From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD1FF25A358; Wed, 30 Apr 2025 14:23:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746023038; cv=none; b=U+Noyq0k/Ym8PaQSi7Ke0XYG0KwC6sv2O0D4FFhfs5TG6CQV4BTfzFeGQsO++N8m9UtfFMEsvpfAIBsjDT2ZmKKiRl7UMb6LJvZxE22pTshPUnsRDUGCX8DM/idtN8HrM0Ppn0zEOnbItGqrS0+f0nccb3SouuQG11O4UQW6lr0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746023038; c=relaxed/simple; bh=vQpNCpwfOnTdaIvqCMKnbeo0O+wpS7K3veMYLY+EfWE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=RbJZeIrJKEpZX+IZlwZbdsXNDJcAsRrq2vzPa1CgkbO5tYWEfpocCNthP1wi6P6sbOV38seTvkrhDR2eNMQZbdpw6D0sq0DL2+x56/cU2+WSy0X/1vQMGi+p/rQvTtDooIejoXRo/iieTK6m2MsVp/YjwN5gOBXtCG69XMWUrwU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=WC5Z9VX9; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="WC5Z9VX9" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 66969C4CEE7; Wed, 30 Apr 2025 14:23:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1746023037; bh=vQpNCpwfOnTdaIvqCMKnbeo0O+wpS7K3veMYLY+EfWE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=WC5Z9VX90xfRhxGWOo8Xadmqx7sGi8dbrZF6iW4f+7hbRseUJtcOvjbNTOh4wG0Jp VJ+GZ+M/EMpiZT7/sLJ7I2j1xeHwFwjYLN2gzc09JEpZPig0tvGzY9Doc8+ePLycjP yWinWX56NUkR+QsPn0YQrVwkYQpVqxwuu9/UVcDYKbjYxlZteFTC/IbMS5ywdLnQJD MddFwPIPeUxhYe06Qmvrsw01Z0AkNKSEoPCCy0N96OWvz6h4+cNY+Ms9Zj4eRPKs2Q CFF0EiMWQwt54mrMj1BxiiNtIvucqFvYUMZ64J6QhwhssByFiredm/sAxvCZRT8bCj RE7Vqc3z3Ubzw== Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 07:23:55 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Jeff Layton Cc: Andrew Morton , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Thomas Zimmermann , David Airlie , Simona Vetter , Jani Nikula , Joonas Lahtinen , Rodrigo Vivi , Tvrtko Ursulin , Kuniyuki Iwashima , Qasim Ijaz , Nathan Chancellor , Andrew Lunn , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 04/10] ref_tracker: allow pr_ostream() to print directly to a seq_file Message-ID: <20250430072355.73a79f55@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <98d797ae3a65fbe5a5cc586ad43b74655a9ba109.camel@kernel.org> References: <20250428-reftrack-dbgfs-v5-0-1cbbdf2038bd@kernel.org> <20250428-reftrack-dbgfs-v5-4-1cbbdf2038bd@kernel.org> <20250429162704.4729a76a@kernel.org> <98d797ae3a65fbe5a5cc586ad43b74655a9ba109.camel@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 19:18:01 -0700 Jeff Layton wrote: > On Tue, 2025-04-29 at 16:27 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 11:26:27 -0700 Jeff Layton wrote: > > > Allow pr_ostream to also output directly to a seq_file without an > > > intermediate buffer. > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn > > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton > > > > lib/ref_tracker.c:316:12: warning: unused function 'ref_tracker_dir_seq_print' [-Wunused-function] > > 316 | static int ref_tracker_dir_seq_print(struct ref_tracker_dir *dir, struct seq_file *seq) > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > The caller ends up being added in patch #6. I think the only thing I > can do here to silence this is to squash this patch into that one. > > I kind of don't like doing that here because I think the patches are > conceptually separate, and it'll make for a rather large patch. > > Let me know what you prefer. Would it work to make the fops very dumbed down - return an error from open. And then implement the seqfile output as the next patch?