From: Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@linux.dev>
To: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] net: sysfs: Implement is_visible for phys_(port_id, port_name, switch_id)
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 21:02:05 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250515130205.3274-1-yajun.deng@linux.dev> (raw)
phys_port_id_show, phys_port_name_show and phys_switch_id_show would
return -EOPNOTSUPP if the netdev didn't implement the corresponding
method.
There is no point in creating these files if they are unsupported.
Put these attributes in netdev_phys_group and implement the is_visible
method. make phys_(port_id, port_name, switch_id) invisible if the netdev
dosen't implement the corresponding method.
Signed-off-by: Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@linux.dev>
---
include/linux/netdevice.h | 2 +-
net/core/net-sysfs.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
index 32a1e41636a9..efbcc4836498 100644
--- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
+++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
@@ -2384,7 +2384,7 @@ struct net_device {
struct dm_hw_stat_delta __rcu *dm_private;
#endif
struct device dev;
- const struct attribute_group *sysfs_groups[4];
+ const struct attribute_group *sysfs_groups[5];
const struct attribute_group *sysfs_rx_queue_group;
const struct rtnl_link_ops *rtnl_link_ops;
diff --git a/net/core/net-sysfs.c b/net/core/net-sysfs.c
index 1ace0cd01adc..f176b7808abe 100644
--- a/net/core/net-sysfs.c
+++ b/net/core/net-sysfs.c
@@ -641,12 +641,6 @@ static ssize_t phys_port_id_show(struct device *dev,
struct netdev_phys_item_id ppid;
ssize_t ret;
- /* The check is also done in dev_get_phys_port_id; this helps returning
- * early without hitting the locking section below.
- */
- if (!netdev->netdev_ops->ndo_get_phys_port_id)
- return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-
ret = sysfs_rtnl_lock(&dev->kobj, &attr->attr, netdev);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -659,7 +653,8 @@ static ssize_t phys_port_id_show(struct device *dev,
return ret;
}
-static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(phys_port_id);
+static struct device_attribute dev_attr_phys_port_id =
+ __ATTR(phys_port_id, 0444, phys_port_id_show, NULL);
static ssize_t phys_port_name_show(struct device *dev,
struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
@@ -668,13 +663,6 @@ static ssize_t phys_port_name_show(struct device *dev,
char name[IFNAMSIZ];
ssize_t ret;
- /* The checks are also done in dev_get_phys_port_name; this helps
- * returning early without hitting the locking section below.
- */
- if (!netdev->netdev_ops->ndo_get_phys_port_name &&
- !netdev->devlink_port)
- return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-
ret = sysfs_rtnl_lock(&dev->kobj, &attr->attr, netdev);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -687,7 +675,8 @@ static ssize_t phys_port_name_show(struct device *dev,
return ret;
}
-static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(phys_port_name);
+static struct device_attribute dev_attr_phys_port_name =
+ __ATTR(phys_port_name, 0444, phys_port_name_show, NULL);
static ssize_t phys_switch_id_show(struct device *dev,
struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
@@ -696,14 +685,6 @@ static ssize_t phys_switch_id_show(struct device *dev,
struct netdev_phys_item_id ppid = { };
ssize_t ret;
- /* The checks are also done in dev_get_phys_port_name; this helps
- * returning early without hitting the locking section below. This works
- * because recurse is false when calling dev_get_port_parent_id.
- */
- if (!netdev->netdev_ops->ndo_get_port_parent_id &&
- !netdev->devlink_port)
- return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-
ret = sysfs_rtnl_lock(&dev->kobj, &attr->attr, netdev);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -716,7 +697,52 @@ static ssize_t phys_switch_id_show(struct device *dev,
return ret;
}
-static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(phys_switch_id);
+static struct device_attribute dev_attr_phys_switch_id =
+ __ATTR(phys_switch_id, 0444, phys_switch_id_show, NULL);
+
+static struct attribute *netdev_phys_attrs[] __ro_after_init = {
+ &dev_attr_phys_port_id.attr,
+ &dev_attr_phys_port_name.attr,
+ &dev_attr_phys_switch_id.attr,
+ NULL,
+};
+
+static umode_t netdev_phys_is_visible(struct kobject *kobj,
+ struct attribute *attr, int index)
+{
+ struct device *dev = kobj_to_dev(kobj);
+ struct net_device *netdev = to_net_dev(dev);
+
+ if (attr == &dev_attr_phys_port_id.attr) {
+ /* The check is also done in dev_get_phys_port_id; this helps returning
+ * early without hitting the locking section below.
+ */
+ if (!netdev->netdev_ops->ndo_get_phys_port_id)
+ return 0;
+ } else if (attr == &dev_attr_phys_port_name.attr) {
+ /* The checks are also done in dev_get_phys_port_name; this helps
+ * returning early without hitting the locking section below.
+ */
+ if (!netdev->netdev_ops->ndo_get_phys_port_name &&
+ !netdev->devlink_port)
+ return 0;
+ } else if (attr == &dev_attr_phys_switch_id.attr) {
+ /* The checks are also done in dev_get_phys_port_name; this helps
+ * returning early without hitting the locking section below. This works
+ * because recurse is false when calling dev_get_port_parent_id.
+ */
+ if (!netdev->netdev_ops->ndo_get_port_parent_id &&
+ !netdev->devlink_port)
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ return attr->mode;
+}
+
+static struct attribute_group netdev_phys_group = {
+ .attrs = netdev_phys_attrs,
+ .is_visible = netdev_phys_is_visible,
+};
static ssize_t threaded_show(struct device *dev,
struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
@@ -783,9 +809,6 @@ static struct attribute *net_class_attrs[] __ro_after_init = {
&dev_attr_tx_queue_len.attr,
&dev_attr_gro_flush_timeout.attr,
&dev_attr_napi_defer_hard_irqs.attr,
- &dev_attr_phys_port_id.attr,
- &dev_attr_phys_port_name.attr,
- &dev_attr_phys_switch_id.attr,
&dev_attr_proto_down.attr,
&dev_attr_carrier_up_count.attr,
&dev_attr_carrier_down_count.attr,
@@ -2328,6 +2351,7 @@ int netdev_register_kobject(struct net_device *ndev)
groups++;
*groups++ = &netstat_group;
+ *groups++ = &netdev_phys_group;
if (wireless_group_needed(ndev))
*groups++ = &wireless_group;
--
2.25.1
next reply other threads:[~2025-05-15 13:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-15 13:02 Yajun Deng [this message]
2025-05-16 22:26 ` [PATCH net-next] net: sysfs: Implement is_visible for phys_(port_id, port_name, switch_id) Jakub Kicinski
2025-05-17 2:24 ` Yajun Deng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250515130205.3274-1-yajun.deng@linux.dev \
--to=yajun.deng@linux.dev \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).