From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5026B25229C; Tue, 20 May 2025 15:18:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747754311; cv=none; b=Vbt9yVQYIg/trOmt9P36y+W3mLnAJqin1NDSnogCxd2AgIgqXNmbHenrSydaboVPpbOcA2sW4WWEyGfwIPTLCtf0B03nUwbJn9l2Vi8cSxe1mO0Uz2SAxwPTNlxUmeS1Jop9NwwRp4ac38ppjla6q6kybI5hVdf9yl2k+tMaLxc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747754311; c=relaxed/simple; bh=gOcAH/YL5VciW2jCfOJM+RDZl3zKyoeTRxoKCucXQKc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=oNmkEERJHOsT0jVLXqV6syU2YG7UI19X5CVFnJpIomX9/PuNl8AGpn81o0b/x9XxDuHwzaZfjouNbhPcDIZfY4hYjDvOZR2YtQyvKLI0lpgpfAyi3QBJ2g1ZAUVKrLXIyKhc9MCWaW8eI7exBoGHgHKrFnbEdeuuI2ZXS26nCh4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=WIkvmAtt; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="WIkvmAtt" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7A749C4CEEA; Tue, 20 May 2025 15:18:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1747754310; bh=gOcAH/YL5VciW2jCfOJM+RDZl3zKyoeTRxoKCucXQKc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=WIkvmAtt5TOeMvCDGBbPJgB4JjBBPqqSvNUUZs5g4513rRX5RxJkhlFPLNQkiiSyC kEEBnlMGbFy/UU2efYx4TS3uT1GkmLUB264f5DqVEAa1qu5AO0ZRlBcHoeOMvtBA6A dlCY/nTm3or20KEx0j9YfHik5x+PVGGk4VLjiEfUS3XV41Kx+8Mm28DQSJyEUF+vYJ OZB17ZWCrXlQ1JSY2UVx+PS5QsvjVLI4un1blQBMuTIzblz8vEuUEAWl+bbvgzxDeR +cE1X4cBIWWYk68/zYN0cY9FKSUESNiQcbeSYO/YpWyDDzCytghiSikW029Z+g86CS Ha7+ngUMOWpVw== Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 08:18:17 -0700 From: Eric Biggers To: Leon Romanovsky Cc: Bernard Metzler , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Daniel Borkmann , Marcelo Ricardo Leitner , Sagi Grimberg , Ard Biesheuvel Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 04/10] RDMA/siw: use skb_crc32c() instead of __skb_checksum() Message-ID: <20250520151817.GA1249@sol> References: <20250511004110.145171-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> <20250511004110.145171-5-ebiggers@kernel.org> <20250520131841.GH7435@unreal> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250520131841.GH7435@unreal> On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 04:18:41PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 09:04:04AM +0000, Bernard Metzler wrote: > > > > <...> > > > > > > > > Thanks Eric! > > Works fine. Correct checksum tested against siw and cxgb4 peers. > > > > Reviewed-by: Bernard Metzler > > This patch should go through RDMA repository, Please resend it. > > Thanks It depends on patches 1-2, and patches 6-7 depend on this one. So your proposal would require that we drag this out over 3 cycles (patches 1-3,5,8-10 in net in 6.16, patch 4 in RDMA in 6.17, patches 6-7 in net in 6.18). Can we please just take the whole series through net in 6.16? There aren't any conflicts. - Eric