netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
	andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me,
	hramamurthy@google.com, kuniyu@amazon.com, jdamato@fastly.com
Subject: [PATCH net-next 3/8] netdev: add "ops compat locking" helpers
Date: Mon,  7 Apr 2025 12:01:12 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250407190117.16528-4-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250407190117.16528-1-kuba@kernel.org>

Add helpers to "lock a netdev in a backward-compatible way",
which for ops-locked netdevs will mean take the instance lock.
For drivers which haven't opted into the ops locking we'll take
rtnl_lock.

The scoped foreach is dropping and re-taking the lock for each
device, even if prev and next are both under rtnl_lock.
I hope that's fine since we expect that netdev nl to be mostly
supported by modern drivers, and modern drivers should also
opt into the instance locking.

Note that these helpers are mostly needed for queue related state,
because drivers modify queue config in their ops in a non-atomic
way. Or differently put, queue changes don't have a clear-cut API
like NAPI configuration. Any state that can should just use the
instance lock directly, not the "compat" hacks.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
---
 include/net/netdev_lock.h | 16 ++++++++++++
 net/core/dev.h            | 15 ++++++++++++
 net/core/dev.c            | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 82 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/net/netdev_lock.h b/include/net/netdev_lock.h
index c316b551df8d..5706835a660c 100644
--- a/include/net/netdev_lock.h
+++ b/include/net/netdev_lock.h
@@ -64,6 +64,22 @@ netdev_ops_assert_locked_or_invisible(const struct net_device *dev)
 		netdev_ops_assert_locked(dev);
 }
 
+static inline void netdev_lock_ops_compat(struct net_device *dev)
+{
+	if (netdev_need_ops_lock(dev))
+		netdev_lock(dev);
+	else
+		rtnl_lock();
+}
+
+static inline void netdev_unlock_ops_compat(struct net_device *dev)
+{
+	if (netdev_need_ops_lock(dev))
+		netdev_unlock(dev);
+	else
+		rtnl_unlock();
+}
+
 static inline int netdev_lock_cmp_fn(const struct lockdep_map *a,
 				     const struct lockdep_map *b)
 {
diff --git a/net/core/dev.h b/net/core/dev.h
index 3cc2d8787c83..3fd7847d6d60 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.h
+++ b/net/core/dev.h
@@ -41,6 +41,21 @@ DEFINE_FREE(netdev_unlock, struct net_device *, if (_T) netdev_unlock(_T));
 	     (var_name = netdev_xa_find_lock(net, var_name, &ifindex)); \
 	     ifindex++)
 
+struct net_device *
+netdev_get_by_index_lock_ops_compat(struct net *net, int ifindex);
+struct net_device *
+netdev_xa_find_lock_ops_compat(struct net *net, struct net_device *dev,
+			       unsigned long *index);
+
+DEFINE_FREE(netdev_unlock_ops_compat, struct net_device *,
+	    if (_T) netdev_unlock_ops_compat(_T));
+
+#define for_each_netdev_lock_ops_compat_scoped(net, var_name, ifindex)	\
+	for (struct net_device *var_name __free(netdev_unlock_ops_compat) = NULL; \
+	     (var_name = netdev_xa_find_lock_ops_compat(net, var_name,	\
+							&ifindex));	\
+	     ifindex++)
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
 int __init dev_proc_init(void);
 #else
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 7060c3171cd8..baf615e0ae27 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -1052,6 +1052,20 @@ struct net_device *__netdev_put_lock(struct net_device *dev, struct net *net)
 	return dev;
 }
 
+static struct net_device *
+__netdev_put_lock_ops_compat(struct net_device *dev, struct net *net)
+{
+	netdev_lock_ops_compat(dev);
+	if (dev->reg_state > NETREG_REGISTERED ||
+	    dev->moving_ns || !net_eq(dev_net(dev), net)) {
+		netdev_unlock_ops_compat(dev);
+		dev_put(dev);
+		return NULL;
+	}
+	dev_put(dev);
+	return dev;
+}
+
 /**
  *	netdev_get_by_index_lock() - find a device by its ifindex
  *	@net: the applicable net namespace
@@ -1074,6 +1088,18 @@ struct net_device *netdev_get_by_index_lock(struct net *net, int ifindex)
 	return __netdev_put_lock(dev, net);
 }
 
+struct net_device *
+netdev_get_by_index_lock_ops_compat(struct net *net, int ifindex)
+{
+	struct net_device *dev;
+
+	dev = dev_get_by_index(net, ifindex);
+	if (!dev)
+		return NULL;
+
+	return __netdev_put_lock_ops_compat(dev, net);
+}
+
 struct net_device *
 netdev_xa_find_lock(struct net *net, struct net_device *dev,
 		    unsigned long *index)
@@ -1099,6 +1125,31 @@ netdev_xa_find_lock(struct net *net, struct net_device *dev,
 	} while (true);
 }
 
+struct net_device *
+netdev_xa_find_lock_ops_compat(struct net *net, struct net_device *dev,
+			       unsigned long *index)
+{
+	if (dev)
+		netdev_unlock_ops_compat(dev);
+
+	do {
+		rcu_read_lock();
+		dev = xa_find(&net->dev_by_index, index, ULONG_MAX, XA_PRESENT);
+		if (!dev) {
+			rcu_read_unlock();
+			return NULL;
+		}
+		dev_hold(dev);
+		rcu_read_unlock();
+
+		dev = __netdev_put_lock_ops_compat(dev, net);
+		if (dev)
+			return dev;
+
+		(*index)++;
+	} while (true);
+}
+
 static DEFINE_SEQLOCK(netdev_rename_lock);
 
 void netdev_copy_name(struct net_device *dev, char *name)
-- 
2.49.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-04-07 19:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-07 19:01 [PATCH net-next 0/8] net: depend on instance lock for queue related netlink ops Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-07 19:01 ` [PATCH net-next 1/8] net: avoid potential race between netdev_get_by_index_lock() and netns switch Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-08  2:40   ` Joe Damato
2025-04-07 19:01 ` [PATCH net-next 2/8] net: designate XSK pool pointers in queues as "ops protected" Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-08  2:17   ` Joe Damato
2025-04-08 14:59     ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-07 19:01 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-04-08  2:41   ` [PATCH net-next 3/8] netdev: add "ops compat locking" helpers Joe Damato
2025-04-07 19:01 ` [PATCH net-next 4/8] netdev: don't hold rtnl_lock over nl queue info get when possible Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-08  2:28   ` Joe Damato
2025-04-07 19:01 ` [PATCH net-next 5/8] xdp: double protect netdev->xdp_flags with netdev->lock Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-08  2:30   ` Joe Damato
2025-04-07 19:01 ` [PATCH net-next 6/8] netdev: depend on netdev->lock for xdp features Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-08  2:31   ` Joe Damato
2025-04-07 19:01 ` [PATCH net-next 7/8] docs: netdev: break down the instance locking info per ops struct Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-08  2:34   ` Joe Damato
2025-04-08 15:08     ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-07 19:01 ` [PATCH net-next 8/8] netdev: depend on netdev->lock for qstats in ops locked drivers Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-08  2:37   ` Joe Damato
2025-04-08  0:28 ` [PATCH net-next 0/8] net: depend on instance lock for queue related netlink ops Stanislav Fomichev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250407190117.16528-4-kuba@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=hramamurthy@google.com \
    --cc=jdamato@fastly.com \
    --cc=kuniyu@amazon.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).