From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [net PATCH 3/6] fbnic: Add additional handling of IRQs
Date: Fri, 2 May 2025 14:51:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250502135153.GL3339421@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <174614221004.126317.3819743775871203479.stgit@ahduyck-xeon-server.home.arpa>
On Thu, May 01, 2025 at 04:30:10PM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> From: Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@fb.com>
>
> We have two issues that need to be addressed in our IRQ handling.
>
> One is the fact that we can end up double-freeing IRQs in the event of an
> exception handling error such as a PCIe reset/recovery that fails. To
> prevent that from becoming an issue we can use the msix_vector values to
> indicate that we have successfully requested/freed the IRQ by only setting
> or clearing them when we have completed the tiven action.
nit: given
>
> The other issue is that we have several potential races in our IRQ path due
> to us manipulating the mask before the vector has been truly disabled. In
> order to handle that in the case of the FW mailbox we need to not
> auto-enable the IRQ and instead will be enabling/disabling it separately.
> In the case of the PCS vector we can mitigate this by unmapping it and
> synchronizing the IRQ before we clear the mask.
>
> The general order of operations after this change is now to request the
> interrupt, poll the FW mailbox to ready, and then enable the interrupt. For
> the shutdown we do the reverse where we disable the interrupt, flush any
> pending Tx, and then free the IRQ. I am renaming the enable/disable to
> request/free to be equivilent with the IRQ calls being used. We may see
> additions in the future to enable/disable the IRQs versus request/free them
> for certain use cases.
Thanks for the nice explanation. And likewise throughout this series.
It's much appreciated.
>
> Fixes: da3cde08209e ("eth: fbnic: Add FW communication mechanism")
> Fixes: 69684376eed5 ("eth: fbnic: Add link detection")
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-02 13:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-01 23:29 [net PATCH 0/6] fbnic: FW IPC Mailbox fixes Alexander Duyck
2025-05-01 23:29 ` [net PATCH 1/6] fbnic: Fix initialization of mailbox descriptor rings Alexander Duyck
2025-05-02 10:49 ` Simon Horman
2025-05-01 23:30 ` [net PATCH 2/6] fbnic: Gate AXI read/write enabling on FW mailbox Alexander Duyck
2025-05-02 10:50 ` Simon Horman
2025-05-01 23:30 ` [net PATCH 3/6] fbnic: Add additional handling of IRQs Alexander Duyck
2025-05-02 13:51 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2025-05-01 23:30 ` [net PATCH 4/6] fbnic: Actually flush_tx instead of stalling out Alexander Duyck
2025-05-02 10:54 ` Simon Horman
2025-05-01 23:30 ` [net PATCH 5/6] fbnic: Cleanup handling of completions Alexander Duyck
2025-05-02 10:45 ` Simon Horman
2025-05-04 14:37 ` Alexander Duyck
2025-05-01 23:30 ` [net PATCH 6/6] fbnic: Pull fbnic_fw_xmit_cap_msg use out of interrupt context Alexander Duyck
2025-05-02 16:54 ` Simon Horman
2025-05-04 14:53 ` Alexander Duyck
2025-05-06 15:50 ` Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250502135153.GL3339421@horms.kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).