUZE8xQxFDViof4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742988417; c=relaxed/simple; bh=B0tO8CnDZPZrFA4sBgQRkOGBZgqifgPJ7rFS0OAnDy0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=LhV7FvwDP04Ig5lxBn1lfacRP4LcknSnyPrzuIyOp4DegIaIPA5wgFRtg9O5JFDIBiMaWQv/gESb3m9ZVLQbVpq5Wpbz+nhZOEVfHvq9x3QOjzu2KFz+rb6CIZFIhti0TB0XEi/PUC6XiaAx8SAodK4brHCyOtWQnR6MO9FqFa0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=bSUE6sXC; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="bSUE6sXC" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2987DC4CEEA; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 11:26:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1742988416; bh=B0tO8CnDZPZrFA4sBgQRkOGBZgqifgPJ7rFS0OAnDy0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=bSUE6sXC1KNdeZDssxyZ0t01qYtSaEslX1Mn8TG3KqHZLdWAGdjEPK1Nfcez4ITWc ofIAWnnGAUyIaXvM+swSexz4rHgqnafGiZ0SW6Si7D0DFAcBoq0G7JQtddekBM1lzr gbknQZU61VE2IOIhiHswZVHkr7NtKQBtfBOb8QPIn5MyW4IqERQ3YKZwaettUoXQi8 icHOdzRnQ/un2M5YERUL9Alot8fCgMUBzNm+tmbyGfamvZgbdTXYcp0ySNksEsyMSb xwMAao8OSGOohZxVBu3PrZTwLddi0cds2uX03Ek6lHw76H9q/1FpwGGz3D/tKf/cfX pWI5ws7LRuVug== Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 04:26:55 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Stephen Rothwell , Kuniyuki Iwashima Cc: John Johansen , David Miller , Paolo Abeni , Networking , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the apparmor tree Message-ID: <20250326042655.4e160022@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20250326150148.72d9138d@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20250326150148.72d9138d@canb.auug.org.au> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 15:01:48 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > After merging the apparmor tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > security/apparmor/af_unix.c: In function 'unix_state_double_lock': > security/apparmor/af_unix.c:627:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'unix_state_lock'; did you mean 'unix_state_double_lock'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > 627 | unix_state_lock(sk1); > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > | unix_state_double_lock > security/apparmor/af_unix.c: In function 'unix_state_double_unlock': > security/apparmor/af_unix.c:642:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'unix_state_unlock'; did you mean 'unix_state_double_lock'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > 642 | unix_state_unlock(sk1); > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > | unix_state_double_lock Thanks Stephen! I'll pop this into the tree in a few hours, just giving Kuniyuki a bit more time to ack.