From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
To: <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: <davem@davemloft.net>, <dsahern@kernel.org>,
<edumazet@google.com>, <horms@kernel.org>, <kuba@kernel.org>,
<kuni1840@gmail.com>, <kuniyu@amazon.com>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 net-next 04/14] ipv6: Check GATEWAY in rtm_to_fib6_multipath_config().
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 11:48:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250416184845.293-1-kuniyu@amazon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1c382acc-d823-47e9-902d-42606d64daf1@redhat.com>
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 11:06:30 +0200
> On 4/14/25 8:14 PM, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> > In ip6_route_multipath_add(), we call rt6_qualify_for_ecmp() for each
> > entry. If it returns false, the request fails.
> >
> > rt6_qualify_for_ecmp() returns false if either of the conditions below
> > is true:
> >
> > 1. f6i->fib6_flags has RTF_ADDRCONF
> > 2. f6i->nh is not NULL
> > 3. f6i->fib6_nh->fib_nh_gw_family is AF_UNSPEC
> >
> > 1 is unnecessary because rtm_to_fib6_config() never sets RTF_ADDRCONF
> > to cfg->fc_flags.
> >
> > 2. is equivalent with cfg->fc_nh_id.
> >
> > 3. can be replaced by checking RTF_GATEWAY in the base and each multipath
> > entry because AF_INET6 is set to f6i->fib6_nh->fib_nh_gw_family only when
> > cfg.fc_is_fdb is true or RTF_GATEWAY is set, but the former is always
> > false.
> >
> > Let's perform the equivalent checks in rtm_to_fib6_multipath_config().
>
> It's unclear to me the 'why'???
It's just because this validation does not need to be done under RCU.
Or are you asking why I didn't use rt6_qualify_for_ecmp() ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-16 18:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-14 18:14 [PATCH RESEND v2 net-next 00/14] ipv6: No RTNL for IPv6 routing table Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-04-14 18:14 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 net-next 01/14] ipv6: Validate RTA_GATEWAY of RTA_MULTIPATH in rtm_to_fib6_config() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-04-16 8:22 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-04-17 17:53 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-04-14 18:14 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 net-next 02/14] ipv6: Get rid of RTNL for SIOCDELRT and RTM_DELROUTE Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-04-16 8:49 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-04-16 18:45 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-04-17 6:46 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-04-17 17:45 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-04-14 18:14 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 net-next 03/14] ipv6: Move some validation from ip6_route_info_create() to rtm_to_fib6_config() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-04-16 8:54 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-04-14 18:14 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 net-next 04/14] ipv6: Check GATEWAY in rtm_to_fib6_multipath_config() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-04-16 9:06 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-04-16 18:48 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima [this message]
2025-04-14 18:14 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 net-next 05/14] ipv6: Move nexthop_find_by_id() after fib6_info_alloc() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-04-16 9:13 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-04-14 18:14 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 net-next 06/14] ipv6: Split ip6_route_info_create() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-04-16 9:12 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-04-16 18:50 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-04-14 18:14 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 net-next 07/14] ipv6: Preallocate rt->fib6_nh->rt6i_pcpu in ip6_route_info_create() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-04-16 9:21 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-04-16 9:37 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-04-16 18:55 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-04-16 9:23 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-04-14 18:14 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 net-next 08/14] ipv6: Preallocate nhc_pcpu_rth_output " Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-04-14 18:14 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 net-next 09/14] ipv6: Don't pass net to ip6_route_info_append() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-04-16 9:39 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-04-14 18:14 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 net-next 10/14] ipv6: Factorise ip6_route_multipath_add() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-04-16 9:57 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-04-16 18:58 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-04-14 18:14 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 net-next 11/14] ipv6: Protect fib6_link_table() with spinlock Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-04-16 10:00 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-04-14 18:15 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 net-next 12/14] ipv6: Defer fib6_purge_rt() in fib6_add_rt2node() to fib6_add() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-04-16 13:59 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-04-14 18:15 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 net-next 13/14] ipv6: Protect nh->f6i_list with spinlock and flag Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-04-16 15:17 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-04-16 19:02 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-04-14 18:15 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 net-next 14/14] ipv6: Get rid of RTNL for SIOCADDRT and RTM_NEWROUTE Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-04-16 15:26 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-04-16 19:04 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250416184845.293-1-kuniyu@amazon.com \
--to=kuniyu@amazon.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuni1840@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).