From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: 'Alexei Starovoitov ' <ast@kernel.org>,
'Andrii Nakryiko ' <andrii@kernel.org>,
'Daniel Borkmann ' <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
'Amery Hung ' <ameryhung@gmail.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH bpf-next 02/12] bpf: Simplify reg0 marking for the rbtree kfuncs that return a bpf_rb_node pointer
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 15:46:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250418224652.105998-3-martin.lau@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250418224652.105998-1-martin.lau@linux.dev>
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
The current rbtree kfunc, bpf_rbtree_{first, remove}, returns the
bpf_rb_node pointer. The check_kfunc_call currently checks the
kfunc btf_id instead of its return pointer type to decide
if it needs to do mark_reg_graph_node(reg0) and ref_set_non_owning(reg0).
The later patch will add bpf_rbtree_{root,left,right} that will also
return a bpf_rb_node pointer. Instead of adding more kfunc btf_id
checks to the "if" case, this patch changes the test to check the
kfunc's return type. is_rbtree_node_type() function is added to
test if a pointer type is a bpf_rb_node. The callers have already
skipped the modifiers of the pointer type.
A note on the ref_set_non_owning(), although bpf_rbtree_remove()
also returns a bpf_rb_node pointer, the bpf_rbtree_remove()
has the KF_ACQUIRE flag. Thus, its reg0 will not become non-owning.
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 10 +++++++---
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 2e1ce7debc16..bf14da00f09a 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -11987,6 +11987,11 @@ static bool is_kfunc_arg_res_spin_lock(const struct btf *btf, const struct btf_p
return __is_kfunc_ptr_arg_type(btf, arg, KF_ARG_RES_SPIN_LOCK_ID);
}
+static bool is_rbtree_node_type(const struct btf_type *t)
+{
+ return t == btf_type_by_id(btf_vmlinux, kf_arg_btf_ids[KF_ARG_RB_NODE_ID]);
+}
+
static bool is_kfunc_arg_callback(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, const struct btf *btf,
const struct btf_param *arg)
{
@@ -13750,8 +13755,7 @@ static int check_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
struct btf_field *field = meta.arg_list_head.field;
mark_reg_graph_node(regs, BPF_REG_0, &field->graph_root);
- } else if (meta.func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_rbtree_remove] ||
- meta.func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_rbtree_first]) {
+ } else if (is_rbtree_node_type(ptr_type)) {
struct btf_field *field = meta.arg_rbtree_root.field;
mark_reg_graph_node(regs, BPF_REG_0, &field->graph_root);
@@ -13881,7 +13885,7 @@ static int check_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
if (is_kfunc_ret_null(&meta))
regs[BPF_REG_0].id = id;
regs[BPF_REG_0].ref_obj_id = id;
- } else if (meta.func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_rbtree_first]) {
+ } else if (is_rbtree_node_type(ptr_type)) {
ref_set_non_owning(env, ®s[BPF_REG_0]);
}
--
2.47.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-18 22:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-18 22:46 [RFC PATCH bpf-next 00/12] bpf: A fq example similar to the kernel sch_fq.c implementation Martin KaFai Lau
2025-04-18 22:46 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 01/12] bpf: Check KF_bpf_rbtree_add_impl for the "case KF_ARG_PTR_TO_RB_NODE" Martin KaFai Lau
2025-04-22 1:05 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-04-18 22:46 ` Martin KaFai Lau [this message]
2025-04-22 1:14 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 02/12] bpf: Simplify reg0 marking for the rbtree kfuncs that return a bpf_rb_node pointer Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-04-18 22:46 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 03/12] bpf: Add bpf_rbtree_{root,left,right} kfunc Martin KaFai Lau
2025-04-22 1:43 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-04-18 22:46 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 04/12] selftests/bpf: Adjust failure message in the rbtree_fail test Martin KaFai Lau
2025-04-22 1:44 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-04-18 22:46 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 05/12] bpf: Allow refcounted bpf_rb_node used in bpf_rbtree_{remove,left,right} Martin KaFai Lau
2025-04-22 2:32 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-04-18 22:46 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 06/12] selftests/bpf: Adjust test that does not allow refcounted node in rbtree_remove Martin KaFai Lau
2025-04-22 2:36 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-04-22 2:48 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-04-18 22:46 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 07/12] selftests/bpf: Add rbtree_search test Martin KaFai Lau
2025-04-22 3:03 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-04-18 22:46 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 08/12] bpf: Simplify reg0 marking for the list kfuncs that return a bpf_list_node pointer Martin KaFai Lau
2025-04-22 3:05 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-04-18 22:46 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 09/12] bpf: Add bpf_list_{front,back} kfunc Martin KaFai Lau
2025-04-22 3:07 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-04-18 22:46 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 10/12] selftests/bpf: Add test for bpf_list_{front,back} Martin KaFai Lau
2025-04-22 3:08 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-04-25 23:28 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-04-18 22:46 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 11/12] bpf: net: Add a qdisc kfunc to set sk_pacing_status Martin KaFai Lau
2025-04-18 22:46 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 12/12] selftests/bpf: A bpf fq implementation similar to the kernel sch_fq Martin KaFai Lau
2025-04-25 0:13 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-04-25 23:50 ` Martin KaFai Lau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250418224652.105998-3-martin.lau@linux.dev \
--to=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=ameryhung@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).