netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Tariq Toukan <ttoukan.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	Gal Pressman <gal@nvidia.com>,
	Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>,
	Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
	Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Moshe Shemesh <moshe@nvidia.com>,
	Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>, Lama Kayal <lkayal@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net/mlx5e: SHAMPO, Make reserved size independent of page size
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 10:46:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250331094620.GA185681@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ea6a499b-c267-4fa3-8ed6-983ab96b3b9e@gmail.com>

On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 07:58:30PM +0200, Tariq Toukan wrote:
> 
> 
> On 25/03/2025 16:04, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 23, 2025 at 02:28:26PM +0200, Tariq Toukan wrote:
> > > From: Lama Kayal <lkayal@nvidia.com>
> > > 
> > > When hw-gro is enabled, the maximum number of header entries that are
> > > needed per wqe (hd_per_wqe) is calculated based on the size of the
> > > reservations among other parameters.
> > > 
> > > Miscalculation of the size of reservations leads to incorrect
> > > calculation of hd_per_wqe as 0, particularly in the case of large page
> > > size like in aarch64, this prevents the SHAMPO header from being
> > > correctly initialized in the device, ultimately causing the following
> > > cqe err that indicates a violation of PD.
> > 
> > Hi Lama, Tariq, all,
> > 
> > If I understand things correctly, hd_per_wqe is calculated
> > in mlx5e_shampo_hd_per_wqe() like this:
> > 
> > u32 mlx5e_shampo_hd_per_wqe(struct mlx5_core_dev *mdev,
> >                              struct mlx5e_params *params,                                                    struct mlx5e_rq_param *rq_param)
> > {
> >          int resv_size = BIT(mlx5e_shampo_get_log_rsrv_size(mdev, params)) * PAGE_SIZE;
> >          u16 num_strides = BIT(mlx5e_mpwqe_get_log_num_strides(mdev, params, NULL));
> >          int pkt_per_resv = BIT(mlx5e_shampo_get_log_pkt_per_rsrv(mdev, params));
> >          u8 log_stride_sz = mlx5e_mpwqe_get_log_stride_size(mdev, params, NULL);
> >          int wqe_size = BIT(log_stride_sz) * num_strides;                                u32 hd_per_wqe;
> > 
> >          /* Assumption: hd_per_wqe % 8 == 0. */
> >          hd_per_wqe = (wqe_size / resv_size) * pkt_per_resv;                             mlx5_core_dbg(mdev, "%s hd_per_wqe = %d rsrv_size = %d wqe_size = %d pkt_per_resv = %d\n",                                                                                    __func__, hd_per_wqe, resv_size, wqe_size, pkt_per_resv);
> >          return hd_per_wqe;
> > }
> > 
> > I can see that if PAGE_SIZE was some multiple of 4k, and thus
> > larger than wqe_size, then this could lead to hd_per_wqe being zero.
> > 
> > But I note that mlx5e_mpwqe_get_log_stride_size() may return PAGE_SHIFT.
> > And I wonder if that leads to wqe_size being larger than expected by this
> > patch in cases where the PAGE_SIZE is greater than 4k.
> > 
> > Likewise in mlx5e_shampo_get_log_cq_size(), which seems to have a large overlap
> > codewise with mlx5e_shampo_hd_per_wqe().
> > 
> > > 
> 
> Hi Simon,
> 
> Different settings lead to different combinations of num_strides and
> stride_size. However, they affect each other in a way that the resulting
> wqe_size has the expected (~preset) value.
> 
> In mlx5e_mpwqe_get_log_num_strides() you can see that if stride_size grows,
> then num_strides decreases accordingly.
> 
> In addition, to reduce mistakes/bugs, we have a few WARNs() along the
> calculations, in addition to a verifier function
> mlx5e_verify_rx_mpwqe_strides().

Hi Tariq,

Sorry for the slow response, I was AFK for a few days.

Thanks for confirming that this is as expected.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-31  9:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-23 12:28 [PATCH net] net/mlx5e: SHAMPO, Make reserved size independent of page size Tariq Toukan
2025-03-25 14:04 ` Simon Horman
2025-03-27 17:58   ` Tariq Toukan
2025-03-31  9:46     ` Simon Horman [this message]
2025-03-28 13:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250331094620.GA185681@horms.kernel.org \
    --to=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=gal@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=leonro@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkayal@nvidia.com \
    --cc=mbloch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=moshe@nvidia.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
    --cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
    --cc=ttoukan.linux@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).