From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Shiming Cheng <shiming.cheng@mediatek.com>
Cc: willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, willemb@google.com,
edumazet@google.com, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, matthias.bgg@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
lena.wang@mediatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v5] net: fix udp gso skb_segment after pull from frag_list
Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 11:28:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250529102812.GL1484967@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250529015901.3814-1-shiming.cheng@mediatek.com>
On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 09:58:56AM +0800, Shiming Cheng wrote:
> Commit a1e40ac5b5e9 ("net: gso: fix udp gso fraglist segmentation after
> pull from frag_list") detected invalid geometry in frag_list skbs and
> redirects them from skb_segment_list to more robust skb_segment. But some
> packets with modified geometry can also hit bugs in that code. We don't
> know how many such cases exist. Addressing each one by one also requires
> touching the complex skb_segment code, which risks introducing bugs for
> other types of skbs. Instead, linearize all these packets that fail the
> basic invariants on gso fraglist skbs. That is more robust.
>
> If only part of the fraglist payload is pulled into head_skb, it will
> always cause exception when splitting skbs by skb_segment. For detailed
> call stack information, see below.
>
> Valid SKB_GSO_FRAGLIST skbs
> - consist of two or more segments
> - the head_skb holds the protocol headers plus first gso_size
> - one or more frag_list skbs hold exactly one segment
> - all but the last must be gso_size
>
> Optional datapath hooks such as NAT and BPF (bpf_skb_pull_data) can
> modify fraglist skbs, breaking these invariants.
>
> In extreme cases they pull one part of data into skb linear. For UDP,
> this causes three payloads with lengths of (11,11,10) bytes were
> pulled tail to become (12,10,10) bytes.
>
> The skbs no longer meets the above SKB_GSO_FRAGLIST conditions because
> payload was pulled into head_skb, it needs to be linearized before pass
> to regular skb_segment.
>
> skb_segment+0xcd0/0xd14
> __udp_gso_segment+0x334/0x5f4
> udp4_ufo_fragment+0x118/0x15c
> inet_gso_segment+0x164/0x338
> skb_mac_gso_segment+0xc4/0x13c
> __skb_gso_segment+0xc4/0x124
> validate_xmit_skb+0x9c/0x2c0
> validate_xmit_skb_list+0x4c/0x80
> sch_direct_xmit+0x70/0x404
> __dev_queue_xmit+0x64c/0xe5c
> neigh_resolve_output+0x178/0x1c4
> ip_finish_output2+0x37c/0x47c
> __ip_finish_output+0x194/0x240
> ip_finish_output+0x20/0xf4
> ip_output+0x100/0x1a0
> NF_HOOK+0xc4/0x16c
> ip_forward+0x314/0x32c
> ip_rcv+0x90/0x118
> __netif_receive_skb+0x74/0x124
> process_backlog+0xe8/0x1a4
> __napi_poll+0x5c/0x1f8
> net_rx_action+0x154/0x314
> handle_softirqs+0x154/0x4b8
>
> [118.376811] [C201134] rxq0_pus: [name:bug&]kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:4278!
> [118.376829] [C201134] rxq0_pus: [name:traps&]Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> [118.470774] [C201134] rxq0_pus: [name:mrdump&]Kernel Offset: 0x178cc00000 from 0xffffffc008000000
> [118.470810] [C201134] rxq0_pus: [name:mrdump&]PHYS_OFFSET: 0x40000000
> [118.470827] [C201134] rxq0_pus: [name:mrdump&]pstate: 60400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO)
> [118.470848] [C201134] rxq0_pus: [name:mrdump&]pc : [0xffffffd79598aefc] skb_segment+0xcd0/0xd14
> [118.470900] [C201134] rxq0_pus: [name:mrdump&]lr : [0xffffffd79598a5e8] skb_segment+0x3bc/0xd14
> [118.470928] [C201134] rxq0_pus: [name:mrdump&]sp : ffffffc008013770
>
> Fixes: a1e40ac5b5e9 ("net: gso: fix udp gso fraglist segmentation after pull from frag_list")
nit: This may not be important, but I believe that "net :" doesn't appear
in the subject of the cited patch in git history.
That is, I think this should be:
Fixes: a1e40ac5b5e9 ("gso: fix udp gso fraglist segmentation after pull from frag_list")
> Signed-off-by: Shiming Cheng <shiming.cheng@mediatek.com>
...
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-29 10:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-29 1:58 [PATCH net v5] net: fix udp gso skb_segment after pull from frag_list Shiming Cheng
2025-05-29 2:18 ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-05-29 10:28 ` Simon Horman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250529102812.GL1484967@horms.kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=lena.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=shiming.cheng@mediatek.com \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).