From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67463F9FE for ; Thu, 27 Mar 2025 17:08:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1743095335; cv=none; b=brEokt2CzaTlf/jd03TgvXtoIEl7isU/ernlsVaLZ7ZkskTdiVuPlpVe8F5st6zUq3L7XofKNtM9FDNEZselqL6w2NF8AzFgW2MApXCvstvKai7qUnSrajDZ7nbPmaShss72slS6b9WVjxhdx3/3zoZxVHNIGvps8A/dHIGekNQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1743095335; c=relaxed/simple; bh=liOfZ/kDgmZDCaBiAWZo8Gm23d4TFhcnRESDbheLmeo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ZdljEVz4POm7mYFTt7v446oVJbg2jp6pIltB0Rd93RDDDtnVkhfBtyD52f4c7MHUDldwNQqg7TxpjHk87WgEbtgM38aPri5K7DBDMX6YpiifMV7rCxCDy4Ao4T0GV3Z6Ci0qEq1xA23PoKgEI95ZRuFd9hIU5UixnnFQrhZVXOw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Ce4DHQuN; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Ce4DHQuN" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 541F8C4CEDD; Thu, 27 Mar 2025 17:08:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1743095334; bh=liOfZ/kDgmZDCaBiAWZo8Gm23d4TFhcnRESDbheLmeo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Ce4DHQuN1LPZLaSxJR+pbdvcwKrc+QolG8cAE25Mc5LkPcIxeGxZWKovBiNh0JwGd RyeenkCeoLntZfz8cVpr574Jp4W9bje/Q+wAtQ4YlmlmDjlMgx+8XNiBCVzL22ym9W hAGzMlq7FhqdXIMTrCrstinpD8JW9vOfODksRIEMFZEoDWRJ0wdWlzEYUu6whjjQjo RG2tTlzs/XUiQc9t3HezY7W+X6Ux1lqwDnTL+1dJb0NxYoNIyyLY9Bwd3HuEpGRt5L 77b/tL0bASDLTASN/jozE9QwKE6XYMhn6tB6bkaT4PAWTYUVD43lMIa48w8dekzSP8 B+FF1MVZs8x9A== Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 10:08:53 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Stanislav Fomichev Cc: Maciej Fijalkowski , Samiullah Khawaja , "David S . Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , almasrymina@google.com, willemb@google.com, jdamato@fastly.com, mkarsten@uwaterloo.ca, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next] Add xsk_rr an AF_XDP benchmark to measure latency Message-ID: <20250327100853.14bfce4f@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20250320163523.3501305-1-skhawaja@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 15:32:32 -0700 Stanislav Fomichev wrote: > > As you said it's benchmarking tool so I feel like it should land in > > https://github.com/xdp-project/bpf-examples where we have xdpsock that > > have been previously used for benchmarks. > > I don't think it matters where the tools live. I'm more interested in > the general guidance on whether we want to continuously run those tools > on NIPA (on real HW) and track the numbers. Unfortunately it's gonna put > extra load on the maintainers in terms of tracking and acting on failures, > but it feels like it's a good direction in general. I think we should try. Mina is working on merging the page pool test AFAIU, this is even easier cause it's just user space, no magic modules to load.