From: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexandra Winter <wintera@linux.ibm.com>,
Thorsten Winkler <twinkler@linux.ibm.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] s390: ism: Pass string literal as format argument of dev_set_name()
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 13:08:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250417110814.12521Bf4-hca@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250417-ism-str-fmt-v1-1-9818b029874d@kernel.org>
On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 11:28:23AM +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
> GCC 14.2.0 reports that passing a non-string literal as the
> format argument of dev_set_name() is potentially insecure.
>
> drivers/s390/net/ism_drv.c: In function 'ism_probe':
> drivers/s390/net/ism_drv.c:615:2: warning: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Wformat-security]
> 615 | dev_set_name(&ism->dev, dev_name(&pdev->dev));
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> It seems to me that as pdev is a PCIE device then the dev_name
> call above should always return the device's BDF, e.g. 00:12.0.
> That this should not contain format escape sequences. And thus
> the current usage is safe.
>
> But, it seems better to be safe than sorry. And, as a bonus, compiler
> output becomes less verbose by addressing this issue.
>
> Compile tested only.
> No functional change intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/s390/net/ism_drv.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
It might make sense to say that -Wformat-security was explicitly enabled in
order to trigger this (probably with KCFLAGS=-Wformat-security ?), since this
warning is by default disabled.
Just mentioning this, since I was wondering why I haven't seen this.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-17 11:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-17 10:28 [PATCH net-next] s390: ism: Pass string literal as format argument of dev_set_name() Simon Horman
2025-04-17 11:08 ` Heiko Carstens [this message]
2025-04-24 16:28 ` Simon Horman
2025-04-22 9:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250417110814.12521Bf4-hca@linux.ibm.com \
--to=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=twinkler@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=wintera@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).