netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
To: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc: "Eduard Zingerman" <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	"Song Liu" <song@kernel.org>,
	"Yonghong Song" <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	"KP Singh" <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	"Stanislav Fomichev" <sdf@fomichev.me>,
	"Hao Luo" <haoluo@google.com>, "Jiri Olsa" <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	"Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>,
	"Günther Noack" <gnoack@google.com>,
	"Paul Moore" <paul@paul-moore.com>,
	"James Morris" <jmorris@namei.org>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
	"Stephen Smalley" <stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com>,
	"Ondrej Mosnacek" <omosnace@redhat.com>,
	"Casey Schaufler" <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
	"Christian Brauner" <brauner@kernel.org>,
	"Kuniyuki Iwashima" <kuniyu@amazon.com>,
	"Kuniyuki Iwashima" <kuni1840@gmail.com>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v1 bpf-next 2/5] af_unix: Pass skb to security_unix_may_send().
Date: Mon, 5 May 2025 14:56:47 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250505215802.48449-3-kuniyu@amazon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250505215802.48449-1-kuniyu@amazon.com>

As long as recvmsg() or recvmmsg() is used with cmsg, it is not
possible to avoid receiving file descriptors via SCM_RIGHTS.

This behaviour has occasionally been flagged as problematic.

For instance, as noted on the uAPI Group page [0], an untrusted peer
could send a file descriptor pointing to a hung NFS mount and then
close it.  Once the receiver calls recvmsg() with msg_control, the
descriptor is automatically installed, and then the responsibility
for the final close() now falls on the receiver, which may result
in blocking the process for a long time.

Let's pass the skb to security_unix_may_send() so that BPF LSM can
inspect it and selectively prevent such a sendmsg().

Note that only the LSM_HOOK() macro uses the __nullable suffix for
skb to inform the verifier that the skb could be NULL at connect().
Without it, I was able to load a bpf prog without NULL check
against skb.

Sample:

SEC("lsm/unix_may_send")
int BPF_PROG(unix_refuse_scm_rights,
	     struct socket *sock, struct socket *other, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
	struct unix_skb_parms *cb;

	if (!skb)
		return 0;

	cb = (struct unix_skb_parms *)skb->cb;
	if (!cb->fp)
		return 0;

	return -EPERM;
}

Link: https://uapi-group.org/kernel-features/#disabling-reception-of-scm_rights-for-af_unix-sockets #[0]
Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
---
I guess there is no generic version of raw_tp_null_args[] ?
---
 include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h | 3 ++-
 include/linux/security.h      | 5 +++--
 net/unix/af_unix.c            | 8 ++++----
 security/landlock/task.c      | 3 ++-
 security/security.c           | 5 +++--
 security/selinux/hooks.c      | 3 ++-
 security/smack/smack_lsm.c    | 3 ++-
 7 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h b/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h
index bf3bbac4e02a..762c7f2f7dee 100644
--- a/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h
+++ b/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h
@@ -318,7 +318,8 @@ LSM_HOOK(int, 0, watch_key, struct key *key)
 #ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK
 LSM_HOOK(int, 0, unix_stream_connect, struct sock *sock, struct sock *other,
 	 struct sock *newsk)
-LSM_HOOK(int, 0, unix_may_send, struct socket *sock, struct socket *other)
+LSM_HOOK(int, 0, unix_may_send, struct socket *sock, struct socket *other,
+	 struct sk_buff *skb__nullable)
 LSM_HOOK(int, 0, socket_create, int family, int type, int protocol, int kern)
 LSM_HOOK(int, 0, socket_post_create, struct socket *sock, int family, int type,
 	 int protocol, int kern)
diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h
index cc9b54d95d22..5de77accee80 100644
--- a/include/linux/security.h
+++ b/include/linux/security.h
@@ -1630,7 +1630,7 @@ static inline int security_watch_key(struct key *key)
 #ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK
 
 int security_unix_stream_connect(struct sock *sock, struct sock *other, struct sock *newsk);
-int security_unix_may_send(struct socket *sock,  struct socket *other);
+int security_unix_may_send(struct socket *sock,  struct socket *other, struct sk_buff *skb);
 int security_socket_create(int family, int type, int protocol, int kern);
 int security_socket_post_create(struct socket *sock, int family,
 				int type, int protocol, int kern);
@@ -1692,7 +1692,8 @@ static inline int security_unix_stream_connect(struct sock *sock,
 }
 
 static inline int security_unix_may_send(struct socket *sock,
-					 struct socket *other)
+					 struct socket *other,
+					 struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c
index 769db3f8f41b..692cce579c89 100644
--- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
+++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
@@ -1447,7 +1447,7 @@ static int unix_dgram_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *addr,
 		if (!unix_may_send(sk, other))
 			goto out_unlock;
 
-		err = security_unix_may_send(sk->sk_socket, other->sk_socket);
+		err = security_unix_may_send(sk->sk_socket, other->sk_socket, NULL);
 		if (err)
 			goto out_unlock;
 
@@ -2101,7 +2101,7 @@ static int unix_dgram_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
 		goto out_unlock;
 	}
 
-	err = security_unix_may_send(sk->sk_socket, other->sk_socket);
+	err = security_unix_may_send(sk->sk_socket, other->sk_socket, skb);
 	if (err)
 		goto out_unlock;
 
@@ -2204,7 +2204,7 @@ static int queue_oob(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, struct sock *other
 	}
 
 	if (!fds_sent) {
-		err = security_unix_may_send(sock, other->sk_socket);
+		err = security_unix_may_send(sock, other->sk_socket, skb);
 		if (err)
 			goto out_unlock;
 	}
@@ -2326,7 +2326,7 @@ static int unix_stream_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
 			goto out_pipe_unlock;
 
 		if (!fds_sent) {
-			err = security_unix_may_send(sock, other->sk_socket);
+			err = security_unix_may_send(sock, other->sk_socket, skb);
 			if (err) {
 				unix_state_unlock(other);
 				goto out_free;
diff --git a/security/landlock/task.c b/security/landlock/task.c
index f15e6b0c56f8..aeb712d3fa8f 100644
--- a/security/landlock/task.c
+++ b/security/landlock/task.c
@@ -295,7 +295,8 @@ static int hook_unix_stream_connect(struct sock *const sock,
 }
 
 static int hook_unix_may_send(struct socket *const sock,
-			      struct socket *const other)
+			      struct socket *const other,
+			      struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
 	size_t handle_layer;
 	const struct landlock_cred_security *const subject =
diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
index fb57e8fddd91..875dbc7ba34f 100644
--- a/security/security.c
+++ b/security/security.c
@@ -4531,9 +4531,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_unix_stream_connect);
  *
  * Return: Returns 0 if permission is granted.
  */
-int security_unix_may_send(struct socket *sock,  struct socket *other)
+int security_unix_may_send(struct socket *sock,  struct socket *other,
+			   struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
-	return call_int_hook(unix_may_send, sock, other);
+	return call_int_hook(unix_may_send, sock, other, skb);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_unix_may_send);
 
diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c
index 9fb4cd442ffd..fcf14fb76e7f 100644
--- a/security/selinux/hooks.c
+++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c
@@ -5099,7 +5099,8 @@ static int selinux_socket_unix_stream_connect(struct sock *sock,
 }
 
 static int selinux_socket_unix_may_send(struct socket *sock,
-					struct socket *other)
+					struct socket *other,
+					struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
 	struct sk_security_struct *ssec = selinux_sock(sock->sk);
 	struct sk_security_struct *osec = selinux_sock(other->sk);
diff --git a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
index 00aa1e7513c1..33827f4c5c76 100644
--- a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
+++ b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
@@ -3890,7 +3890,8 @@ static int smack_unix_stream_connect(struct sock *sock,
  * Return 0 if a subject with the smack of sock could access
  * an object with the smack of other, otherwise an error code
  */
-static int smack_unix_may_send(struct socket *sock, struct socket *other)
+static int smack_unix_may_send(struct socket *sock, struct socket *other,
+			       struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
 	struct socket_smack *ssp = smack_sock(sock->sk);
 	struct socket_smack *osp = smack_sock(other->sk);
-- 
2.49.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-05-05 21:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-05 21:56 [PATCH v1 bpf-next 0/5] af_unix: Allow BPF LSM to scrub SCM_RIGHTS at sendmsg() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-05-05 21:56 ` [PATCH v1 bpf-next 1/5] af_unix: Call security_unix_may_send() in sendmsg() for all socket types Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-05-05 21:56 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima [this message]
2025-05-05 21:56 ` [PATCH v1 bpf-next 3/5] af_unix: Remove redundant scm->fp check in __scm_destroy() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-05-09 14:13   ` kernel test robot
2025-05-05 21:56 ` [PATCH v1 bpf-next 4/5] bpf: Add kfunc to scrub SCM_RIGHTS at security_unix_may_send() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-05-06  0:13   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-06  8:25     ` Mickaël Salaün
2025-05-09 15:06   ` kernel test robot
2025-05-05 21:56 ` [PATCH v1 bpf-next 5/5] selftest: bpf: Add test for bpf_unix_scrub_fds() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-05-05 22:49 ` [PATCH v1 bpf-next 0/5] af_unix: Allow BPF LSM to scrub SCM_RIGHTS at sendmsg() Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-05-06  0:21   ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-05-06 16:25     ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-05-06 18:16       ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-05-06  9:15   ` Christian Brauner
2025-05-06 16:08     ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-05-06 18:14       ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-05-05 23:21 ` Paul Moore
2025-05-06  0:35   ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-05-06 14:57     ` Paul Moore
2025-05-06 12:17 ` Lennart Poettering
2025-05-06 18:19   ` Kuniyuki Iwashima

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250505215802.48449-3-kuniyu@amazon.com \
    --to=kuniyu@amazon.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=gnoack@google.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuni1840@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=mic@digikod.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=omosnace@redhat.com \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).