From: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
To: lee@kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
Michal Luczaj <mhal@rbox.co>, Rao Shoaib <Rao.Shoaib@oracle.com>,
Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v6.6 16/26] af_unix: Skip GC if no cycle exists.
Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 14:45:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250521144803.2050504-17-lee@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250521144803.2050504-1-lee@kernel.org>
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
[ Upstream commit 77e5593aebba823bcbcf2c4b58b07efcd63933b8 ]
We do not need to run GC if there is no possible cyclic reference.
We use unix_graph_maybe_cyclic to decide if we should run GC.
If a fd of an AF_UNIX socket is passed to an already inflight AF_UNIX
socket, they could form a cyclic reference. Then, we set true to
unix_graph_maybe_cyclic and later run Tarjan's algorithm to group
them into SCC.
Once we run Tarjan's algorithm, we are 100% sure whether cyclic
references exist or not. If there is no cycle, we set false to
unix_graph_maybe_cyclic and can skip the entire garbage collection
next time.
When finalising SCC, we set true to unix_graph_maybe_cyclic if SCC
consists of multiple vertices.
Even if SCC is a single vertex, a cycle might exist as self-fd passing.
Given the corner case is rare, we detect it by checking all edges of
the vertex and set true to unix_graph_maybe_cyclic.
With this change, __unix_gc() is just a spin_lock() dance in the normal
usage.
Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
Acked-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240325202425.60930-11-kuniyu@amazon.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
(cherry picked from commit 77e5593aebba823bcbcf2c4b58b07efcd63933b8)
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
---
net/unix/garbage.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/unix/garbage.c b/net/unix/garbage.c
index feae6c17b2911..8f0dc39bb72fc 100644
--- a/net/unix/garbage.c
+++ b/net/unix/garbage.c
@@ -112,6 +112,19 @@ static struct unix_vertex *unix_edge_successor(struct unix_edge *edge)
return edge->successor->vertex;
}
+static bool unix_graph_maybe_cyclic;
+
+static void unix_update_graph(struct unix_vertex *vertex)
+{
+ /* If the receiver socket is not inflight, no cyclic
+ * reference could be formed.
+ */
+ if (!vertex)
+ return;
+
+ unix_graph_maybe_cyclic = true;
+}
+
static LIST_HEAD(unix_unvisited_vertices);
enum unix_vertex_index {
@@ -138,12 +151,16 @@ static void unix_add_edge(struct scm_fp_list *fpl, struct unix_edge *edge)
vertex->out_degree++;
list_add_tail(&edge->vertex_entry, &vertex->edges);
+
+ unix_update_graph(unix_edge_successor(edge));
}
static void unix_del_edge(struct scm_fp_list *fpl, struct unix_edge *edge)
{
struct unix_vertex *vertex = edge->predecessor->vertex;
+ unix_update_graph(unix_edge_successor(edge));
+
list_del(&edge->vertex_entry);
vertex->out_degree--;
@@ -227,6 +244,7 @@ void unix_del_edges(struct scm_fp_list *fpl)
void unix_update_edges(struct unix_sock *receiver)
{
spin_lock(&unix_gc_lock);
+ unix_update_graph(unix_sk(receiver->listener)->vertex);
receiver->listener = NULL;
spin_unlock(&unix_gc_lock);
}
@@ -268,6 +286,26 @@ void unix_destroy_fpl(struct scm_fp_list *fpl)
unix_free_vertices(fpl);
}
+static bool unix_scc_cyclic(struct list_head *scc)
+{
+ struct unix_vertex *vertex;
+ struct unix_edge *edge;
+
+ /* SCC containing multiple vertices ? */
+ if (!list_is_singular(scc))
+ return true;
+
+ vertex = list_first_entry(scc, typeof(*vertex), scc_entry);
+
+ /* Self-reference or a embryo-listener circle ? */
+ list_for_each_entry(edge, &vertex->edges, vertex_entry) {
+ if (unix_edge_successor(edge) == vertex)
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ return false;
+}
+
static LIST_HEAD(unix_visited_vertices);
static unsigned long unix_vertex_grouped_index = UNIX_VERTEX_INDEX_MARK2;
@@ -353,6 +391,9 @@ static void __unix_walk_scc(struct unix_vertex *vertex)
vertex->index = unix_vertex_grouped_index;
}
+ if (!unix_graph_maybe_cyclic)
+ unix_graph_maybe_cyclic = unix_scc_cyclic(&scc);
+
list_del(&scc);
}
@@ -363,6 +404,8 @@ static void __unix_walk_scc(struct unix_vertex *vertex)
static void unix_walk_scc(void)
{
+ unix_graph_maybe_cyclic = false;
+
/* Visit every vertex exactly once.
* __unix_walk_scc() moves visited vertices to unix_visited_vertices.
*/
@@ -524,6 +567,9 @@ static void __unix_gc(struct work_struct *work)
spin_lock(&unix_gc_lock);
+ if (!unix_graph_maybe_cyclic)
+ goto skip_gc;
+
unix_walk_scc();
/* First, select candidates for garbage collection. Only
@@ -633,7 +679,7 @@ static void __unix_gc(struct work_struct *work)
/* All candidates should have been detached by now. */
WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&gc_candidates));
-
+skip_gc:
/* Paired with READ_ONCE() in wait_for_unix_gc(). */
WRITE_ONCE(gc_in_progress, false);
--
2.49.0.1112.g889b7c5bd8-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-21 14:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-21 14:45 [PATCH v6.6 00/26] af_unix: Align with upstream to avoid a potential UAF Lee Jones
2025-05-21 14:45 ` [PATCH v6.6 01/26] af_unix: Return struct unix_sock from unix_get_socket() Lee Jones
2025-05-21 14:45 ` [PATCH v6.6 02/26] af_unix: Run GC on only one CPU Lee Jones
2025-05-21 14:45 ` [PATCH v6.6 03/26] af_unix: Try to run GC async Lee Jones
2025-05-21 14:45 ` [PATCH v6.6 04/26] af_unix: Replace BUG_ON() with WARN_ON_ONCE() Lee Jones
2025-05-21 14:45 ` [PATCH v6.6 05/26] af_unix: Remove io_uring code for GC Lee Jones
2025-05-21 14:45 ` [PATCH v6.6 06/26] af_unix: Remove CONFIG_UNIX_SCM Lee Jones
2025-05-21 14:45 ` [PATCH v6.6 07/26] af_unix: Allocate struct unix_vertex for each inflight AF_UNIX fd Lee Jones
2025-05-21 14:45 ` [PATCH v6.6 08/26] af_unix: Allocate struct unix_edge " Lee Jones
2025-05-21 14:45 ` [PATCH v6.6 09/26] af_unix: Link struct unix_edge when queuing skb Lee Jones
2025-05-21 14:45 ` [PATCH v6.6 10/26] af_unix: Bulk update unix_tot_inflight/unix_inflight " Lee Jones
2025-05-21 14:45 ` [PATCH v6.6 11/26] af_unix: Iterate all vertices by DFS Lee Jones
2025-05-21 14:45 ` [PATCH v6.6 12/26] af_unix: Detect Strongly Connected Components Lee Jones
2025-05-21 14:45 ` [PATCH v6.6 13/26] af_unix: Save listener for embryo socket Lee Jones
2025-05-21 14:45 ` [PATCH v6.6 14/26] af_unix: Fix up unix_edge.successor " Lee Jones
2025-05-21 14:45 ` [PATCH v6.6 15/26] af_unix: Save O(n) setup of Tarjan's algo Lee Jones
2025-05-21 14:45 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2025-05-21 14:45 ` [PATCH v6.6 17/26] af_unix: Avoid Tarjan's algorithm if unnecessary Lee Jones
2025-05-21 14:45 ` [PATCH v6.6 18/26] af_unix: Assign a unique index to SCC Lee Jones
2025-05-21 14:45 ` [PATCH v6.6 19/26] af_unix: Detect dead SCC Lee Jones
2025-05-21 14:45 ` [PATCH v6.6 20/26] af_unix: Replace garbage collection algorithm Lee Jones
2025-05-21 14:45 ` [PATCH v6.6 21/26] af_unix: Remove lock dance in unix_peek_fds() Lee Jones
2025-05-21 14:45 ` [PATCH v6.6 22/26] af_unix: Try not to hold unix_gc_lock during accept() Lee Jones
2025-05-21 14:45 ` [PATCH v6.6 23/26] af_unix: Don't access successor in unix_del_edges() during GC Lee Jones
2025-05-21 14:45 ` [PATCH v6.6 24/26] af_unix: Add dead flag to struct scm_fp_list Lee Jones
2025-05-21 14:45 ` [PATCH v6.6 25/26] af_unix: Fix garbage collection of embryos carrying OOB with SCM_RIGHTS Lee Jones
2025-05-21 14:45 ` [PATCH v6.6 26/26] af_unix: Fix uninit-value in __unix_walk_scc() Lee Jones
2025-05-29 12:26 ` [PATCH v6.6 00/26] af_unix: Align with upstream to avoid a potential UAF Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250521144803.2050504-17-lee@kernel.org \
--to=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=Rao.Shoaib@oracle.com \
--cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@amazon.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhal@rbox.co \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).