From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: 'Alexei Starovoitov ' <ast@kernel.org>,
'Andrii Nakryiko ' <andrii@kernel.org>,
'Daniel Borkmann ' <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
'Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi ' <memxor@gmail.com>,
'Amery Hung ' <ameryhung@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 8/8] selftests/bpf: Add test for bpf_list_{front,back}
Date: Mon, 5 May 2025 18:58:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250506015857.817950-9-martin.lau@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250506015857.817950-1-martin.lau@linux.dev>
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
This patch adds the "list_peek" test to use the new
bpf_list_{front,back} kfunc.
The test_{front,back}* tests ensure that the return value
is a non_own_ref node pointer and requires the spinlock to be held.
Suggested-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> # check non_own_ref marking
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/linked_list.c | 6 +
.../selftests/bpf/progs/linked_list_peek.c | 113 ++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 119 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/linked_list_peek.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/linked_list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/linked_list.c
index 77d07e0a4a55..5266c7022863 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/linked_list.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/linked_list.c
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
#include "linked_list.skel.h"
#include "linked_list_fail.skel.h"
+#include "linked_list_peek.skel.h"
static char log_buf[1024 * 1024];
@@ -805,3 +806,8 @@ void test_linked_list(void)
test_linked_list_success(LIST_IN_LIST, true);
test_linked_list_success(TEST_ALL, false);
}
+
+void test_linked_list_peek(void)
+{
+ RUN_TESTS(linked_list_peek);
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/linked_list_peek.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/linked_list_peek.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..264e81bfb287
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/linked_list_peek.c
@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2025 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */
+
+#include <vmlinux.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+#include "bpf_experimental.h"
+
+struct node_data {
+ struct bpf_list_node l;
+ int key;
+};
+
+#define private(name) SEC(".data." #name) __hidden __attribute__((aligned(8)))
+private(A) struct bpf_spin_lock glock;
+private(A) struct bpf_list_head ghead __contains(node_data, l);
+
+#define list_entry(ptr, type, member) container_of(ptr, type, member)
+#define NR_NODES 16
+
+int zero = 0;
+
+SEC("syscall")
+__retval(0)
+long list_peek(void *ctx)
+{
+ struct bpf_list_node *l_n;
+ struct node_data *n;
+ int i, err = 0;
+
+ bpf_spin_lock(&glock);
+ l_n = bpf_list_front(&ghead);
+ bpf_spin_unlock(&glock);
+ if (l_n)
+ return __LINE__;
+
+ bpf_spin_lock(&glock);
+ l_n = bpf_list_back(&ghead);
+ bpf_spin_unlock(&glock);
+ if (l_n)
+ return __LINE__;
+
+ for (i = zero; i < NR_NODES && can_loop; i++) {
+ n = bpf_obj_new(typeof(*n));
+ if (!n)
+ return __LINE__;
+ n->key = i;
+ bpf_spin_lock(&glock);
+ bpf_list_push_back(&ghead, &n->l);
+ bpf_spin_unlock(&glock);
+ }
+
+ bpf_spin_lock(&glock);
+
+ l_n = bpf_list_front(&ghead);
+ if (!l_n) {
+ err = __LINE__;
+ goto done;
+ }
+
+ n = list_entry(l_n, struct node_data, l);
+ if (n->key != 0) {
+ err = __LINE__;
+ goto done;
+ }
+
+ l_n = bpf_list_back(&ghead);
+ if (!l_n) {
+ err = __LINE__;
+ goto done;
+ }
+
+ n = list_entry(l_n, struct node_data, l);
+ if (n->key != NR_NODES - 1) {
+ err = __LINE__;
+ goto done;
+ }
+
+done:
+ bpf_spin_unlock(&glock);
+ return err;
+}
+
+#define TEST_FB(op, dolock) \
+SEC("syscall") \
+__failure __msg(MSG) \
+long test_##op##_spinlock_##dolock(void *ctx) \
+{ \
+ struct bpf_list_node *l_n; \
+ __u64 jiffies = 0; \
+ \
+ if (dolock) \
+ bpf_spin_lock(&glock); \
+ l_n = bpf_list_##op(&ghead); \
+ if (l_n) \
+ jiffies = bpf_jiffies64(); \
+ if (dolock) \
+ bpf_spin_unlock(&glock); \
+ \
+ return !!jiffies; \
+}
+
+#define MSG "call bpf_list_{{(front|back).+}}; R0{{(_w)?}}=ptr_or_null_node_data(id={{[0-9]+}},non_own_ref"
+TEST_FB(front, true)
+TEST_FB(back, true)
+#undef MSG
+
+#define MSG "bpf_spin_lock at off=0 must be held for bpf_list_head"
+TEST_FB(front, false)
+TEST_FB(back, false)
+#undef MSG
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
--
2.47.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-06 1:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-06 1:58 [PATCH v2 bpf-next 0/8] bpf: Support bpf rbtree traversal and list peeking Martin KaFai Lau
2025-05-06 1:58 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 1/8] bpf: Check KF_bpf_rbtree_add_impl for the "case KF_ARG_PTR_TO_RB_NODE" Martin KaFai Lau
2025-05-06 1:58 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 2/8] bpf: Simplify reg0 marking for the rbtree kfuncs that return a bpf_rb_node pointer Martin KaFai Lau
2025-05-06 1:58 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 3/8] bpf: Add bpf_rbtree_{root,left,right} kfunc Martin KaFai Lau
2025-05-06 1:58 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 4/8] bpf: Allow refcounted bpf_rb_node used in bpf_rbtree_{remove,left,right} Martin KaFai Lau
2025-05-06 1:58 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 5/8] selftests/bpf: Add tests for bpf_rbtree_{root,left,right} Martin KaFai Lau
2025-05-06 1:58 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 6/8] bpf: Simplify reg0 marking for the list kfuncs that return a bpf_list_node pointer Martin KaFai Lau
2025-05-06 1:58 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 7/8] bpf: Add bpf_list_{front,back} kfunc Martin KaFai Lau
2025-05-06 1:58 ` Martin KaFai Lau [this message]
2025-05-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 0/8] bpf: Support bpf rbtree traversal and list peeking patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250506015857.817950-9-martin.lau@linux.dev \
--to=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=ameryhung@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).