From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 805712153F1 for ; Tue, 22 Apr 2025 23:51:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1745365876; cv=none; b=jRKq+RBS3KCwIJP9tZKnA0ILwx3q2eyVsOhVtWhFGMIrF9mKRNubfOKxD4kvH6wB2mg806HC8X0m6mPAp1U7y9kODBFhG1zLohAhQOUjAB5ORAm+LLzYWNxrlP/8MBVZq9lfg+uli2Syd9bMG+8km1B3UNHGaESQE5uIhGFW7K8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1745365876; c=relaxed/simple; bh=CHTDlU9BxgzuLjgpREQqER2HjlVFE8cfDXhpACU6sfc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=pDZ7QoaTlEO93JbDtsN5X7JPJJQGPyxT+yGY2DjTxwmurJ/NIS+ovud1JJNLGGsAELevhGw0OVMfrcZgKAgBCiW+cQOiDm2DyzHHWGoiz2uQMYxAOPNdJWgDKrPB5TFsKN4UofA+/ERcu5f9NNqBiOJ74ofS8l2NUuF851pmbIc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=d2g72zWP; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="d2g72zWP" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B49C2C4CEEC; Tue, 22 Apr 2025 23:51:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1745365876; bh=CHTDlU9BxgzuLjgpREQqER2HjlVFE8cfDXhpACU6sfc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=d2g72zWPfobjVbVky4OBy87MwakggBhwwVvQkHJLijzSumzBIkdDA8GwI7Uku76yW ieAsZq3eTI2smm2e5ge2lD1hRJLxVrr0jzm5xbNekLJ8yQfs3PfxlJhVoz/SDL8U9R y0vFtlOVAXdNcaj9CvVA9yBv6LYJ43W/mFBuUQYimBEE+GIyEk6gUIUfoxQCzavb4S B2tDgswSGv2HxO47l/qB4ABWrvIIKhTGEX019uxFIqpbJhPTI0ejJTENEe0fYqMb/E 2c954sTfCUfT3YhpSETxkIhDXsnsx09uD6hzIMGNZWyr5+VZxiK4IxXdQ0UuVjUGRg v5mwIe/SjFhkA== Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 16:51:14 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Andrew Lunn Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" , Alexander Duyck , netdev@vger.kernel.org, hkallweit1@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net, pabeni@redhat.com Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 0/2] net: phylink: Fix issue w/ BMC link flap Message-ID: <20250422165114.23a36b01@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <06490a1a-427c-4e35-b9c3-154a0c88ed60@lunn.ch> <20250421182143.56509949@kernel.org> <20250422082806.6224c602@kernel.org> <08b79b2c-8078-4180-9b74-7cd03b2b06f7@lunn.ch> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 20:13:43 +0200 Andrew Lunn wrote: > > Should one host have control, or should the BMC have control? I don't > > actually know what you're talking about w.r.t. DSP0222 or whatever it > > was, nor NC-SI - I don't have these documents. > > I gave a reference to it a few email back in the conversation: > > https://www.dmtf.org/sites/default/files/standards/documents/DSP0222_1.2.0.pdf > > Linux has an implementation of the protocol in net/nsci But to be clear the implementation is for when Linux runs as the BMC. It does not interact in any way with the host AFAIU.