From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org>
Cc: Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>, Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3] net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: convert cap_bit in mtk_eth_muxc struct to u64
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 19:43:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250424184311.GM3042781@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ded98b0d716c3203017a7a92151516ec2bf1abee.1745369249.git.daniel@makrotopia.org>
On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 01:48:02AM +0100, Daniel Golle wrote:
> From: Bo-Cun Chen <bc-bocun.chen@mediatek.com>
>
> With commit 51a4df60db5c2 ("net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: convert caps in
> mtk_soc_data struct to u64") the capabilities bitfield was converted to
> a 64-bit value, but a cap_bit in struct mtk_eth_muxc which is used to
> store a full bitfield (rather than the bit number, as the name would
> suggest) still holds only a 32-bit value.
>
> Change the type of cap_bit to u64 in order to avoid truncating the
> bitfield which results in path selection to not work with capabilities
> above the 32-bit limit.
>
> The values currently stored in the cap_bit field are
> MTK_ETH_MUX_GDM1_TO_GMAC1_ESW:
> BIT_ULL(18) | BIT_ULL(5)
>
> MTK_ETH_MUX_GMAC2_GMAC0_TO_GEPHY:
> BIT_ULL(19) | BIT_ULL(5) | BIT_ULL(6)
>
> MTK_ETH_MUX_U3_GMAC2_TO_QPHY:
> BIT_ULL(20) | BIT_ULL(5) | BIT_ULL(6)
>
> MTK_ETH_MUX_GMAC1_GMAC2_TO_SGMII_RGMII:
> BIT_ULL(20) | BIT_ULL(5) | BIT_ULL(7)
>
> MTK_ETH_MUX_GMAC12_TO_GEPHY_SGMII:
> BIT_ULL(21) | BIT_ULL(5)
>
> While all those values are currently still within 32-bit boundaries,
> the addition of new capabilities of MT7988 as well as future SoC's
> like MT7987 will exceed them. Also, the use of a 32-bit 'int' type to
> store the result of a BIT_ULL(...) is misleading.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bo-Cun Chen <bc-bocun.chen@mediatek.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org>
> ---
> v3: don't use Fixes: tag
> v2: improve commit message
Thanks for the updates.
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-24 18:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-23 0:48 [PATCH net-next v3] net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: convert cap_bit in mtk_eth_muxc struct to u64 Daniel Golle
2025-04-24 18:43 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2025-04-25 0:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-04-17 16:42 Daniel Golle
2025-04-22 17:08 ` Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250424184311.GM3042781@horms.kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=daniel@makrotopia.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=nbd@nbd.name \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sean.wang@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).