From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@gmail.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
pabeni@redhat.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, sdf@fomichev.me, jacob.e.keller@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/8] tools: ynl-gen: don't declare loop iterator in place
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 06:45:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250416064505.220f26e8@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m234e8mndc.fsf@gmail.com>
On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 11:06:39 +0100 Donald Hunter wrote:
> > def put_req_nested(ri, struct):
> > + local_vars = []
> > + init_lines = []
> > +
> > + local_vars.append('struct nlattr *nest;')
> > + init_lines.append("nest = ynl_attr_nest_start(nlh, attr_type);")
>
> Minor nit: the series uses += ['...'] elsewhere, is it worth being
> consistent?
Agreed, it was annoying me too.. but in _multi_parse() I seem to have
used .append() in the exact same scenario. Hard to define "consistent"
in this code base :(
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-16 13:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-14 21:18 [PATCH net 0/8] ynl: avoid leaks in attr override and spec fixes for C Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-14 21:18 ` [PATCH net 1/8] tools: ynl-gen: don't declare loop iterator in place Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-16 10:06 ` Donald Hunter
2025-04-16 13:45 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-04-16 16:20 ` Keller, Jacob E
2025-04-14 21:18 ` [PATCH net 2/8] tools: ynl-gen: move local vars after the opening bracket Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-16 9:56 ` Donald Hunter
2025-04-14 21:18 ` [PATCH net 3/8] tools: ynl-gen: individually free previous values on double set Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-16 10:06 ` Donald Hunter
2025-04-14 21:18 ` [PATCH net 4/8] tools: ynl-gen: make sure we validate subtype of array-nest Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-16 10:07 ` Donald Hunter
2025-04-14 21:18 ` [PATCH net 5/8] netlink: specs: rt-link: add an attr layer around alt-ifname Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-16 10:08 ` Donald Hunter
2025-04-14 21:18 ` [PATCH net 6/8] netlink: specs: rtnetlink: attribute naming corrections Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-16 10:09 ` Donald Hunter
2025-04-14 21:18 ` [PATCH net 7/8] netlink: specs: rt-link: adjust mctp attribute naming Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-16 10:10 ` Donald Hunter
2025-04-14 21:18 ` [PATCH net 8/8] netlink: specs: rt-neigh: prefix struct nfmsg members with ndm Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-16 10:11 ` Donald Hunter
2025-04-15 17:39 ` [PATCH net 0/8] ynl: avoid leaks in attr override and spec fixes for C Jacob Keller
2025-04-17 1:21 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250416064505.220f26e8@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=donald.hunter@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).