From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>,
Gal Pressman <gal@nvidia.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V3 02/15] devlink: define enum for attr types of dynamic attributes
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 10:01:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250429100138.0454967a@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fy5y73vfqfajxnm6hkzd5h4rw4xohz6tormbi6mgnnerptomlv@jwsxzuqdn7io>
On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 13:49:16 +0200 Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >>Why do you keep the DEVLINK_PARAM_TYPE_* defines around?
> >>IMO it'd be fine to just use them directly instead of adding
> >>the new enum, fmsg notwithstanding. But failing that we can rename
> >>in the existing in-tree users to DEVLINK_VAR_ATTR_TYPE_* right?
> >>What does this translating back and forth buy us?
> >
> >Sure, I can do that in a separate patch. I think I will send these
> >patchset separatelly prior to Saeed's patchset.
>
> Hmm, on a second thought, we expose DEVLINK_PARAM_TYPE_* to drivers to
> specify type of driver-specific params:
> git grep DEVLINK_PARAM_TYPE_
> I would like to keep it as part of devlink param api. Looks nicer to me.
> Downside is this switch-case, but who really cares?
Who cares about pointless, duplicated code? I do ✋️
Why do you think it's "nicer" to have DEVLINK_PARAM_TYPE_ and
DEVLINK_VAR_ATTR_TYPE_ be separate things if they define
the same, exact, identical values?
If it's because DEVLINK_VAR_ATTR_TYPE_ has the word _ATTR in
it then I totally agree, lets call it DEVLINK_VAR_TYPE_ :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-29 17:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-25 21:47 [PATCH net-next V3 00/15] devlink, mlx5: Add new parameters for link management and SRIOV/eSwitch configurations Saeed Mahameed
2025-04-25 21:47 ` [PATCH net-next V3 01/15] tools: ynl-gen: allow noncontiguous enums Saeed Mahameed
2025-04-28 23:06 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-29 7:22 ` Jiri Pirko
2025-04-25 21:47 ` [PATCH net-next V3 02/15] devlink: define enum for attr types of dynamic attributes Saeed Mahameed
2025-04-28 23:10 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-29 7:20 ` Jiri Pirko
2025-04-29 11:49 ` Jiri Pirko
2025-04-29 17:01 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-04-25 21:47 ` [PATCH net-next V3 03/15] devlink: Add 'total_vfs' generic device param Saeed Mahameed
2025-04-25 21:47 ` [PATCH net-next V3 04/15] net/mlx5: Implement cqe_compress_type via devlink params Saeed Mahameed
2025-04-25 21:47 ` [PATCH net-next V3 05/15] net/mlx5: Implement devlink enable_sriov parameter Saeed Mahameed
2025-04-25 21:47 ` [PATCH net-next V3 06/15] net/mlx5: Implement devlink total_vfs parameter Saeed Mahameed
2025-04-25 21:48 ` [PATCH net-next V3 07/15] devlink: pass struct devlink_port * as arg to devlink_nl_param_fill() Saeed Mahameed
2025-04-25 21:48 ` [PATCH net-next V3 08/15] devlink: Implement port params registration Saeed Mahameed
2025-04-25 21:48 ` [PATCH net-next V3 09/15] devlink: Implement get/dump netlink commands for port params Saeed Mahameed
2025-04-25 21:48 ` [PATCH net-next V3 10/15] devlink: Implement set netlink command " Saeed Mahameed
2025-04-25 21:48 ` [PATCH net-next V3 11/15] devlink: Add 'keep_link_up' generic devlink device param Saeed Mahameed
2025-04-25 21:48 ` [PATCH net-next V3 12/15] net/mlx5: Implement devlink keep_link_up port parameter Saeed Mahameed
2025-04-25 21:48 ` [PATCH net-next V3 13/15] devlink: Throw extack messages on param value validation error Saeed Mahameed
2025-04-25 21:48 ` [PATCH net-next V3 14/15] devlink: Implement devlink param multi attribute nested data values Saeed Mahameed
2025-04-28 23:17 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-29 11:34 ` Jiri Pirko
2025-04-29 13:54 ` Przemek Kitszel
2025-04-29 16:33 ` Jiri Pirko
2025-04-29 16:58 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-30 6:24 ` Jiri Pirko
2025-05-02 11:16 ` Jiri Pirko
2025-04-25 21:48 ` [PATCH net-next V3 15/15] net/mlx5: Implement eSwitch hairpin per prio buffers devlink params Saeed Mahameed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250429100138.0454967a@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gal@nvidia.com \
--cc=jiri@nvidia.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=leonro@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=saeed@kernel.org \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).