From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Cc: Moshe Shemesh <moshe@nvidia.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@gmail.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 0/5] devlink: Add unique identifier to devlink port function
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 10:51:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250425105145.6095c111@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <l5sll5gx4vw4ykf65vukex3huj677ar5l47iheh4l63e3xtf42@72g3vl5whmek>
On Fri, 25 Apr 2025 13:26:01 +0200 Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Makes sense, tho, could you please use UUID?
>> Let's use industry standards when possible, not "arbitrary strings".
>
> Well, you could make the same request for serial number of asic and board.
> Could be uuids too, but they aren't. I mean, it makes sense to have all
> uids as uuid, but since the fw already exposes couple of uids as
> arbitrary strings, why this one should be treated differently all of the
> sudden?
Are you asking me what the difference is here, or you're just telling
me that I'm wrong and inconsistent?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-25 17:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-23 13:50 [RFC net-next 0/5] devlink: Add unique identifier to devlink port function Moshe Shemesh
2025-04-23 13:50 ` [RFC net-next 1/5] " Moshe Shemesh
2025-04-28 12:33 ` Simon Horman
2025-04-29 9:33 ` Avihai Horon
2025-04-23 13:50 ` [RFC net-next 2/5] net/mlx5: Move mlx5_cmd_query_vuid() from IB to core Moshe Shemesh
2025-04-23 13:50 ` [RFC net-next 3/5] net/mlx5: Add vhca_id argument to mlx5_core_query_vuid() Moshe Shemesh
2025-04-23 13:50 ` [RFC net-next 4/5] net/mlx5: Add define for max VUID string size Moshe Shemesh
2025-04-23 13:50 ` [RFC net-next 5/5] net/mlx5: Expose unique identifier in devlink port function Moshe Shemesh
2025-04-24 23:24 ` [RFC net-next 0/5] devlink: Add unique identifier to " Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-25 11:26 ` Jiri Pirko
2025-04-25 17:51 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-04-28 16:30 ` Jiri Pirko
2025-04-28 12:11 ` Moshe Shemesh
2025-04-28 18:19 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-29 8:37 ` Moshe Shemesh
2025-05-02 0:39 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-05-04 17:46 ` Mark Bloch
2025-05-05 18:55 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-05-06 11:25 ` Mark Bloch
2025-05-06 15:20 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-05-06 15:34 ` Mark Bloch
2025-05-08 0:43 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-05-08 9:04 ` Mark Bloch
2025-05-14 12:01 ` Mark Bloch
2025-05-14 14:52 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250425105145.6095c111@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=donald.hunter@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=mbloch@nvidia.com \
--cc=moshe@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).