From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 099E324EF68 for ; Wed, 16 Apr 2025 13:45:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744811107; cv=none; b=PXg9A5vaXL7FsOFu9Q82i/ihGLXmE5VZxozPn/sysiCpaVsGU6pq9LxdxL3NAw+yh6MrAtY+9M4/gcBNmOQFR5WSrqSV+zJXa/KrAteXFej3P0raWKbu57o9JmsEj3gKN2kieJ5MeAeM0stzuGrihm7lI3pp7YRcXwFXlCutsn0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744811107; c=relaxed/simple; bh=09n1pHzq7xsPf1WoNTuzo5/94vpJGWWJ1LSb8D2ZGTY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=GRvlN2Esubqi333It+P83fxYX+cZxMbuuZRWoZSydoi7DGufbB+zNFspB3GumBq2pjyqWlaP8bewjgSDF+uF+kkWgtBit7NN4ShUAgddQrSmIbC61YTfzZgj/EcyVDeAX7GIThlTU8J5tx87d6DF9lS2lMNqFmoEoWdTpBTBiu0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=QI7RTDIr; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="QI7RTDIr" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 241D1C4CEED; Wed, 16 Apr 2025 13:45:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1744811106; bh=09n1pHzq7xsPf1WoNTuzo5/94vpJGWWJ1LSb8D2ZGTY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=QI7RTDIr8OckBbsg8vakCxAd0L6cgcrkw2VWZCEucMWONITTuX/cn0HkLls4DDZMk pQM99353CdHmSLMZ3uaF6VW23fOh3OkYDBw2wJEtDIIiQZ0MBr9xGVLWNeyJ2e0Bob XCofHcM22CpxpYj0yJKqRWzPkF+o5O3XJY1cPkZ/C3gU9QdxSpbM8cHKPYVvI8d7Pc zuNuUDUAAqoWQ8IGVkoG9AZWy05GySgymIn3xxDvi6sjzVfF+vqmCy17hXSVBdyUX6 aM5ME4qoontmdTmWi3h9wycni8vx1fjQXrdwa0z29bRVsYiUjFpEOHk4qmIM+xRXAh TKxsnGVymyWuQ== Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 06:45:05 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Donald Hunter Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, sdf@fomichev.me, jacob.e.keller@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/8] tools: ynl-gen: don't declare loop iterator in place Message-ID: <20250416064505.220f26e8@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20250414211851.602096-1-kuba@kernel.org> <20250414211851.602096-2-kuba@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 11:06:39 +0100 Donald Hunter wrote: > > def put_req_nested(ri, struct): > > + local_vars = [] > > + init_lines = [] > > + > > + local_vars.append('struct nlattr *nest;') > > + init_lines.append("nest = ynl_attr_nest_start(nlh, attr_type);") > > Minor nit: the series uses += ['...'] elsewhere, is it worth being > consistent? Agreed, it was annoying me too.. but in _multi_parse() I seem to have used .append() in the exact same scenario. Hard to define "consistent" in this code base :(