From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@amd.com>
Cc: <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>, <brett.creeley@amd.com>,
<davem@davemloft.net>, <edumazet@google.com>, <pabeni@redhat.com>,
<michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com>, <horms@kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net 2/5] pds_core: remove extra name description
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 17:36:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250414173610.5dc3be9d@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250411003209.44053-3-shannon.nelson@amd.com>
On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 17:32:06 -0700 Shannon Nelson wrote:
> Fix the kernel-doc complaint
> include/linux/pds/pds_adminq.h:481: warning: Excess struct member 'name' description in 'pds_core_lif_getattr_comp'
>
> Fixes: 45d76f492938 ("pds_core: set up device and adminq")
How is this a bug fix? The warnings are only generated on W=1 builds.
Please be more considerate of folks maintaining stable trees. There's
no need to waste their time with patches like this.
--
pw-bot: cr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-15 0:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-11 0:32 [PATCH v2 net 0/5] pds_core: updates and fixes Shannon Nelson
2025-04-11 0:32 ` [PATCH v2 net 1/5] pds_core: Prevent possible adminq overflow/stuck condition Shannon Nelson
2025-04-11 18:59 ` Simon Horman
2025-04-11 0:32 ` [PATCH v2 net 2/5] pds_core: remove extra name description Shannon Nelson
2025-04-15 0:36 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-04-15 23:15 ` Nelson, Shannon
2025-04-11 0:32 ` [PATCH v2 net 3/5] pds_core: handle unsupported PDS_CORE_CMD_FW_CONTROL result Shannon Nelson
2025-04-11 19:00 ` Simon Horman
2025-04-11 0:32 ` [PATCH v2 net 4/5] pds_core: Remove unnecessary check in pds_client_adminq_cmd() Shannon Nelson
2025-04-11 0:32 ` [PATCH v2 net 5/5] pds_core: make wait_context part of q_info Shannon Nelson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250414173610.5dc3be9d@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=brett.creeley@amd.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=shannon.nelson@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).