From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Subbaraya Sundeep <sbhatta@marvell.com>
Cc: Wentao Liang <vulab@iscas.ac.cn>,
Sunil Kovvuri Goutham <sgoutham@marvell.com>,
Geethasowjanya Akula <gakula@marvell.com>,
Hariprasad Kelam <hkelam@marvell.com>,
"andrew+netdev@lunn.ch" <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"edumazet@google.com" <edumazet@google.com>,
"kuba@kernel.org" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"pabeni@redhat.com" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] octeontx2-pf: Add error handling for cn10k_map_unmap_rq_policer().
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 16:03:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250407150358.GN395307@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z_NpOu08haGEgqi6@452e0070d9ab>
On Mon, Apr 07, 2025 at 05:57:14AM +0000, Subbaraya Sundeep wrote:
> On 2025-04-04 at 11:11:38, Simon Horman (horms@kernel.org) wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 04, 2025 at 05:22:16AM +0000, Subbaraya Sundeep Bhatta wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > From: Wentao Liang <vulab@iscas.ac.cn>
> > > Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2025 8:43 PM
> > > To: Sunil Kovvuri Goutham <sgoutham@marvell.com>; Geethasowjanya Akula <gakula@marvell.com>; Subbaraya Sundeep Bhatta <sbhatta@marvell.com>; Hariprasad Kelam <hkelam@marvell.com>; andrew+netdev@lunn.ch; davem@davemloft.net; edumazet@google.com; kuba@kernel.org; pabeni@redhat.com
> > > Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Wentao Liang <vulab@iscas.ac.cn>
> > > Subject: [PATCH] octeontx2-pf: Add error handling for cn10k_map_unmap_rq_policer().
> > >
> > > The cn10k_free_matchall_ipolicer() calls the cn10k_map_unmap_rq_policer()
> > > for each queue in a for loop without checking for any errors. A proper
> > > implementation can be found in cn10k_set_matchall_ipolicer_rate().
> > >
> > > Check the return value of the cn10k_map_unmap_rq_policer() function during
> > > each loop. Jump to unlock function and return the error code if the
> > > funciton fails to unmap policer.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 2ca89a2c3752 ("octeontx2-pf: TC_MATCHALL ingress ratelimiting offload")
> > > Signed-off-by: Wentao Liang <mailto:vulab@iscas.ac.cn>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/cn10k.c | 6 ++++--
> > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/cn10k.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/cn10k.c
> > > index a15cc86635d6..ce58ad61198e 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/cn10k.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/cn10k.c
> > > @@ -353,11 +353,13 @@ int cn10k_free_matchall_ipolicer(struct otx2_nic *pfvf)
> > >
> > > /* Remove RQ's policer mapping */
> > > for (qidx = 0; qidx < hw->rx_queues; qidx++)
> > > - cn10k_map_unmap_rq_policer(pfvf, qidx,
> > > - hw->matchall_ipolicer, false);
> > > + rc = cn10k_map_unmap_rq_policer(pfvf, qidx, hw->matchall_ipolicer, false);
> > > + if (rc)
> > > + goto out;
> > >
> > > Intentionally we do not bail out when unmapping one of the queues is failed. The reason is during teardown if one of the queues is failed then
> > > we end up not tearing down rest of the queues and those queues cannot be used later which is bad. So leave whatever queues have failed and proceed
> > > with tearing down the rest. Hence all we can do is print an error for the failed queue and continue.
> >
> > Hi Sundeep,
> >
> > Sorry that I didn't notice your response before sending my own to Wentao.
> >
> > I do agree that bailing out here is not a good idea. But I wonder if there
> > is any value in the function should propagate some error reporting if any
> > call to cn10k_map_unmap_rq_policer fails - e.g. the first failure - while
> > still iterating aver all elements.
> >
> > Just an idea.
> >
> Hi Simon,
>
> We can do but it gets compilcated if more than one queue failed and
> reasons are different. Hence just print error and continue.
Yes, understood. I did think about this some more and I think that
reporting an error is the best we can do, else as you say it gets complex.
So if there is already a log made, then I think that is sufficient.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-07 15:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-07 5:57 [PATCH] octeontx2-pf: Add error handling for cn10k_map_unmap_rq_policer() Subbaraya Sundeep
2025-04-07 15:03 ` Simon Horman [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-04-03 15:13 Wentao Liang
2025-04-04 5:07 ` Michal Swiatkowski
2025-04-04 5:22 ` Subbaraya Sundeep Bhatta
2025-04-04 11:11 ` Simon Horman
2025-04-04 11:06 ` Simon Horman
2025-04-04 17:35 ` kernel test robot
2025-04-04 17:46 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250407150358.GN395307@horms.kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gakula@marvell.com \
--cc=hkelam@marvell.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sbhatta@marvell.com \
--cc=sgoutham@marvell.com \
--cc=vulab@iscas.ac.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).