netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mrpre@163.com, Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>,
	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
	Boris Pismenny <borisp@nvidia.com>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v1 1/2] ktls, sockmap: Fix missing uncharge operation
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 13:59:57 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250425060015.6968-2-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250425060015.6968-1-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>

When we specify apply_bytes, we divide the msg into multiple segments,
each with a length of 'send', and every time we send this part of the data
using tcp_bpf_sendmsg_redir(), we use sk_msg_return_zero() to uncharge the
memory of the specified 'send' size.

However, if the first segment of data fails to send, for example, the
peer's buffer is full, we need to release all of the msg. When releasing
the msg, we haven't uncharged the memory of the subsequent segments.

This modification does not make significant logical changes, but only
fills in the missing uncharge places.

This issue has existed all along, until it was exposed after we added the
apply test in test_sockmap:
commit 3448ad23b34e ("selftests/bpf: Add apply_bytes test to test_txmsg_redir_wait_sndmem in test_sockmap")

Reported-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/aAmIi0vlycHtbXeb@pop-os.localdomain/T/#t
Fixes: d3b18ad31f93 ("tls: add bpf support to sk_msg handling")
Signed-off-by: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
---
 net/tls/tls_sw.c | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/tls/tls_sw.c b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
index f3d7d19482da..fc88e34b7f33 100644
--- a/net/tls/tls_sw.c
+++ b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
@@ -908,6 +908,13 @@ static int bpf_exec_tx_verdict(struct sk_msg *msg, struct sock *sk,
 					    &msg_redir, send, flags);
 		lock_sock(sk);
 		if (err < 0) {
+			/* Regardless of whether the data represented by
+			 * msg_redir is sent successfully, we have already
+			 * uncharged it via sk_msg_return_zero(). The
+			 * msg->sg.size represents the remaining unprocessed
+			 * data, which needs to be uncharged here.
+			 */
+			sk_mem_uncharge(sk, msg->sg.size);
 			*copied -= sk_msg_free_nocharge(sk, &msg_redir);
 			msg->sg.size = 0;
 		}
-- 
2.47.1


  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-25  6:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-25  5:59 [PATCH bpf-next v1 0/2] ktls, sockmap: Fix missing uncharge operation and add selfttest Jiayuan Chen
2025-04-25  5:59 ` Jiayuan Chen [this message]
2025-04-29  0:14   ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 1/2] ktls, sockmap: Fix missing uncharge operation Cong Wang
2025-04-29  1:55     ` Jiayuan Chen
2025-05-04 20:19   ` Cong Wang
2025-04-25  5:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add test to cover sockmap with ktls Jiayuan Chen
2025-05-02  5:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 0/2] ktls, sockmap: Fix missing uncharge operation and add selfttest John Fastabend

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250425060015.6968-2-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
    --to=jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=borisp@nvidia.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=mrpre@163.com \
    --cc=mykolal@fb.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).