From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp-fw-6002.amazon.com (smtp-fw-6002.amazon.com [52.95.49.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7623726FDAA; Mon, 5 May 2025 20:42:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=52.95.49.90 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746477732; cv=none; b=MUOdUKSjgJbjVccHBu71JQp032kyRwbumrPJKhMC+J8UUkN0e87rqH1YyE4ZQj4uaSnsfS02eRkx9w3D2UvEiEOYUtRdwVkWDGNLveBHilFspoX8SQmnUUDQxAmQjDqyoLvy+BS3sSLtOiACt3FaIJDhDDYqSpm3eFLj+GqXYXI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746477732; c=relaxed/simple; bh=dGtv3RQfd81ha2ADXYVqJXeZnAASB8WkWmra4owmmC0=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=E/XoV0jl3rmsNRecgFMoxBN9vYABymoOI44f6e6bCJq0N4ZCNaDAkOVXz7SlIWxy2CXnYnPH+8sR18UiJEKCwtIWT3Q5zzkeN+EP7wWKy2fTVFIK6kY22lt6gBtXtuqJkigS+I99Qwe8y9DTriGKCw/ZDno4j32gJL2RNFXEKBY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=amazon.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=amazon.co.jp; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amazon.com header.i=@amazon.com header.b=dypUlMDa; arc=none smtp.client-ip=52.95.49.90 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=amazon.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=amazon.co.jp Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amazon.com header.i=@amazon.com header.b="dypUlMDa" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=amazon.com; i=@amazon.com; q=dns/txt; s=amazon201209; t=1746477730; x=1778013730; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=G0EXnOP3G7keUVE+ya5D8zXpMtGwAkLtHPqE4Gmd3X0=; b=dypUlMDaQ3aD0qAGjkMUCf6J3Mo5Yto5VKwYgkiGDWGM2l25weU6SUkF HNscWTnSuppa1o+4/DDVHz8OpV880oKVxzLGoaOy+C6RdWvdIjWnNpLNX 0IYRPB+s62QD/t9WLxRCrv6Fa5wdosoe/IKySOHPsEIOud0AAILhIAvan Q=; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,264,1739836800"; d="scan'208";a="495725901" Received: from iad12-co-svc-p1-lb1-vlan3.amazon.com (HELO smtpout.prod.us-west-2.prod.farcaster.email.amazon.dev) ([10.43.8.6]) by smtp-border-fw-6002.iad6.amazon.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 May 2025 20:42:06 +0000 Received: from EX19MTAUWB001.ant.amazon.com [10.0.38.20:18793] by smtpin.naws.us-west-2.prod.farcaster.email.amazon.dev [10.0.59.114:2525] with esmtp (Farcaster) id f9ec8b4f-e323-4cd6-9ab9-e9c3fe307cb0; Mon, 5 May 2025 20:42:05 +0000 (UTC) X-Farcaster-Flow-ID: f9ec8b4f-e323-4cd6-9ab9-e9c3fe307cb0 Received: from EX19D004ANA001.ant.amazon.com (10.37.240.138) by EX19MTAUWB001.ant.amazon.com (10.250.64.248) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA) id 15.2.1544.14; Mon, 5 May 2025 20:42:04 +0000 Received: from 6c7e67bfbae3.amazon.com (10.187.170.18) by EX19D004ANA001.ant.amazon.com (10.37.240.138) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA) id 15.2.1544.14; Mon, 5 May 2025 20:42:00 +0000 From: Kuniyuki Iwashima To: CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 08/10] net, pidfs, coredump: only allow coredumping tasks to connect to coredump socket Date: Mon, 5 May 2025 13:41:20 -0700 Message-ID: <20250505204152.33909-1-kuniyu@amazon.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.49.0 In-Reply-To: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-ClientProxiedBy: EX19D031UWA004.ant.amazon.com (10.13.139.19) To EX19D004ANA001.ant.amazon.com (10.37.240.138) From: Jann Horn Date: Mon, 5 May 2025 21:55:06 +0200 > On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 9:45 PM Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote: > > and LSM can check if the source socket is a kernel socket too. > > ("a kernel socket" is not necessarily the same as "a kernel socket > intended for core dumping") Yes, but why we need to care about it :) It doesn't happen or it's out-of-tree driver that is out-of-control for us but should be in-control on the host where the service is running.