From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3FE41F956; Fri, 16 May 2025 20:21:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747426913; cv=none; b=sqh1bydgbvAburS+7nt0y0RuDpk6Ry9O3FH/axl0rnfX5Yswq/Eh9J9vrohxAEhKkEn3m9dUjCgeyato4crGr+BTpqMjiC0xVpfWSfcJrwyFWNtXhtuVwBjhG7yc1evSjKXaN2UJrklGj8b1rspnB2n3Evrhth7qi4Q5Qd0MLpI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747426913; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0eZbYvSMOyz0txO7McOUt7WBCXP3fLg51sadhpP/XeE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=C/V7DJgWMopi/Zxw4b9DDfgD5hGMnFf5OTHxM/cpqL1TpgddvTSAgKOnmKcHzTAYDUoStOvTjEnEsp3BIdMilKlYtG5DW16lAMlA6DGCbORuaSqLHeyxYY1jKTpVOUImX1Hn4h4xfrBk8GRfi+g5PgcGdyvWMxoFGXjevP58sys= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=mff0oXGC; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="mff0oXGC" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 24984C4CEE4; Fri, 16 May 2025 20:21:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1747426913; bh=0eZbYvSMOyz0txO7McOUt7WBCXP3fLg51sadhpP/XeE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=mff0oXGCBELo0hzgvl1WaEJjdXKZ7PB2yucYnPxgvfRfJtsyfndb2MF2nqpMWRNd6 6QSwslLlHkotLfTgLKNJDZHKas5G61PIZ/7a43kJkNtGjgaIc8kTZS7vUdaNF6VwlI 4HEg/c7NAuCUCMiawrmi2SVkxEVnd8Tkok6WC8ytZqBAw3HWVws7GIwYuklMxNJe2D RbBYKJALQSY4+ByUVtcQNY+Os6YPOLpagZk37B529LWkEru4lU5HBNRiNL+5zJEkcd e6OVlAMc47gBuo8m5D+6j5sVAzDeDPn1nm1dvDPlhVPLU/RZXeGoh1YtJZ+wGyAX+0 HSJbIwqpTSQvQ== Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 21:21:49 +0100 From: Simon Horman To: Christophe JAILLET Cc: Lorenzo Bianconi , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] net: airoha: Fix an error handling path in airoha_alloc_gdm_port() Message-ID: <20250516202149.GL3339421@horms.kernel.org> References: <5c94b9b345017f29ed653e2f05d25620d128c3f0.1746715755.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> <20250516201606.GH3339421@horms.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250516201606.GH3339421@horms.kernel.org> On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 09:16:13PM +0100, Simon Horman wrote: > On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 09:59:35PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > > If register_netdev() fails, the error handling path of the probe will not > > free the memory allocated by the previous airoha_metadata_dst_alloc() call > > because port->dev->reg_state will not be NETREG_REGISTERED. > > > > So, an explicit airoha_metadata_dst_free() call is needed in this case to > > avoid a memory leak. > > > > Fixes: af3cf757d5c9 ("net: airoha: Move DSA tag in DMA descriptor") > > Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET > > --- > > Changes in v3: > > - None > > > > Changes in v2: > > - New patch > > v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/5c94b9b3850f7f29ed653e2205325620df28c3ff.1746715755.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr/ > > > > Compile tested only. > > Reviewed-by: Simon Horman Sorry, I was a little too hasty. This patch looks good to me, but as this is a fix for change present in net it should be targeted at net. Subject: [PATCH v4 net] ... And it should be split out from the patchset comprising the remaining patches in this series, which appear to be clean-ups (or at least not but fixes). This rump patch-set should be targeted at net-next. And ideally, IMHO, have a cover letter. Subject: [PATCH v4 net-next 0/3] ... Thanks! -- pw-bot: changes-requested