From: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
To: lee@kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
Michal Luczaj <mhal@rbox.co>, Rao Shoaib <Rao.Shoaib@oracle.com>,
Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v6.6 21/26] af_unix: Remove lock dance in unix_peek_fds().
Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 14:45:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250521144803.2050504-22-lee@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250521144803.2050504-1-lee@kernel.org>
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
[ Upstream commit 118f457da9ed58a79e24b73c2ef0aa1987241f0e ]
In the previous GC implementation, the shape of the inflight socket
graph was not expected to change while GC was in progress.
MSG_PEEK was tricky because it could install inflight fd silently
and transform the graph.
Let's say we peeked a fd, which was a listening socket, and accept()ed
some embryo sockets from it. The garbage collection algorithm would
have been confused because the set of sockets visited in scan_inflight()
would change within the same GC invocation.
That's why we placed spin_lock(&unix_gc_lock) and spin_unlock() in
unix_peek_fds() with a fat comment.
In the new GC implementation, we no longer garbage-collect the socket
if it exists in another queue, that is, if it has a bridge to another
SCC. Also, accept() will require the lock if it has edges.
Thus, we need not do the complicated lock dance.
Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240401173125.92184-3-kuniyu@amazon.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
(cherry picked from commit 118f457da9ed58a79e24b73c2ef0aa1987241f0e)
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
---
include/net/af_unix.h | 1 -
net/unix/af_unix.c | 42 ------------------------------------------
net/unix/garbage.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 44 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/af_unix.h b/include/net/af_unix.h
index d88ca51a9081d..47042de4a2a9c 100644
--- a/include/net/af_unix.h
+++ b/include/net/af_unix.h
@@ -17,7 +17,6 @@ static inline struct unix_sock *unix_get_socket(struct file *filp)
}
#endif
-extern spinlock_t unix_gc_lock;
extern unsigned int unix_tot_inflight;
void unix_add_edges(struct scm_fp_list *fpl, struct unix_sock *receiver);
void unix_del_edges(struct scm_fp_list *fpl);
diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c
index eee0bccd7877b..df70d8a7ee837 100644
--- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
+++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
@@ -1796,48 +1796,6 @@ static void unix_detach_fds(struct scm_cookie *scm, struct sk_buff *skb)
static void unix_peek_fds(struct scm_cookie *scm, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
scm->fp = scm_fp_dup(UNIXCB(skb).fp);
-
- /*
- * Garbage collection of unix sockets starts by selecting a set of
- * candidate sockets which have reference only from being in flight
- * (total_refs == inflight_refs). This condition is checked once during
- * the candidate collection phase, and candidates are marked as such, so
- * that non-candidates can later be ignored. While inflight_refs is
- * protected by unix_gc_lock, total_refs (file count) is not, hence this
- * is an instantaneous decision.
- *
- * Once a candidate, however, the socket must not be reinstalled into a
- * file descriptor while the garbage collection is in progress.
- *
- * If the above conditions are met, then the directed graph of
- * candidates (*) does not change while unix_gc_lock is held.
- *
- * Any operations that changes the file count through file descriptors
- * (dup, close, sendmsg) does not change the graph since candidates are
- * not installed in fds.
- *
- * Dequeing a candidate via recvmsg would install it into an fd, but
- * that takes unix_gc_lock to decrement the inflight count, so it's
- * serialized with garbage collection.
- *
- * MSG_PEEK is special in that it does not change the inflight count,
- * yet does install the socket into an fd. The following lock/unlock
- * pair is to ensure serialization with garbage collection. It must be
- * done between incrementing the file count and installing the file into
- * an fd.
- *
- * If garbage collection starts after the barrier provided by the
- * lock/unlock, then it will see the elevated refcount and not mark this
- * as a candidate. If a garbage collection is already in progress
- * before the file count was incremented, then the lock/unlock pair will
- * ensure that garbage collection is finished before progressing to
- * installing the fd.
- *
- * (*) A -> B where B is on the queue of A or B is on the queue of C
- * which is on the queue of listening socket A.
- */
- spin_lock(&unix_gc_lock);
- spin_unlock(&unix_gc_lock);
}
static void unix_destruct_scm(struct sk_buff *skb)
diff --git a/net/unix/garbage.c b/net/unix/garbage.c
index 89ea71d9297ba..12a4ec27e0d4d 100644
--- a/net/unix/garbage.c
+++ b/net/unix/garbage.c
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ static void unix_free_vertices(struct scm_fp_list *fpl)
}
}
-DEFINE_SPINLOCK(unix_gc_lock);
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(unix_gc_lock);
unsigned int unix_tot_inflight;
void unix_add_edges(struct scm_fp_list *fpl, struct unix_sock *receiver)
--
2.49.0.1112.g889b7c5bd8-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-21 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-21 14:45 [PATCH v6.6 00/26] af_unix: Align with upstream to avoid a potential UAF Lee Jones
2025-05-21 14:45 ` [PATCH v6.6 01/26] af_unix: Return struct unix_sock from unix_get_socket() Lee Jones
2025-05-21 14:45 ` [PATCH v6.6 02/26] af_unix: Run GC on only one CPU Lee Jones
2025-05-21 14:45 ` [PATCH v6.6 03/26] af_unix: Try to run GC async Lee Jones
2025-05-21 14:45 ` [PATCH v6.6 04/26] af_unix: Replace BUG_ON() with WARN_ON_ONCE() Lee Jones
2025-05-21 14:45 ` [PATCH v6.6 05/26] af_unix: Remove io_uring code for GC Lee Jones
2025-05-21 14:45 ` [PATCH v6.6 06/26] af_unix: Remove CONFIG_UNIX_SCM Lee Jones
2025-05-21 14:45 ` [PATCH v6.6 07/26] af_unix: Allocate struct unix_vertex for each inflight AF_UNIX fd Lee Jones
2025-05-21 14:45 ` [PATCH v6.6 08/26] af_unix: Allocate struct unix_edge " Lee Jones
2025-05-21 14:45 ` [PATCH v6.6 09/26] af_unix: Link struct unix_edge when queuing skb Lee Jones
2025-05-21 14:45 ` [PATCH v6.6 10/26] af_unix: Bulk update unix_tot_inflight/unix_inflight " Lee Jones
2025-05-21 14:45 ` [PATCH v6.6 11/26] af_unix: Iterate all vertices by DFS Lee Jones
2025-05-21 14:45 ` [PATCH v6.6 12/26] af_unix: Detect Strongly Connected Components Lee Jones
2025-05-21 14:45 ` [PATCH v6.6 13/26] af_unix: Save listener for embryo socket Lee Jones
2025-05-21 14:45 ` [PATCH v6.6 14/26] af_unix: Fix up unix_edge.successor " Lee Jones
2025-05-21 14:45 ` [PATCH v6.6 15/26] af_unix: Save O(n) setup of Tarjan's algo Lee Jones
2025-05-21 14:45 ` [PATCH v6.6 16/26] af_unix: Skip GC if no cycle exists Lee Jones
2025-05-21 14:45 ` [PATCH v6.6 17/26] af_unix: Avoid Tarjan's algorithm if unnecessary Lee Jones
2025-05-21 14:45 ` [PATCH v6.6 18/26] af_unix: Assign a unique index to SCC Lee Jones
2025-05-21 14:45 ` [PATCH v6.6 19/26] af_unix: Detect dead SCC Lee Jones
2025-05-21 14:45 ` [PATCH v6.6 20/26] af_unix: Replace garbage collection algorithm Lee Jones
2025-05-21 14:45 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2025-05-21 14:45 ` [PATCH v6.6 22/26] af_unix: Try not to hold unix_gc_lock during accept() Lee Jones
2025-05-21 14:45 ` [PATCH v6.6 23/26] af_unix: Don't access successor in unix_del_edges() during GC Lee Jones
2025-05-21 14:45 ` [PATCH v6.6 24/26] af_unix: Add dead flag to struct scm_fp_list Lee Jones
2025-05-21 14:45 ` [PATCH v6.6 25/26] af_unix: Fix garbage collection of embryos carrying OOB with SCM_RIGHTS Lee Jones
2025-05-21 14:45 ` [PATCH v6.6 26/26] af_unix: Fix uninit-value in __unix_walk_scc() Lee Jones
2025-05-29 12:26 ` [PATCH v6.6 00/26] af_unix: Align with upstream to avoid a potential UAF Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250521144803.2050504-22-lee@kernel.org \
--to=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=Rao.Shoaib@oracle.com \
--cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@amazon.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhal@rbox.co \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).