netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Ruben Wauters <rubenru09@aol.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv4: ip_tunnel: Replace strcpy use with strscpy
Date: Thu, 1 May 2025 16:39:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250501153956.GC3339421@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250501012555.92688-1-rubenru09@aol.com>

On Thu, May 01, 2025 at 02:23:00AM +0100, Ruben Wauters wrote:
> Use of strcpy is decpreated, replaces the use of strcpy with strscpy as
> recommended.
> 
> I am aware there is an explicit bounds check above, however using
> strscpy protects against buffer overflows in any future code, and there
> is no good reason I can see to not use it.

Thanks, I agree. This patch doesn't buy us safety. But it doesn't lose
us anything. And allows the code to move towards best practice.

One thing I notices is that this change is is inconsistent with the call to
the 3-argument variant of strscpy a few lines above - it should also be hte
2-argument version. Maybe that could be changed too. Maybe in a
separate patch.

It is customary when making such changes to add a note that
strscpy() was chosen because the code expects a NUL-terminated string
without zero-padding. (Which is the case due to the call to strcat().)
Perhaps you could add some text to the commit message of v2 of this patch?

> Signed-off-by: Ruben Wauters <rubenru09@aol.com>

Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>

> ---
>  net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c b/net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c
> index 3913ec89ad20..9724bbbd0e0a 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c
> @@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ static struct net_device *__ip_tunnel_create(struct net *net,
>  	} else {
>  		if (strlen(ops->kind) > (IFNAMSIZ - 3))
>  			goto failed;
> -		strcpy(name, ops->kind);
> +		strscpy(name, ops->kind);
>  		strcat(name, "%d");
>  	}
>  
> -- 
> 2.48.1
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-01 15:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20250501012555.92688-1-rubenru09.ref@aol.com>
2025-05-01  1:23 ` [PATCH net-next] ipv4: ip_tunnel: Replace strcpy use with strscpy Ruben Wauters
2025-05-01 15:39   ` Simon Horman [this message]
2025-05-01 16:51     ` Ruben Wauters
2025-05-02  9:38       ` Simon Horman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250501153956.GC3339421@horms.kernel.org \
    --to=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=rubenru09@aol.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).