netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Cc: Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@gmail.com>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>,
	kuniyu@amazon.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
	edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, michael.chan@broadcom.com,
	pavan.chebbi@broadcom.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,
	Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bnxt_en: bring back rtnl lock in bnxt_shutdown
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 10:16:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250331101636.58590e38@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z+rIfMYoinNfz820@gmail.com>

On Mon, 31 Mar 2025 09:53:16 -0700 Breno Leitao wrote:
> > But also in general, it would be nice to keep existing
> > rtnl+instance_lock scheme for now (except were we want to explicitly opt
> > out, as in queue apis); we can follow up later to un-rtnl the rest.  
> 
> I am just wondering if the code as-is is already safe from a locking
> perspecting, and just the warning (ASSERT_RTNL) is wrong.

I suspect the notifiers for DOWN may expect to be called with rtnl held.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-31 17:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-28 17:42 [PATCH net] bnxt_en: bring back rtnl lock in bnxt_shutdown Stanislav Fomichev
2025-03-29 10:25 ` Taehee Yoo
2025-03-31 11:45 ` Breno Leitao
2025-03-31 15:29   ` Stanislav Fomichev
2025-03-31 16:53     ` Breno Leitao
2025-03-31 17:16       ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-04-01  0:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250331101636.58590e38@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=ap420073@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuniyu@amazon.com \
    --cc=leitao@debian.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michael.chan@broadcom.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=pavan.chebbi@broadcom.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=stfomichev@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).