netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
	andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me,
	hramamurthy@google.com, kuniyu@amazon.com, jdamato@fastly.com
Subject: [PATCH net-next 4/8] netdev: don't hold rtnl_lock over nl queue info get when possible
Date: Mon,  7 Apr 2025 12:01:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250407190117.16528-5-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250407190117.16528-1-kuba@kernel.org>

Netdev queue dump accesses: NAPI, memory providers, XSk pointers.
All three are "ops protected" now, switch to the op compat locking.
rtnl lock does not have to be taken for "ops locked" devices.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
---
 net/core/netdev-genl.c | 18 +++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/netdev-genl.c b/net/core/netdev-genl.c
index 5d7af50fe702..7ef9b0191936 100644
--- a/net/core/netdev-genl.c
+++ b/net/core/netdev-genl.c
@@ -481,18 +481,15 @@ int netdev_nl_queue_get_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
 	if (!rsp)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	rtnl_lock();
-
-	netdev = netdev_get_by_index_lock(genl_info_net(info), ifindex);
+	netdev = netdev_get_by_index_lock_ops_compat(genl_info_net(info),
+						     ifindex);
 	if (netdev) {
 		err = netdev_nl_queue_fill(rsp, netdev, q_id, q_type, info);
-		netdev_unlock(netdev);
+		netdev_unlock_ops_compat(netdev);
 	} else {
 		err = -ENODEV;
 	}
 
-	rtnl_unlock();
-
 	if (err)
 		goto err_free_msg;
 
@@ -541,17 +538,17 @@ int netdev_nl_queue_get_dumpit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
 	if (info->attrs[NETDEV_A_QUEUE_IFINDEX])
 		ifindex = nla_get_u32(info->attrs[NETDEV_A_QUEUE_IFINDEX]);
 
-	rtnl_lock();
 	if (ifindex) {
-		netdev = netdev_get_by_index_lock(net, ifindex);
+		netdev = netdev_get_by_index_lock_ops_compat(net, ifindex);
 		if (netdev) {
 			err = netdev_nl_queue_dump_one(netdev, skb, info, ctx);
-			netdev_unlock(netdev);
+			netdev_unlock_ops_compat(netdev);
 		} else {
 			err = -ENODEV;
 		}
 	} else {
-		for_each_netdev_lock_scoped(net, netdev, ctx->ifindex) {
+		for_each_netdev_lock_ops_compat_scoped(net, netdev,
+						       ctx->ifindex) {
 			err = netdev_nl_queue_dump_one(netdev, skb, info, ctx);
 			if (err < 0)
 				break;
@@ -559,7 +556,6 @@ int netdev_nl_queue_get_dumpit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
 			ctx->txq_idx = 0;
 		}
 	}
-	rtnl_unlock();
 
 	return err;
 }
-- 
2.49.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-04-07 19:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-07 19:01 [PATCH net-next 0/8] net: depend on instance lock for queue related netlink ops Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-07 19:01 ` [PATCH net-next 1/8] net: avoid potential race between netdev_get_by_index_lock() and netns switch Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-08  2:40   ` Joe Damato
2025-04-07 19:01 ` [PATCH net-next 2/8] net: designate XSK pool pointers in queues as "ops protected" Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-08  2:17   ` Joe Damato
2025-04-08 14:59     ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-07 19:01 ` [PATCH net-next 3/8] netdev: add "ops compat locking" helpers Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-08  2:41   ` Joe Damato
2025-04-07 19:01 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-04-08  2:28   ` [PATCH net-next 4/8] netdev: don't hold rtnl_lock over nl queue info get when possible Joe Damato
2025-04-07 19:01 ` [PATCH net-next 5/8] xdp: double protect netdev->xdp_flags with netdev->lock Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-08  2:30   ` Joe Damato
2025-04-07 19:01 ` [PATCH net-next 6/8] netdev: depend on netdev->lock for xdp features Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-08  2:31   ` Joe Damato
2025-04-07 19:01 ` [PATCH net-next 7/8] docs: netdev: break down the instance locking info per ops struct Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-08  2:34   ` Joe Damato
2025-04-08 15:08     ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-07 19:01 ` [PATCH net-next 8/8] netdev: depend on netdev->lock for qstats in ops locked drivers Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-08  2:37   ` Joe Damato
2025-04-08  0:28 ` [PATCH net-next 0/8] net: depend on instance lock for queue related netlink ops Stanislav Fomichev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250407190117.16528-5-kuba@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=hramamurthy@google.com \
    --cc=jdamato@fastly.com \
    --cc=kuniyu@amazon.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).