From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, tom@herbertland.com,
"Eric Dumazet" <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>,
dsahern@kernel.org, makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp,
kernel-team@cloudflare.com, phil@nwl.cc
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V6 2/2] veth: apply qdisc backpressure on full ptr_ring to reduce TX drops
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 07:23:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250424072352.18aa0df1@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <174549940981.608169.4363875844729313831.stgit@firesoul>
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 14:56:49 +0200 Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> + case NETDEV_TX_BUSY:
> + /* If a qdisc is attached to our virtual device, returning
> + * NETDEV_TX_BUSY is allowed.
> + */
> + txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(dev, rxq);
> +
> + if (qdisc_txq_has_no_queue(txq)) {
> + dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
> + goto drop;
> + }
> + netif_tx_stop_queue(txq);
> + /* Restore Eth hdr pulled by dev_forward_skb/eth_type_trans */
> + __skb_push(skb, ETH_HLEN);
> + /* Depend on prior success packets started NAPI consumer via
> + * __veth_xdp_flush(). Cancel TXQ stop if consumer stopped,
> + * paired with empty check in veth_poll().
> + */
> + if (unlikely(__ptr_ring_empty(&rq->xdp_ring)))
> + netif_tx_wake_queue(txq);
Looks like I wrote a reply to v5 but didn't hit send. But I may have
set v5 to Changes Requested because of it :S Here is my comment:
I think this is missing a memory barrier. When drivers do this dance
there's usually a barrier between stop and recheck, to make sure the
stop is visible before we check. And vice versa veth_xdp_rcv() needs
to make sure other side sees the "empty" indication before it checks
if the queue is stopped.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-24 14:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-24 12:56 [PATCH net-next V6 0/2] veth: qdisc backpressure and qdisc check refactor Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2025-04-24 12:56 ` [PATCH net-next V6 1/2] net: sched: generalize check for no-queue qdisc on TX queue Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2025-04-24 12:56 ` [PATCH net-next V6 2/2] veth: apply qdisc backpressure on full ptr_ring to reduce TX drops Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2025-04-24 14:23 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-04-24 15:24 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2025-04-24 15:53 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-25 13:55 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250424072352.18aa0df1@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@cloudflare.com \
--cc=makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=phil@nwl.cc \
--cc=toke@toke.dk \
--cc=tom@herbertland.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).