From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>,
Qasim Ijaz <qasdev00@gmail.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 7/7] net: register debugfs file for net_device refcnt tracker
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 17:32:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250423173231.5c61af5b@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a07cd1c64b16b074d8e1ec2e8c06d31f4f27d5e5.camel@kernel.org>
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 20:04:58 -0400 Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Wed, 2025-04-23 at 16:53 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > Names are not unique and IIUC debugfs is not namespaced.
> > How much naming the objects in a "user readable" fashion actually
> > matter? It'd be less churn to create some kind of "object class"
> > with a directory level named after what's already passed to
> > ref_tracker_dir_init() and then id the objects by the pointer value
> > as sub-dirs of that?
>
> That sounds closer to what I had done originally. Andrew L. suggested
> the flat directory that this version represents. I'm fine with whatever
> hierarchy, but let's decide that before I respin again.
Sorry about that :(
> When I was tracking down net namespace leaks recently, it was very nice
> to have the inode number of the leaked netns's in the filenames. I
> would have probably had to grovel around with drgn to figure out the
> address if that weren't embedded in the name. I think we probably ought
> to leave it up to each subsystem how it names its files. The
> discriminators between different types of objects can vary wildly.
>
> One thing that might be simpler is to make ref_tracker_dir_debugfs() a
> varargs function and allow passing in a format string and set of
> arguments for it. That might make things simpler for the callers.
Yes, cutting out the formatting in the callers would definitely
be a win. Maybe that'd make the whole thing sufficiently palatable :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-24 0:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-18 14:24 [PATCH v4 0/7] ref_tracker: add ability to register a debugfs file for a ref_tracker_dir Jeff Layton
2025-04-18 14:24 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] ref_tracker: don't use %pK in pr_ostream() output Jeff Layton
2025-04-23 23:46 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-23 23:56 ` Jeff Layton
2025-04-18 14:24 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] ref_tracker: add a top level debugfs directory for ref_tracker Jeff Layton
2025-04-18 14:24 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] ref_tracker: have callers pass output function to pr_ostream() Jeff Layton
2025-04-18 14:24 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] ref_tracker: allow pr_ostream() to print directly to a seq_file Jeff Layton
2025-04-18 14:24 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] ref_tracker: add ability to register a file in debugfs for a ref_tracker_dir Jeff Layton
2025-04-18 14:24 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] net: add ref_tracker_dir_debugfs() calls for netns refcount tracking Jeff Layton
2025-04-18 14:24 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] net: register debugfs file for net_device refcnt tracker Jeff Layton
2025-04-23 23:53 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-24 0:04 ` Jeff Layton
2025-04-24 0:32 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-04-24 10:56 ` Jeff Layton
2025-04-24 12:10 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-04-24 22:52 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-24 23:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-04-25 12:40 ` Jeff Layton
2025-04-25 12:46 ` Jeff Layton
2025-04-23 23:44 ` [PATCH v4 0/7] ref_tracker: add ability to register a debugfs file for a ref_tracker_dir Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-23 23:48 ` Jeff Layton
2025-04-23 23:56 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250423173231.5c61af5b@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@amazon.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=qasdev00@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).