From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-180.mta1.migadu.com (out-180.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.180]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65A38254856 for ; Fri, 18 Apr 2025 22:47:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.180 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1745016443; cv=none; b=pjQAZbjcXBI10K56owWtKOUZrhmcUxrEQ+ifi0+GMZ/nBNYw7sYwiz+lHrgWlQeDcssHBA0GhGDOr0HaKV09Y9Utaty4ZvwDVRlQx5QuLTOE3rAjhE21B7Kcp3CiZ1VGbmXbCZbLevGWpDEtYDpWxYaMpzX+Q4lWCbZBH2GruPM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1745016443; c=relaxed/simple; bh=CuNEOL40Y2GqHx4FswXb7VriAJlwIBnumV/8NdjK9hA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=RKWi4zwFy9LXOxbqWVQcL5kinr3/ymzv1jigat4uzLlrvzuMTaUjpOYDIiVZQHgkXqNSylXlzRdGAxty4YC22MyXIUva61gsloqP/Op/6zBGi3AYZPbaEKzhQFLvwWoxKeGYb5o6+Z857r6I/syI4pHY/bpapAd8DDaVaWgeU1Y= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=OicXXmds; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.180 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="OicXXmds" X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1745016439; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=X5xTbmm3lU0hsicQ+mtYw0M8HKq+iogNgwvIHDGq7w8=; b=OicXXmdsPgI742mGCSlQ+83AyAPHl2QrfQzYqbuHJp7KKjb3HRnhw3DE4Om9agpCCl+Fpy 2evy3DxIK4c/l1oq7kRZq+f/SmhpnOcOJNCgExrQc92h3B5nCm2LS2PPaQIJcjSZQYFrOL HyW6UwTw5w7CVY+EqILs8M/RUQ1jD/A= From: Martin KaFai Lau To: bpf@vger.kernel.org Cc: 'Alexei Starovoitov ' , 'Andrii Nakryiko ' , 'Daniel Borkmann ' , netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com, 'Amery Hung ' Subject: [RFC PATCH bpf-next 04/12] selftests/bpf: Adjust failure message in the rbtree_fail test Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 15:46:42 -0700 Message-ID: <20250418224652.105998-5-martin.lau@linux.dev> In-Reply-To: <20250418224652.105998-1-martin.lau@linux.dev> References: <20250418224652.105998-1-martin.lau@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT From: Martin KaFai Lau Some of the failure messages in the rbtree_fail test. The message is now "bpf_rbtree_remove can only take non-owning bpf_rb_node pointer". Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/rbtree_fail.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/rbtree_fail.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/rbtree_fail.c index dbd5eee8e25e..528122320471 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/rbtree_fail.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/rbtree_fail.c @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ long rbtree_api_nolock_first(void *ctx) } SEC("?tc") -__failure __msg("rbtree_remove node input must be non-owning ref") +__failure __msg("bpf_rbtree_remove can only take non-owning bpf_rb_node pointer") long rbtree_api_remove_unadded_node(void *ctx) { struct node_data *n, *m; @@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ long rbtree_api_use_unchecked_remove_retval(void *ctx) } SEC("?tc") -__failure __msg("rbtree_remove node input must be non-owning ref") +__failure __msg("bpf_rbtree_remove can only take non-owning bpf_rb_node pointer") long rbtree_api_add_release_unlock_escape(void *ctx) { struct node_data *n; @@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ long rbtree_api_add_release_unlock_escape(void *ctx) } SEC("?tc") -__failure __msg("rbtree_remove node input must be non-owning ref") +__failure __msg("bpf_rbtree_remove can only take non-owning bpf_rb_node pointer") long rbtree_api_first_release_unlock_escape(void *ctx) { struct bpf_rb_node *res; -- 2.47.1